Anonymous wrote:For crying out loud -- does any ADULT really think that they will fail an entire chemistry class over behavior issues? OP is being as hysterical as an eighth grader. Stop whipping up your child into a frenzy.
The rookie mistake was by the unqualified dean who made a threat he can't deliver on -- I hope he becomes yet one more in a string of supposed male role models who aren't the right fit for this school.
Wow that is a bit harsh and very quick to judge. I have had interactions with the Dean and was quite impressed. Even if he misspoke or was out of line, I really do not think it is fair to call for his dismissal over something like this that is alleged to have occurred at all. I do not know anyone who has not had any hiccups on the road in any new job at all including myself. Geesh![]()
As for your previous comment about the "rare" student populace, consider this: unlike some of the other BASIS locations, DC also has a very unusually skewed populace at both ends - while we have 40%, predominantly low SES who drop out, at the other end, given Washington DC's unique position and role where it comes to national and international policy, it's filled with think tanks, research organizations, et cetera and has a disproportionately high number of A-type, and PhD type families (one of the highest concentrations of PhDs in the nation) who've come to DC from all over the nation, and all over the world - that are highly motivated and driven and who are perfectly fine with the acceleration, expectations and workload that BASIS puts on kids - it's not such a "rare" thing here, and certainly a very different demographic, culture and mindset from the southwest, where I also lived for a while.
Anonymous wrote:There are 25 kids in a class-one they should not result in everyone getting punished. And 8th graders are emotional, irrational and dramatic, so of course they are freaking out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, I am not a teacher at Basis but I do teach middle school science and I am cracking up at this thread. This teacher made such a rookie mistake-- I learned long ago that if you are going to use food in a lab, you better make sure it's uncooked beans or something similar, because if you use candy it's not coming back. LOL. Once one of my colleagues had raw potato slices in salt water to show hyper-, hypo-, and isotonic solutions, and a kid actually ate a raw potato slice! Kids that age are nuts, man. (Excuse the pun.) I'm not saying it's okay, and obviously if a kid stole something he or she should be disciplined, but I can believe a kid taking some candy has blown up into some kind of federal case. Goodness.
Yes and no.
I can TOTALLY agree with you where it comes to Elementary School, 5th graders, et cetera. Yeah, kids are nuts, they don't know better, they make lots of mistakes, they don't listen, and you should EXPECT it. Yeah, I can TOTALLY see handing out candy for a class experiment saying "This candy is for an experiment, and before you even touch it, we're going to count/measure..." but before you've barely even uttered two syllables, little Johnny Turbogullet has already in nanoseconds gorfed his down in one swell foop without even chewing and has shot his hand up, saying, "Umm, Ms. Crabapple, I already accidentally ate mine..." And yeah, that's cute/funny/and totally to be expected.
But this is different. That's not what happened here. These are teenagers, 8th graders, who at that age should be well into knowing better. It's a kid who stealthily and deliberately took something that they knew wasn't theirs. It's a kid who selfishly decided, "rather than the class sharing in a tasty treat, screw them all, I'm taking it all for myself," it's a kid who basically said "F-U classmates, F-U teacher, F-U class experiment." It's behavior that I would never tolerate from my own kid at that age, and I am not at all alone in that regard. If, by the time kids have gotten to be teenagers, are still engaging in that kind of selfish behavior, and at that point still don't have any regard or respect for others or the property of others, then the grownups have failed them and have likely set them up for a ton of future failure, and that's serious and sad business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OK glad you don't fall for the marketing, but do you agree that BASIS markets itself as a school for all who are willing to work hard? You are right it is a niche school but the charter model needs bodies in the seats for funding.
I also support charter choice and oppose monolithic unified districts - one size does not fit all.
And I am sure there are many stellar students in DC from across the socio-economic spectrum who will end up at BASIS and excel academically. I still think for them that BASIS's standardized test-centric approach will short change them but whatever, they will do fine. But these sorts of kids will only be some percentage of the student body at BASIS DC or any other campus, and I would expect well less than 50%. For their parents, if that is what they want then that is fine. But I am concerned about out those that leave and those that struggle but remain. Freedom of choice does not alleviate my concern for those that get pushed out for no other reason than "they couldn't hack it". Nor of course does it address the problem of those who remain but are totally overwhelmed. I see this not as a student issue but as a real and systemic problem in BASIS model but they don't see it that way and, because it is a model imposed from the top down and they have their #1 ranking, they are not inclined to change. So I don't teach there any more and I speak out against them from time to time. Truth to power, etc.![]()
I've been lurking here for days, PP, and your well-reasoned posts are refreshing.
However, your perspective as a teacher and my perspective as a parent are quite different. Your teaching career affords you the luxury of moving from school to school over many years in search of a learning environment you consider to be ideal. I must enroll my kids in school now and must select from among those that are available to me today. Having put a lot of thought into this decision, I concluded that BASIS DC was the best choice. Deal MS would probably have been my second choice, but we can't get in. Latin PCS would have been my third choice, but we would probably not have gotten in any way. After that, we probably would have moved to MD or VA.
You argue that the BASIS model is flawed because a large percentage of the kids who attend don't or cannot thrive there. I, on the other hand, would argue that the struggling students at BASIS point to a failure on the part of local public schools. If every middle schooler in had access to a functioning neighborhood MS and HS, those unhappy struggling kids at BASIS would return to their local schools. They wouldn't remain at BASIS simply due to a lack of a reasonable alternative.
I agree with you insofar as BASIS may, due to lack of alternatives, be the best option. HAving a great student body (generally motivated, grounded) and good teachers sad to say can be a rare thing in public schools. And yes this is due in large part to the abject failure of the public school system. But that doesn't alter the fact that the BASIS curriculum is seriously inappropriate for a substantial percentage of its student body but it keeps pushing enrollment because it needs to fill seats to keep lights on (for this reason, too, they insist that class size does not matter which I know to be flat wrong in an accelerated curriculum I don't care how many studies you wave in front of my face!). . Fact of the matter is that only a small subset of the student population is going to be able to handle accelerated math/science curriculum and this is regardless of what other options are out there.
My hippocratic oath for teaching says I cant teach at a place where many students are being hurt or not served by the system. And yes, i had the fortune to be able to move on. If I were a parent and my kid were able to thrive in that model I suppose that problem for others would not be my concern. But frequently parents of kids that are hurting do not realize how common and maybe unavoidable their experience is, so they and the student flail for years to keep the kid above water.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ha ha don't get me started about the ATF (aka parents paying teachers so BASIS can free up working capital to expand the bureaucracy or open new campuses). At least when I was there we had a fixed contract at the beginning of the year. The ATF was not a bonus and if you look at the thin information about it they never claim it is a bonus. I presume it was just used to pay the contractual salary (which did have lots of bonuses built in for things like attendance, student performance on APs, etc.).
Anonymous wrote:I was being imprecise - yes I agree BASIS clearly represents itself as a school pushing intensive college prep and AP coursework with a heavy STEM focus. But my point is that it also clearly represents itself as a school that, by virtue of its world-renown program and infrastructure, can enable most if not all students to succeed in this endeavor i.e., no selective admissions, no tuition, etc. I have in mind this article http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2014/04/23/basis-and-university-high-are-top-us-high-schools-which-means
and this response by Tucson HOS http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2014/05/06/the-head-of-basis-tucson-north-responds
in which she said, in no uncertain terms, "the mission of BASIS is to provide a world-class education to all children" and "make this challenging curriculum accessible to all students".
The economic reality is that BASIS charter school cannot afford to have a student body limited to those who can really handle the academic curriculum (about 50% in my experience), let alone excel (5-15% in my experience).
Anonymous wrote:ha ha don't get me started about the ATF (aka parents paying teachers so BASIS can free up working capital to expand the bureaucracy or open new campuses). At least when I was there we had a fixed contract at the beginning of the year. The ATF was not a bonus and if you look at the thin information about it they never claim it is a bonus. I presume it was just used to pay the contractual salary (which did have lots of bonuses built in for things like attendance, student performance on APs, etc.).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OK glad you don't fall for the marketing, but do you agree that BASIS markets itself as a school for all who are willing to work hard? You are right it is a niche school but the charter model needs bodies in the seats for funding.
I also support charter choice and oppose monolithic unified districts - one size does not fit all.
And I am sure there are many stellar students in DC from across the socio-economic spectrum who will end up at BASIS and excel academically. I still think for them that BASIS's standardized test-centric approach will short change them but whatever, they will do fine. But these sorts of kids will only be some percentage of the student body at BASIS DC or any other campus, and I would expect well less than 50%. For their parents, if that is what they want then that is fine. But I am concerned about out those that leave and those that struggle but remain. Freedom of choice does not alleviate my concern for those that get pushed out for no other reason than "they couldn't hack it". Nor of course does it address the problem of those who remain but are totally overwhelmed. I see this not as a student issue but as a real and systemic problem in BASIS model but they don't see it that way and, because it is a model imposed from the top down and they have their #1 ranking, they are not inclined to change. So I don't teach there any more and I speak out against them from time to time. Truth to power, etc.![]()
I've been lurking here for days, PP, and your well-reasoned posts are refreshing.
However, your perspective as a teacher and my perspective as a parent are quite different. Your teaching career affords you the luxury of moving from school to school over many years in search of a learning environment you consider to be ideal. I must enroll my kids in school now and must select from among those that are available to me today. Having put a lot of thought into this decision, I concluded that BASIS DC was the best choice. Deal MS would probably have been my second choice, but we can't get in. Latin PCS would have been my third choice, but we would probably not have gotten in any way. After that, we probably would have moved to MD or VA.
You argue that the BASIS model is flawed because a large percentage of the kids who attend don't or cannot thrive there. I, on the other hand, would argue that the struggling students at BASIS point to a failure on the part of local public schools. If every middle schooler in had access to a functioning neighborhood MS and HS, those unhappy struggling kids at BASIS would return to their local schools. They wouldn't remain at BASIS simply due to a lack of a reasonable alternative.
Anonymous wrote:
OK glad you don't fall for the marketing, but do you agree that BASIS markets itself as a school for all who are willing to work hard? You are right it is a niche school but the charter model needs bodies in the seats for funding.
I also support charter choice and oppose monolithic unified districts - one size does not fit all.
And I am sure there are many stellar students in DC from across the socio-economic spectrum who will end up at BASIS and excel academically. I still think for them that BASIS's standardized test-centric approach will short change them but whatever, they will do fine. But these sorts of kids will only be some percentage of the student body at BASIS DC or any other campus, and I would expect well less than 50%. For their parents, if that is what they want then that is fine. But I am concerned about out those that leave and those that struggle but remain. Freedom of choice does not alleviate my concern for those that get pushed out for no other reason than "they couldn't hack it". Nor of course does it address the problem of those who remain but are totally overwhelmed. I see this not as a student issue but as a real and systemic problem in BASIS model but they don't see it that way and, because it is a model imposed from the top down and they have their #1 ranking, they are not inclined to change. So I don't teach there any more and I speak out against them from time to time. Truth to power, etc.![]()