Anonymous wrote:There's another soccer team with a similar profile and the school is not a large one. To say having this many redshirted children doesn't affect the rest of the class especially in FCPS where there's a lot of tracking within the same grade level is being obtuse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Why not just admit the redshirting?
Because people are sanctimonious jerks about redshirting. Read any thread about redshirting on this board for an example.
Reading DCUM has made me actively support redshirting.
Me too. I used to be anti-redshirting, until I read the posts from the anti-redshirters on DCUM.
It's becoming sort of a DCUM sport: watching the "on time" mommies work themselves into a lather over the "6 yr old K" kids. Funny stuff.
I think that a good percentage of the anti-redshirt people on this board are probably really, really sheltered and have encountered few real problems in life. I don't know how else to explain the lather and hysteria.
Anonymous wrote:There are 6 out of 12 boys from the same school on my child's soccer team who are redshirted. HALF! I get it that it's not a widespread problem. It's difficult to discuss because it's a very localized problem. Most schools have parents that can't afford this option, but at our school everyone can.
Anonymous wrote:There's another soccer team with a similar profile and the school is not a large one. To say having this many redshirted children doesn't affect the rest of the class especially in FCPS where there's a lot of tracking within the same grade level is being obtuse.
Anonymous wrote:There are 6 out of 12 boys from the same school on my child's soccer team who are redshirted. HALF! I get it that it's not a widespread problem. It's difficult to discuss because it's a very localized problem. Most schools have parents that can't afford this option, but at our school everyone can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Why not just admit the redshirting?
Because people are sanctimonious jerks about redshirting. Read any thread about redshirting on this board for an example.
Reading DCUM has made me actively support redshirting.
Um, no, the reshirters are the sanctimonious jerks. They have to be, to support their gaming of the system.
It amuses me to no end that other people spend so much more emotional energy worrying over my decision to redshirt my child than I ever did. Believe me, I spend none on wondering why you chose to send your child when you did.
No kidding. We thought an extra year of a play-based JrK would be better for our summer DS. So that's what we did. The entire consideration took about 3 minutes. No regrets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Why not just admit the redshirting?
Because people are sanctimonious jerks about redshirting. Read any thread about redshirting on this board for an example.
Reading DCUM has made me actively support redshirting.
Um, no, the reshirters are the sanctimonious jerks. They have to be, to support their gaming of the system.
It amuses me to no end that other people spend so much more emotional energy worrying over my decision to redshirt my child than I ever did. Believe me, I spend none on wondering why you chose to send your child when you did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How far back to people usually redshirt? My son was born April 5, and I don't want him to be the youngest in the class. Are most April boys held back?
June through September are the usual ages for waiting an extra year.
Do most kids with these bdays get redshirted? If so, why don't the school districts just change the cut off to May 31?
FWIW - my summer born DCs were not held back and are doing very well academically, with the older in HGC.
No "most" kids do not get redshirted. One poster seems to think there are massive numbers of kids being held back - but no one has concrete information. I do not think that many are held back each year. honestly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Why not just admit the redshirting?
Because people are sanctimonious jerks about redshirting. Read any thread about redshirting on this board for an example.
Reading DCUM has made me actively support redshirting.
Um, no, the reshirters are the sanctimonious jerks. They have to be, to support their gaming of the system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Why not just admit the redshirting?
Because people are sanctimonious jerks about redshirting. Read any thread about redshirting on this board for an example.
Reading DCUM has made me actively support redshirting.
Um, no, the reshirters are the sanctimonious jerks. They have to be, to support their gaming of the system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How far back to people usually redshirt? My son was born April 5, and I don't want him to be the youngest in the class. Are most April boys held back?
June through September are the usual ages for waiting an extra year.
Do most kids with these bdays get redshirted? If so, why don't the school districts just change the cut off to May 31?
FWIW - my summer born DCs were not held back and are doing very well academically, with the older in HGC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How far back to people usually redshirt? My son was born April 5, and I don't want him to be the youngest in the class. Are most April boys held back?
June through September are the usual ages for waiting an extra year.