Anonymous wrote:Exactly! I don’t have a personal ax to grind with any particular charters. I'm just wondering aloud why the charters listed above are so popular on these boards, yet their scores don’t seem to have earned them that love. Why don’t I hear more about KIPP, TM and the others on DCUM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you wait to see the actual data from the schools before getting all bent out of shape? Also, consider that LAMB and Stokes are also teaching their children in other languages, which might impact the time spent on English and math.
That's a poor excuse. What college is going to care that you are bilingual but functionally illiterate and innumerate?
+1 that excuse is unacceptable
What do you want? Even BASIS has a math proficiency of 81% and reading of 84%, and that's among the highest scoring schools in the city. Yes, we should be pushing for all DC students, whether DCPS or DCPCS, to be proficient. The DC CAS is not a difficult test. But why are you pulling out certain charters, particularly those that are also teaching another language, for an extra heaping of scorn?
Exactly! I don’t have a personal ax to grind with any particular charters. I'm just wondering aloud why the charters listed above are so popular on these boards, yet their scores don’t seem to have earned them that love. Why don’t I hear more about KIPP, TM and the others on DCUM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can we discuss the HUGE decline in Composition scores at Stokes (went down by 40 points!) and Washington Latin (went down by 42.7 points)? Cray.
Yes, I noticed that too. How is that much of a decline possible in a year? Did they change that part of the test?
Anonymous wrote:Can we discuss the HUGE decline in Composition scores at Stokes (went down by 40 points!) and Washington Latin (went down by 42.7 points)? Cray.
Anonymous wrote:advanced is usually around 80% and proficient 65%... Standards are not very high.
Anonymous wrote:advanced is usually around 80% and proficient 65%... Standards are not very high.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you wait to see the actual data from the schools before getting all bent out of shape? Also, consider that LAMB and Stokes are also teaching their children in other languages, which might impact the time spent on English and math.
That's a poor excuse. What college is going to care that you are bilingual but functionally illiterate and innumerate?
+1 that excuse is unacceptable
What do you want? Even BASIS has a math proficiency of 81% and reading of 84%, and that's among the highest scoring schools in the city. Yes, we should be pushing for all DC students, whether DCPS or DCPCS, to be proficient. The DC CAS is not a difficult test. But why are you pulling out certain charters, particularly those that are also teaching another language, for an extra heaping of scorn?
Not PP, but I don't think the scorn is directed at the charters so much as their fans on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you wait to see the actual data from the schools before getting all bent out of shape? Also, consider that LAMB and Stokes are also teaching their children in other languages, which might impact the time spent on English and math.
That's a poor excuse. What college is going to care that you are bilingual but functionally illiterate and innumerate?
+1 that excuse is unacceptable
What do you want? Even BASIS has a math proficiency of 81% and reading of 84%, and that's among the highest scoring schools in the city. Yes, we should be pushing for all DC students, whether DCPS or DCPCS, to be proficient. The DC CAS is not a difficult test. But why are you pulling out certain charters, particularly those that are also teaching another language, for an extra heaping of scorn?