I know multiple families dealing with disability/death and life insurance may float you for a few years, which is it's purpose. It will not care for you for the rest of your life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Guess your family wasn't familiar with the concept of life insurance? Your mom probably just wanted to return to work.
And glad I'm not your wife if you always think your way is the right way.
I know multiple families dealing with disability/death and life insurance may float you for a few years, which is it's purpose. It will not care for you for the rest of your life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Thank you for mansplaining!
How about "both parents still want a parent at home after school" as a reason for someone to still stay home? It amazes me that people are so wed to a paycheck that they think everyone should work even when they don't have to.
So. Does your husband only work the exact hours he needs to survive... or is he so wedded to a paycheck that he works more hours, away from his children, raised by a single mom.
I think you are totally missing the point. In this case, one parent doesn't WANT to work. And the other one is okay with that. This isn't a value judgment against those who work.
The mansplainer... said it makes sense for the SAHP to go back to work once the children are in school.
The defensive SAHP said that this means this couple is wedded to a paycheck. There is a reason if you want to mitigate risk for a SAHP to at least go back part time in the off chance there is an injury, illness, death or divorce. This is not really about WANTING to work or NOT WANTING to work. My teenager... does not want to work, but he is working. You can't just live off the dole. More than likely if there is an injury/illness, the family with 1 working parent will live off the dole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Guess your family wasn't familiar with the concept of life insurance? Your mom probably just wanted to return to work.
And glad I'm not your wife if you always think your way is the right way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Thank you for mansplaining!
How about "both parents still want a parent at home after school" as a reason for someone to still stay home? It amazes me that people are so wed to a paycheck that they think everyone should work even when they don't have to.
I know right? Why should I work if I don't have to? I mean, the government will provide for my housing and food and healthcare if I quit my job, and then I could stay home with my precious snowflakes. Working is for suckers!
Are you really comparing a SAHM to being on welfare? Some of you really are crazy.
Absolutely. A sahm saying she doesn't work because she doesn't want to and doesn't have to is the exact same mentality as someone on welfare. Just because her free money comes from her husband doesn't mean she is any less lazy and entitled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Thank you for mansplaining!
How about "both parents still want a parent at home after school" as a reason for someone to still stay home? It amazes me that people are so wed to a paycheck that they think everyone should work even when they don't have to.
So. Does your husband only work the exact hours he needs to survive... or is he so wedded to a paycheck that he works more hours, away from his children, raised by a single mom.
I think you are totally missing the point. In this case, one parent doesn't WANT to work. And the other one is okay with that. This isn't a value judgment against those who work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Thank you for mansplaining!
How about "both parents still want a parent at home after school" as a reason for someone to still stay home? It amazes me that people are so wed to a paycheck that they think everyone should work even when they don't have to.
I know right? Why should I work if I don't have to? I mean, the government will provide for my housing and food and healthcare if I quit my job, and then I could stay home with my precious snowflakes. Working is for suckers!
Are you really comparing a SAHM to being on welfare? Some of you really are crazy.
Absolutely. A sahm saying she doesn't work because she doesn't want to and doesn't have to is the exact same mentality as someone on welfare. Just because her free money comes from her husband doesn't mean she is any less lazy and entitled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Thank you for mansplaining!
How about "both parents still want a parent at home after school" as a reason for someone to still stay home? It amazes me that people are so wed to a paycheck that they think everyone should work even when they don't have to.
I know right? Why should I work if I don't have to? I mean, the government will provide for my housing and food and healthcare if I quit my job, and then I could stay home with my precious snowflakes. Working is for suckers!
Are you really comparing a SAHM to being on welfare? Some of you really are crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Guess your family wasn't familiar with the concept of life insurance? Your mom probably just wanted to return to work.
And glad I'm not your wife if you always think your way is the right way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Thank you for mansplaining!
How about "both parents still want a parent at home after school" as a reason for someone to still stay home? It amazes me that people are so wed to a paycheck that they think everyone should work even when they don't have to.
So. Does your husband only work the exact hours he needs to survive... or is he so wedded to a paycheck that he works more hours, away from his children, raised by a single mom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I worry every day and night. Is that what you want to hear, OP? That I quit my job willy-nilly and never once thought about the consequences.
OP here. I'm not sure whether you are being ironic here. No, that's not what I mean. Women make choices that benefit their family but damage their earning potential and I am not sure how much do they factor in the possibility of divorce.
My solution would be a prenup or postnuptial agreement that in case I made such a decision (possibly at his request), he would make up for any shortfall in earnings come divorce.
How about making choices that benefit the foundational years of your child's early development? Your earning potential will never fix a neglected baby or toddler who wasn't loved all day, every day. Btw, I'm not talking about the long-distance love you have from far away in your downtown office.
As an adoptive parent this really hurts to read. Because my child wasn't loved all day, every day you think her development is screwed? We both know that is not necessarily the case, just like there is no guarantee that your children, God forbid, won't end up screwed up anyway.
PP, I'm an adoptive parent too, and we did not get our dd until she was 3 years old. I know these comments can hurt also. But you and I both know that our children are thriving, and it's really amazing how well children can do in lots of different environments, isn't it? Just learn to let comments like these roll off your shoulder and just keep on, keepin' on doing what's best for your child. Signed, adoptive mom of one kid who's doing great! And she even went to daycare after we got her - gasp!![]()
Anonymous wrote:your own ambivalence about your decisions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I worry every day and night. Is that what you want to hear, OP? That I quit my job willy-nilly and never once thought about the consequences.
OP here. I'm not sure whether you are being ironic here. No, that's not what I mean. Women make choices that benefit their family but damage their earning potential and I am not sure how much do they factor in the possibility of divorce.
My solution would be a prenup or postnuptial agreement that in case I made such a decision (possibly at his request), he would make up for any shortfall in earnings come divorce.
How about making choices that benefit the foundational years of your child's early development? Your earning potential will never fix a neglected baby or toddler who wasn't loved all day, every day. Btw, I'm not talking about the long-distance love you have from far away in your downtown office.
As an adoptive parent this really hurts to read. Because my child wasn't loved all day, every day you think her development is screwed? We both know that is not necessarily the case, just like there is no guarantee that your children, God forbid, won't end up screwed up anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a man and cannot speak for any women on this forum and their experience, but I can relate my mother's experience.
I recently asked her how old my brother was - he was the youngest of us - was when she went back to work. My mother was an RN and she worked at least part-time until my brother was born. My father was military and later a civilian lawyer.
She said she went back to work full-time when my brother was about 10 and the motivating factor was that a neighbor two doors down was widowed and left with virtually nothing and had to start at the bottom in terms of building up experience and a career.
So, she decided to go back to work full-time to be in the workforce and to be able to provide for herself independent of my father.
My parents were married for 45 years until my father's death, but my mother never ever regretted going back to work.
There is really no reason, especially after the kids reach full-time school age, for SAHM's to stay home, especially if they are educated and can work. Of course, this does not account for parents dealing with SNs or otherwise handicapped children.
Thank you for mansplaining!
How about "both parents still want a parent at home after school" as a reason for someone to still stay home? It amazes me that people are so wed to a paycheck that they think everyone should work even when they don't have to.
So. Does your husband only work the exact hours he needs to survive... or is he so wedded to a paycheck that he works more hours, away from his children, raised by a single mom.