Anonymous wrote:My fiance just bought a condo in DC (20016) after saving for a year. We have 2 children and fit fine in 888 sq feet condo.
We are hoping to buy a bigger place in 6-10 years.
Why not buy smaller pace? Put down 5% at least. FHA is a rip-off.
Anonymous wrote:OP here....this made me feel as hopeless as I thought I should be feeling. Great.
Anonymous wrote:OP here....this made me feel as hopeless as I thought I should be feeling. Great.
Anonymous wrote:We put 5% down, not $60k-$80k. And we took a TSP loan and a Roth IRA withdrawal to pay the down payment, fees, closing costs, etc.
No family help. Lots of student loans (two lawyers). Our PITI payment is the same as what we were paying to rent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, it's hard. We saved significantly before we had kids and we bought the house that we wanted to raise kids in. It would have been much harder to save enough after kids. But this is part of why we didn't have kids until 9 years after we got married.
But some good ideas. I work a full-time job, but I have a second job that I work weekly that gives me about $3000 per year. Before kids, that money went to the house fund. Now, after kids, some of that money goes to a splurge of a monthly housecleaning service that helps keep us from being completely exhausted and the rest goes into a fund for when our 9 year old car dies (I'm hoping it will make it to 15 years, and it seems to be in great shape now, so possible). Picking up a part-time job, even if only seasonal is a good idea to help create a house fund.
That's great, but that's 9 years you lose with your kids. 9 years you lose with your future grandchildren. Waiting to have kids is a pretty big sacrifice for a material object. I personally don't think it's worth it.
Well, enjoy living with your kids in an apartment, then.
You can't have your cake and eat it, too, honey.
We had a house before we had kids, but whatever. I'm just saying I wouldn't wait 9 years just to be able to have a house I own (you can rent houses, too). I'd rather have 9 years with my kids than a mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:For us: bought in 2006 with very little down when they were still letting you take out a HELOC as a second loan without imposing PMI. We bought near the top of the market, the house was kind of a dump and cost less than $500k, and the Zillow value of the property pretty much tanked within a year of buying. When the market crashed, we were kind of stuck but also not in a hurry to get out because we had to live somewhere, right? And the kids were so young school didn't matter yet. We were paranoid about the outstanding balance of the HELOC putting us underwater, so we applied every cent of our would-be savings to paying it down. I wouldn't say we made lots of sacrifices to make it happen, but we also weren't out buying any big ticket items - like I said, we were kind of freaked out by having this huge HELOC and no equity. We made smart upgrades over time and when we finally sold in 2014, we had been paying down the HELOC, the house looked great and at closing we got a big enough check to support a 20% down payment on a decent house in an excellent school district. I place very little importance on how nice a house is if it's at least livable and safe, but owning a property in a stable and well-regarded school district where we can now hunker down for the next decade or two feels good. When the kids turn 5, that can really change the way you view what you do and do not have in a house. Just buying to buy was the mistake we made. We didn't actually need a house when we bought in 2006, and if we could have seen the direction things were going, we could easily have done better just renting. That said, it left a very big impression on us being stuck with more debt than we were comfortable with. I'm not sure we would have saved as much if we had not been stricken with horror that we had bought with almost zero down and the implications it had in a down market.