Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Future Janney parent here. We've been warned by two separate families that the "donation" is no-joke pressure tactics, and that your kids access to stuff is definitely tied to whether you donated or not. One parent told me another parent (soliciting their donation) called the switchboard at his office - not knowing the parents direct line - and got patched through.
I like where we live, but if these stories are true, I'm not looking forward to this...
Good Lord. This is my eighth year at Janney and I have simply NO IDEA how much any family donates. I have never been asked to donate and no one has ever mentioned to me that they've been on the receiving end of PTA pressure tactics. There have been years that haven't given a dime until later in the school year and I've never heard a peep from anyone. At every turn, the PTA goes to great length to mention that they value participation rather than a set dollar value. Everyone needs to just get a grip.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my title I, 99% FARMs school at full capacity, we receive $318,884 in title I funds, in a school that is community eligible for title I in which almost all the students are poor. That's significantly less money than Janney beings in for fundraising through the PTA, and my school has a population that has much greater academic and non-academic needs than at Janney. Don't bullshit us and say that JKLM schools bring in less than title 1; it simply is not true.
can you identify the school? how many kids are there? how much the school brings in per pupil?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know where people say Payne gets millions in title 1 funds--its budget shows around $211k: http://dcps.dc.gov/DCPS/Files/downloads/ABOUT%20DCPS/Budget%20-%20Finance/FY14%20documents/Updated%20School%20Allocations-FY14/DCPS-PAYNE-Allocation-FY14.pdf
Also, it has a large homeless population, so the challenges its students face are vastly more complicated than those of Janney's population.
I am the poster who did the Murch/Payne comparison. I never said that Payne gets millions in title 1 funds. I simply took the total budget of the schools for 2015 and divided by the projected number of students (one poster posted the link to the DCPS 2015 budgets for all schools). it comes out that Murch gets about $9,000 per student while Payne gets $14,000 per student. $5000 more per student is not really negligible, way more any PTA could raise. if the schools had the same number of students, Payne would get overn $3Million more than Murch. these are the numbers given by DCPS (clearly Payne gets more money for other sources in addition to title 1). again, this is not to say that Murch should get more, it is simply in response to posters saying that JKLM schools have more money than schools in poor areas because the parents raise funds. it appears instead that poor schools gets more money (at least Payne gets more than Murch) clearly the money raised by the Murch PTA is only a fraction of the difference in funding with Payne. nothing wrong with Payne getting more money per pupil since its student population needs specific support, but let's say that it does get more money and not less
Where is your source? Please include links and as much detail as possible.
Anonymous wrote:Why do you doubt it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know where people say Payne gets millions in title 1 funds--its budget shows around $211k: http://dcps.dc.gov/DCPS/Files/downloads/ABOUT%20DCPS/Budget%20-%20Finance/FY14%20documents/Updated%20School%20Allocations-FY14/DCPS-PAYNE-Allocation-FY14.pdf
Also, it has a large homeless population, so the challenges its students face are vastly more complicated than those of Janney's population.
I am the poster who did the Murch/Payne comparison. I never said that Payne gets millions in title 1 funds. I simply took the total budget of the schools for 2015 and divided by the projected number of students (one poster posted the link to the DCPS 2015 budgets for all schools). it comes out that Murch gets about $9,000 per student while Payne gets $14,000 per student. $5000 more per student is not really negligible, way more any PTA could raise. if the schools had the same number of students, Payne would get overn $3Million more than Murch. these are the numbers given by DCPS (clearly Payne gets more money for other sources in addition to title 1). again, this is not to say that Murch should get more, it is simply in response to posters saying that JKLM schools have more money than schools in poor areas because the parents raise funds. it appears instead that poor schools gets more money (at least Payne gets more than Murch) clearly the money raised by the Murch PTA is only a fraction of the difference in funding with Payne. nothing wrong with Payne getting more money per pupil since its student population needs specific support, but let's say that it does get more money and not less
Anonymous wrote:I don't know where people say Payne gets millions in title 1 funds--its budget shows around $211k: http://dcps.dc.gov/DCPS/Files/downloads/ABOUT%20DCPS/Budget%20-%20Finance/FY14%20documents/Updated%20School%20Allocations-FY14/DCPS-PAYNE-Allocation-FY14.pdf
Also, it has a large homeless population, so the challenges its students face are vastly more complicated than those of Janney's population.
Anonymous wrote:Of course JKLM families have no idea what a 99% FARMs number means in terms of the community eligibility option. You would run away from a school that was title 1, let alone high poverty. Actually, you probably think that the 40% threshold for title 1 is high poverty.
Anonymous wrote:Future Janney parent here. We've been warned by two separate families that the "donation" is no-joke pressure tactics, and that your kids access to stuff is definitely tied to whether you donated or not. One parent told me another parent (soliciting their donation) called the switchboard at his office - not knowing the parents direct line - and got patched through.
I like where we live, but if these stories are true, I'm not looking forward to this...
Anonymous wrote:Future Janney parent here. We've been warned by two separate families that the "donation" is no-joke pressure tactics, and that your kids access to stuff is definitely tied to whether you donated or not. One parent told me another parent (soliciting their donation) called the switchboard at his office - not knowing the parents direct line - and got patched through.
I like where we live, but if these stories are true, I'm not looking forward to this...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my title I, 99% FARMs school at full capacity, we receive $318,884 in title I funds, in a school that is community eligible for title I in which almost all the students are poor. That's significantly less money than Janney beings in for fundraising through the PTA, and my school has a population that has much greater academic and non-academic needs than at Janney. Don't bullshit us and say that JKLM schools bring in less than title 1; it simply is not true.
Is that school as big as Janney?
No, but it still comes out to a lot less than the $1000 Janney's PTA spends per child, according to an earlier post, and my school has a much more vulnerable population.