Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm wondering why, in the high HHI scenarios being spoken of here, this is an either/or -- either the meals are cooked, house is clean, kids are cared for, clothes are washed/dry-cleaned, stress is low, and wife stays home, OR meals are takeout, house is messy, kids are on their own, stress is high, and wife works.
If you make a lot of money (let's say, top 1% in DC area) and wife's income would be "fraction" of yours, wouldn't you be able to outsource everything (nanny, cooking, housekeeping, laundry, errands, etc.) so that both of you work outside of the home but don't have to to the grunt work at home? Seems like this would actually be the ideal scenario. Two working parents in a high-income household minus the stress of cooking/cleaning/laundry/errands, with the added security of a second income for the "just in case" scenarios?
We tried outsourcing a lot so that we could maintain 2 busy professional careers. It is hard to outsource everything. And at some point, our children wanted us, not a hired third party. Of course it is easy to outsource the laundry. It is much harder to outsource the childcare when you have a sick child who wants you or you find out the night before that your child has a school performance the next day. For us, it came down to either getting 2 nannies or one of is cutting back/quitting. And I fully understand that is not a choice many would make or can make. But it works for us.
Why would you only find out the night before about a school performance? I work full time and yet receive the same emails the SAHMs do about school events. Sounds like you and your spouse were not very connected to the school community while WOH.
I am just using this as an example. There are lots of things that cannot be effectively outsourced. And, I guess I like doing some of that stuff. I don't want to outsource the cooking. I want to be the one to pick my kids up from school. I want to be able to see most of their school performances. I was unable to do these things when I worked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I like coming home to a clean house, a happy wife and a hot meal. I make enough so money is not an issue.
+1. I love my job and don't like raising kids/household chores. I like spending time with my kids doing fun activities, but leave the rest to my wife. Having a wife at home means I can go on work trips, take clients out to dinner, work late at the office, and spend weekends golfing or hiking with my friends if I want -- and know when I do get home, there will be a hot meal waiting for me.
You don't like raising kids? Why the fuck did you have them, then? And what with all of the work trips/dinners, working late, golf and friend time, I'm amazed you got married either, since you clearly have time for your wife and those "fun activities" with your kids. Don't kid yourself, I bet your wife is cheating on you and secretly hates your guts.
I like having kids. I just don't like taking them to the doctor's office when they're sick and waiting hours to be seen, having to juggle my schedule on a snow day, etc. The same stuff you hate, except that you have to do because you don't have a wife to do it for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I bet the answer would depend on how old the kids are. I assume there are probably lots of men who might wonder what their wives do all day, once the kids are in school full-time. I know my guy friends have wondered this aloud to me. But when the kids are really young, it's cool for the wives to be home with them.
it would probably also depend on the salary that's not being earned. a $30K earner isn't going to have much impact on the family if the husband makes a lot, but a $100K salary could make a big difference.
Nope. Not in this house. I didn't stay at home until the older kids went to school. One of my school-aged sons threw up this morning. You can bet that my husband, away on business, doesn't want to deal with that. It seems like there is always a snow day/ doctor's appt/ after school sports/illness, especially when you have three kids.
Agree. I am a SAHM of 4 school age kids. While I am sure my husband would love the extra income, he literally wouldn't know how to handle things like snow days, needing to pick up the kids early if they got sick, etc. He has always had me around to take care of that.
I find that sad. Do you not?
What would he do, if god forbid, you died?
Quickly remarry, and hope that step-mom will do it all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I bet the answer would depend on how old the kids are. I assume there are probably lots of men who might wonder what their wives do all day, once the kids are in school full-time. I know my guy friends have wondered this aloud to me. But when the kids are really young, it's cool for the wives to be home with them.
it would probably also depend on the salary that's not being earned. a $30K earner isn't going to have much impact on the family if the husband makes a lot, but a $100K salary could make a big difference.
Nope. Not in this house. I didn't stay at home until the older kids went to school. One of my school-aged sons threw up this morning. You can bet that my husband, away on business, doesn't want to deal with that. It seems like there is always a snow day/ doctor's appt/ after school sports/illness, especially when you have three kids.
Agree. I am a SAHM of 4 school age kids. While I am sure my husband would love the extra income, he literally wouldn't know how to handle things like snow days, needing to pick up the kids early if they got sick, etc. He has always had me around to take care of that.
I find that sad. Do you not?
What would he do, if god forbid, you died?
Anonymous wrote:Not OP, but I think this question was directed for the HUSBANDS to give their opinions- not the wives "speaking for their husbands."
Husbands, please chime in before this turns into another hostile SAHM vs. WOHM thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm wondering why, in the high HHI scenarios being spoken of here, this is an either/or -- either the meals are cooked, house is clean, kids are cared for, clothes are washed/dry-cleaned, stress is low, and wife stays home, OR meals are takeout, house is messy, kids are on their own, stress is high, and wife works.
If you make a lot of money (let's say, top 1% in DC area) and wife's income would be "fraction" of yours, wouldn't you be able to outsource everything (nanny, cooking, housekeeping, laundry, errands, etc.) so that both of you work outside of the home but don't have to to the grunt work at home? Seems like this would actually be the ideal scenario. Two working parents in a high-income household minus the stress of cooking/cleaning/laundry/errands, with the added security of a second income for the "just in case" scenarios?
We tried outsourcing a lot so that we could maintain 2 busy professional careers. It is hard to outsource everything. And at some point, our children wanted us, not a hired third party. Of course it is easy to outsource the laundry. It is much harder to outsource the childcare when you have a sick child who wants you or you find out the night before that your child has a school performance the next day. For us, it came down to either getting 2 nannies or one of is cutting back/quitting. And I fully understand that is not a choice many would make or can make. But it works for us.
Why would you only find out the night before about a school performance? I work full time and yet receive the same emails the SAHMs do about school events. Sounds like you and your spouse were not very connected to the school community while WOH.
I am just using this as an example. There are lots of things that cannot be effectively outsourced. And, I guess I like doing some of that stuff. I don't want to outsource the cooking. I want to be the one to pick my kids up from school. I want to be able to see most of their school performances. I was unable to do these things when I worked.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can hire help but that doesn't mean it's actually that helpful. Believe me. No cleaning lady I've ever hired has ever done a good a job *consistently* as I would have done myself. It makes sense in a way. She's not the homeowner, she's only making about $20 an hour, maybe less. She's not as incentivized to really put some elbow grease in the job and scour every corner. But I don't want to do it myself all the time so I'm willing to put up with inconsistencies here and there. Same with other tasks.
But I could see how if you're hiring everything out and it's all a little slipshod and patchy how that would become extremely annoying really fast.
But here's what I don't get - I should scale back my career because my house is a little dirty? Again, if you don't enjoy your work, it's not important to your identity, you don't mind spending a lot of time managing the household and the family doesn't much care financially whether your work is paid, then sure. But I would have to be more than annoyed to give up my career. No man ever has quit because the household becomes a little slipshod and patchy.
Anonymous wrote:You can hire help but that doesn't mean it's actually that helpful. Believe me. No cleaning lady I've ever hired has ever done a good a job *consistently* as I would have done myself. It makes sense in a way. She's not the homeowner, she's only making about $20 an hour, maybe less. She's not as incentivized to really put some elbow grease in the job and scour every corner. But I don't want to do it myself all the time so I'm willing to put up with inconsistencies here and there. Same with other tasks.
But I could see how if you're hiring everything out and it's all a little slipshod and patchy how that would become extremely annoying really fast.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm wondering why, in the high HHI scenarios being spoken of here, this is an either/or -- either the meals are cooked, house is clean, kids are cared for, clothes are washed/dry-cleaned, stress is low, and wife stays home, OR meals are takeout, house is messy, kids are on their own, stress is high, and wife works.
If you make a lot of money (let's say, top 1% in DC area) and wife's income would be "fraction" of yours, wouldn't you be able to outsource everything (nanny, cooking, housekeeping, laundry, errands, etc.) so that both of you work outside of the home but don't have to to the grunt work at home? Seems like this would actually be the ideal scenario. Two working parents in a high-income household minus the stress of cooking/cleaning/laundry/errands, with the added security of a second income for the "just in case" scenarios?
We tried outsourcing a lot so that we could maintain 2 busy professional careers. It is hard to outsource everything. And at some point, our children wanted us, not a hired third party. Of course it is easy to outsource the laundry. It is much harder to outsource the childcare when you have a sick child who wants you or you find out the night before that your child has a school performance the next day. For us, it came down to either getting 2 nannies or one of is cutting back/quitting. And I fully understand that is not a choice many would make or can make. But it works for us.
Why would you only find out the night before about a school performance? I work full time and yet receive the same emails the SAHMs do about school events. Sounds like you and your spouse were not very connected to the school community while WOH.
Anonymous wrote:You can hire help but that doesn't mean it's actually that helpful. Believe me. No cleaning lady I've ever hired has ever done a good a job *consistently* as I would have done myself. It makes sense in a way. She's not the homeowner, she's only making about $20 an hour, maybe less. She's not as incentivized to really put some elbow grease in the job and scour every corner. But I don't want to do it myself all the time so I'm willing to put up with inconsistencies here and there. Same with other tasks.
But I could see how if you're hiring everything out and it's all a little slipshod and patchy how that would become extremely annoying really fast.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing how many WOHMs who have not stayed at home just have to chime in.
Insecure much?
It's basically ALL women chiming in. The question was for men.