Anonymous wrote:Years ago I read an article or biography that stated her breathy "little girl voice" was an affectation and her real speaking voice was much different. I'm sure anything we could find in a documentary or on YouTube would have the affectation.
The distinctive Kennedy accent is theirs alone. The pure Boston accent is much different, as is the upperclass Brahmin. As a wealthy daughter of a high-profile politician, Rose would have been taught elocution to mask anything that would make her sound "common."
Katharine Hepburn's is also atypical of what we would hear in Connecticut.
Anonymous wrote:I think the voice is somewhat contrived and what was expected of a woman of the time
Anonymous wrote:I don’t care how ‘posh’ or deliberate her speaking voice was, Jackie had a speech impediment & because she was the President’s wife, no one will admit to it. Nice lady, highly educated, probably the salt of the earth. But the timbor & announciation of her voice & words had a lot to be desired..
Anonymous wrote:I don’t care how ‘posh’ or deliberate her speaking voice was, Jackie had a speech impediment & because she was the President’s wife, no one will admit to it. Nice lady, highly educated, probably the salt of the earth. But the timbor & announciation of her voice & words had a lot to be desired..
Anonymous wrote:It's casually referred to as "Locust Valley lockjaw" - see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locust_Valley_lockjaw
Her speech is slow and deliberate on the White House tour but if you listen to the recordings of her interviews with Arthur Schlesinger (published as "Jacqueline Kennedy: Historic Conversations on Life with John F. Kennedy") you can hear what she sounded like in a more casual setting -- less deliberate, at times (but not always) less whispery, but still with an accent.
I doubt she was faking it -- she didn't have to.
Anonymous wrote:I think it makes her sound a bit slow or high on drugs. I don't find it appealing or cultured at all.