Anonymous wrote:If you are out of work for months, letting the nanny go makes sense (you may not be able to get that particular nanny back, because she will move on). If you are out of work for a few weeks to a month, I would think you would be able to pay the nanny out of savings for that short time. If not, maybe a nanny was not a viable option in the first instance.
Anonymous wrote:Average pay is 11
Anonymous wrote:Sorry guys, my last FT nanny job was $1,000. a week gross. I'm a professional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL I bet the angry nannies on this thread are going to sign up after seeing the salary and benefits.
Sign up for what?
Anonymous wrote:Now that Cantor has indicated House will pass back pay for fed workers, OP you will likely get paid (unless you are a contractor). Do you have so little in savings that you can't continue to pay nanny until you get a paycheck?
Anonymous wrote:LOL I bet the angry nannies on this thread are going to sign up after seeing the salary and benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Looks like a lot more people agree with cutting the nanny in this thread http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/334867.page
Anonymous wrote:if a nanny wants job security she would not be a nanny. it is not secure at all. people lose their jobs all the time or are transferred to a different location and they are out of a job. maybe they get 2 weeks notice, maybe they don't, I am sure it differs completely based on the individual.
it is just unfortunate that now this is happening to A LOT of people all at once
Anonymous wrote:LOL I bet the angry nannies on this thread are going to sign up after seeing the salary and benefits.