Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 35 and there is no way in hell I would date anyone over 42, max. My husband is 4 years older than me, at 39. That's about my limit. I can't believe all these people who think that 50, 55, 60, even 65 year old men can easily and regularly date women in their 20s and 30s. Gross.

I'm 48 and the last two guys I dated were 63.

Which means you are well, well beyond the age in question here, which is 20's and 30's.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 34 and I wouldn't give a 65 year old the time of day, are you kidding?

Exactly. I'm 30 and I wouldn't give a 45 year old the time of day. I find plenty of men in their 30s (and late 20s) to date, why would I want to date someone that much older? I would make an exception for someone who was a great match with me, but women are not so desperate that they have to date men that much older. This goes for all of my 30 year old friends.

You and all of your 30 year old friends are single, at 30. Your risk of having a downie starts increasing now. Good luck.

Don't listen to that guy. DH and I had three kids spanning conception ages from 35 to 42. All are just fine. Poster sounds like he's 65 with completely out of date data -- proving that you should stick to a better informed guy in his 30s.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 48 and I just banged a 26 year old this weekend!

How much did she charge?

I paid her! All in the technique, baby!

Anonymous wrote:I'm 30 and wouldn't date 45 either. My parents just cracked 50 this year, so that might have something to do with it. I prefer men late 20s to mid 30s. I think dating late 30s is being open enough, but I really prefer not to.

Wise choice. Dating a peer is likelier to bring happiness through things in common. The last thing an independent woman needs is someone even remotely "parental."

Anonymous wrote:I'm 48 and I just banged a 26 year old this weekend!

How much did she charge?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.

"sexual stride" is a madeup term. Women in their 20s are much hotter and more fertile.

Same for men.

Not really. Men's attractiveness depends on many factors, of which looks is only one. Accomplishments, money, maturity, education are very important to most women. We're talking about dating here. Women's attractiveness depends mainly on looks and youth.

So men probably peak lookswise at 25-30, but their other criteria are increasing after that. Meanwhile, women peak lookswise at 25 at the latest, and that's the main criteria. Your professional accomplishments don't mean anything to a man, though he does want someone with a degree (something which is decided by 22).

A man's resume can only do so much. A beer gut is a beer gut and the same goes for saggy balls. A woman in her 20s/30s can still get a handsome guy with money and education of similar age.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per my closest guy friend, I supposedly think like a guy. Most guys around 40 are starting to let themselves go. I don't want to walk into that.

how do you think like a guy

My ideal guy is 28-35 (I'm 30). I have dated men older than that in a quest to be openminded, but deep down I am concerned about how many years they have left of attractiveness and I'd prefer not to have kids with someone older. I was dating someone recently who looks great on paper (well educated, excellent money, live of work compliments mine, nice guy) but I commented to my friend that based on his age, this is probably as good as it's going to get (he's overweight) and I'm scared he might get bigger. FYI, I don't agree with my friend. I attract young guys all the friggin time (early/mid 20s) and they're hot, but I can't deal with them once they open their mouths. I don't get why a woman my age would be interested in a guy who has probably slept around for decades, lived as an overgrown kid, and now wants to settle down with someone much younger. If I were to go older, I'd much prefer someone divorced with a kid, at least it means he's committed to something in his life before. Ending up with someone who was in HS when you were born just sounds like a raw deal. Sure, a guy in his mid 40s now might be doable now, but certainly not when he's entering retirement and I have several years of work ahead of me.

Anonymous wrote:I have noticed that the "perfect" age difference between men and women seems to be 16 years, the man being the older one. Whenever you hear about a man leaving his wife for a younger woman, the age difference always seems to be about 16 years -- I do not know why this is.

So under my theory, a man cannot start to date his "perfect" match until he is at least 35; and can no longer date a woman in her early 30s or younger once he is older than 48 years.

so stupid

I have noticed that the "perfect" age difference between men and women seems to be 16 years, the man being the older one. Whenever you hear about a man leaving his wife for a younger woman, the age difference always seems to be about 16 years -- I do not know why this is.

So under my theory, a man cannot start to date his "perfect" match until he is at least 35; and can no longer date a woman in her early 30s or younger once he is older than 48 years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 35 and would not go lower than 35 or older than 48 and not shorter than 6'1" or heavier than 190.

However that is me. I'm not the dating police so I say date who you want. Hugh Hefner is fine by me. He's gonna die happy.

6'1?? Good luck with that, excluding 90% of men off the bat

Well I'm married to one 6'3" and never have dated a guy shorter than me when I've been in heels and I'm 5'10". Its never been hard to find tall fit guy which was always a minimum criteria.

Um you're married. How long has it been since you dated? Your pool at 35 is probably different than it was at 25.

Widow here. I got remarried at 38 and I have two kids-so I've dated to marry twice. It was not exactly hard finding a tall and fit guy. Goes a long way when you don't give up on your body after having kids. Especially with me being 5'10", I cannot afford to get out of shape or else I will look like a huge Oaf.

C**ts.

"Guys seem to dig the 40ish milfs who look good but really know their way around in the sack. No inhibitions."

+ There is nothing as hot as Revenge Sex!!
Much better than the Pity Fucks wives throw to their Beta husbands.

Anonymous wrote:Per my closest guy friend, I supposedly think like a guy. Most guys around 40 are starting to let themselves go. I don't want to walk into that.

Most women 40 plus have butts the size of the Nimitz and pendulous watermelon sacks where tits used to be. Eeeeeewwwwww!!!

I'm 48 and I just banged a 26 year old this weekend!

Anonymous wrote:Guys seem to dig the 40ish milfs who look good but really know their way around in the sack. No inhibitions.

My experience with an older man was.... he needed some (ahem) assistance in the virility dept. Women don't have that problem. A little lube and you are good to go.

It's not just the virility...old men with their crape-y skin, dandruff, balding head, hair growing from their ears, dentures...eewww!