Anonymous wrote:We are having this child regardless of any health problems. Abortion is completely off the table and finding DS, or any chromosomal issue would not change that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:obviously accidental. The age concern is an issue to us. We are looking into open adoption.
Now I know you are a COMPLETE weirdo. Holy sh*t.
1) 56 and pregnant
2) rude responses despite shamelessness of AMA thread about it
3) giving baby up for freaking adoption (when not necessary).
wow. just wow.
I don't think that it's weird to consider open adoption at all. To be honest, I would probably have considered abortion if I was in her shoes.
IMHO, if a otherwise capable and SES stable family does not feel up to parenting another child and chooses adoption over abortion, that is an incredibly selfless thing to do. There is a lot of stigma around adoption, everyone will know about the baby, ask about the baby, etc., and it is hard to say honestly we are not up for this, our family is complete and while I love this child I think the best thing for this child is to give him/her up for adoption. She is talking about an open adoption. My hat is off to OP.
I guess I disagree. If I were the kid, to learn down the road that my birth family was "capable and SES stable" yet still gave me away . .. yikes! That would cause some serious trauma/anger issues, I think.
Unless you also learned that your birth parents were in their fifties when you were born and wanted you to have a more typical childhood and parents. Also, the OP is looking into open adoption, which means (I believe) that the child would know about and possibly have a relationship with OP and her husband. I think adoption is a selfless and beautiful thing that humans can do for one another. OP, I wish you and your family a lot of luck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:obviously accidental. The age concern is an issue to us. We are looking into open adoption.
Now I know you are a COMPLETE weirdo. Holy sh*t.
1) 56 and pregnant
2) rude responses despite shamelessness of AMA thread about it
3) giving baby up for freaking adoption (when not necessary).
wow. just wow.
I don't think that it's weird to consider open adoption at all. To be honest, I would probably have considered abortion if I was in her shoes.
Anonymous wrote:Cold hearted? Why. We are looking at open adoption. So the child will always know its "family" but won't be uprooted as we age. And yes, we are 15 weeks. Just told the kids this week.
Anonymous wrote:In light of the circumstances, it seems odd to me that they would have discussed this with their children when only at 6 weeks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone depends on someone, but as pps have said, it is very likely that we may not be around/able bodied before the kid is 18. most people have someone to depend on, but as it stands, it looks inevitable that the child will need care other than our own anyway.
How do your older children feel about it?
They feel that we have been good parents to them, they think we could raise another, but the eldest supports our choice of adoption
Is your eldest male or female?
male