Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's so interesting about this debate is that in truth we are talking about just a few slots in elementary school. There are so many sibling slots already, very few people will get into the early grades without a sibling preference. But in reading arguments on both sides is clear that the real problem is that there are too few spaces on the Hill for high quality education. And when you get beyond the elementary level, there are just none.
For those of us who like living on the Hill it is distressing to think that the best public school option is Stuart Hobson, which has a number of major problems and is still closed to graduates from Brent, Tyler, Maury, and likely SWS. And the DCPS treatment of SWS (moving it out of the Cluster with really poor communication, changing it from a neighborhood school to a citywide school) is distressing. If it can't figure this out, I'm very worried about middle school and beyond.
The REAL problem is that there are too few spaces in good schools, elementary and other, across the city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's so interesting about this debate is that in truth we are talking about just a few slots in elementary school. There are so many sibling slots already, very few people will get into the early grades without a sibling preference. But in reading arguments on both sides is clear that the real problem is that there are too few spaces on the Hill for high quality education. And when you get beyond the elementary level, there are just none.
For those of us who like living on the Hill it is distressing to think that the best public school option is Stuart Hobson, which has a number of major problems and is still closed to graduates from Brent, Tyler, Maury, and likely SWS. And the DCPS treatment of SWS (moving it out of the Cluster with really poor communication, changing it from a neighborhood school to a citywide school) is distressing. If it can't figure this out, I'm very worried about middle school and beyond.
The REAL problem is that there are too few spaces in good schools, elementary and other, across the city.
Anonymous wrote:Both problems are real - most Hill elementary schools serving many more Ward 7 and 8 kids than Hill kids AND bleak neighborhood middle school options. A city-wide lottery for SWS will help a few families off the Hill without fixing either problem. Nothing to get excited about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's so interesting about this debate is that in truth we are talking about just a few slots in elementary school. There are so many sibling slots already, very few people will get into the early grades without a sibling preference. But in reading arguments on both sides is clear that the real problem is that there are too few spaces on the Hill for high quality education. And when you get beyond the elementary level, there are just none.
For those of us who like living on the Hill it is distressing to think that the best public school option is Stuart Hobson, which has a number of major problems and is still closed to graduates from Brent, Tyler, Maury, and likely SWS. And the DCPS treatment of SWS (moving it out of the Cluster with really poor communication, changing it from a neighborhood school to a citywide school) is distressing. If it can't figure this out, I'm very worried about middle school and beyond.
The REAL problem is that there are too few spaces in good schools, elementary and other, across the city.
YES. Exactly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rember when SWS made up their own admittance rules? Like OOB siblings could reserve spots then the IB kids got to fight for the left overs?
Those were the days.
Remember when SWS shared a building with the rest of Peabody, and you had 3 floors of black and brown children and then a penthouse full of white children where even the walls were pale?
You mean like Tyler SI now? And please explain to this board what prevented anyone of color from enrolling in SWS (or Tyler SI today). Is/was there race based admission? You really seem to have a nuanced perspective on this. Please share your many insights.
Or is this is the kind of pointless snide and passive aggressive banter synomous with DCUM
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's so interesting about this debate is that in truth we are talking about just a few slots in elementary school. There are so many sibling slots already, very few people will get into the early grades without a sibling preference. But in reading arguments on both sides is clear that the real problem is that there are too few spaces on the Hill for high quality education. And when you get beyond the elementary level, there are just none.
For those of us who like living on the Hill it is distressing to think that the best public school option is Stuart Hobson, which has a number of major problems and is still closed to graduates from Brent, Tyler, Maury, and likely SWS. And the DCPS treatment of SWS (moving it out of the Cluster with really poor communication, changing it from a neighborhood school to a citywide school) is distressing. If it can't figure this out, I'm very worried about middle school and beyond.
The REAL problem is that there are too few spaces in good schools, elementary and other, across the city.
Anonymous wrote:What's so interesting about this debate is that in truth we are talking about just a few slots in elementary school. There are so many sibling slots already, very few people will get into the early grades without a sibling preference. But in reading arguments on both sides is clear that the real problem is that there are too few spaces on the Hill for high quality education. And when you get beyond the elementary level, there are just none.
For those of us who like living on the Hill it is distressing to think that the best public school option is Stuart Hobson, which has a number of major problems and is still closed to graduates from Brent, Tyler, Maury, and likely SWS. And the DCPS treatment of SWS (moving it out of the Cluster with really poor communication, changing it from a neighborhood school to a citywide school) is distressing. If it can't figure this out, I'm very worried about middle school and beyond.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:C'mon now how long can young gentrifiers stay young? This has been going on for atleast 10 years and not a single nary budge. Really, how hard is it to have Eliot-Hine retooled but what has DCPS done but ignore the gentrifiers outcry and kept it the same.
Sure you buy a house in Ward 6 but theres a family moving into the projects of Ward 6 everyday. The gentrifiers move in and have a baby and there is the project family moving with 3 to 4 school age children.
So who does DCPS turn to at the moment, it is not rocket science, people? A school system that has a majority of AA will be the primary focus for the future because the past has shown that our gentrifiers will never catch-up.
It is not that the city doesn't cares but they are not concern because gentrifiers are replacing gentrifiers.
I think the city cares deeply about gentrifiers. They may have fewer kids, but they provide lots more tax revenue!
The city also knows that gentrifiers will literally go out of their way (while staying in DC) to improve their kids' education. They will trek to a distant OB school or charter they get into or even move closer once they get in!
So knowing that the city supports more charters (see today's Emma Brown article), why would the city do anything right now to make neighborhood schools more attractive to parents?
The city sure does care about gentrifiers, and no they are not just replacing other gentrifiers. It wasn't too long ago that Adams Morgan was considered a bad neighborhood for families, edgy for young people moving to DC for internships. Fast forward 10 or 12 years and now there are gentrifiers in places no gentrifier had previously even heard of: Shaw, Bloomingdale, Brookland, Petworth, Eckington, Navy Yards... Dog parks, and bike lanes, and streetcars, oh my!