Anonymous wrote:I think we agree. Few people move out only because of schools although it is a convenient reason to give. My point is that shipping kids out of the neighborhood for charters or out of the public system for school is far from the ideal especially when the numbers and conditions for some great middle and high school options in the neighborhood are gathering. But maybe I am too idealistic. In the meantime, yes, there are lots of good enough options in the city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The history of the Hill is middle class kids going to Deal if they stayed in DCPS.
That's a newer trend. I'd say about when Rhee came in and put Kim in place there. You're talking five years max. Hardy maybe, yes, not Deal.
This is just not true. Students on the Hill have been trekking to Deal for a long time. Before the Cluster was formed parents avoided Hine, but some considered Jefferson in the late 80s and 90s. The Cluster was formed to entice middle class parents to stick around, and Jefferson was essentially a selective admission program with a tough as nails principal.
I think it is funny how the generation of parents who were around during the beginning of the cluster won't admit that the reason for the cluster was to entice middle class families and make them feel more comfortable through middle school yet when anyone suggests something similar these days they squawk and cluck elitism and racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The history of the Hill is middle class kids going to Deal if they stayed in DCPS.
That's a newer trend. I'd say about when Rhee came in and put Kim in place there. You're talking five years max. Hardy maybe, yes, not Deal.
This is just not true. Students on the Hill have been trekking to Deal for a long time. Before the Cluster was formed parents avoided Hine, but some considered Jefferson in the late 80s and 90s. The Cluster was formed to entice middle class parents to stick around, and Jefferson was essentially a selective admission program with a tough as nails principal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^ I think this is simplistic but would love to hear your conspiracy theory. These families you talk about were much fewer in number and there houses were far cheaper. So the possibility of private schools through high school was there. Also, Stuart Hobson did not have a feed from Ludlow Taylor or from JO Wilson . It was essentially a magnet school drawing in motivated families and a few graduates from Watkins. Things have changed--especially with charter schools drawing away many motivated and academically oriented students.
You are talking about an era when the only public elementary school that served middle class kids from the immediate neighborhood was Watkins. Now there are large numbers of these families at Brent, Tyler, Maury and at preschool at Ludlow and JO Wilson.
With large mortgages and large families and simultaneously valuing public education and strong neighborhoods, these families rightfully long for a public middle school and even high school. However--middle school brings issues that are not in play at the elementary level and these need to be addressed by the city and by DCPS before this can work.
In the meantime, yes, families will use the charters and privates but that is far from ideal.
My point exactly. Many, many more acceptable choices. A possibly more demanding clientele with a little less fungible cash to put towards privates, if even that. Schools are not primarily the reason they move out - if they do -, is where my conclusion possibly differs from yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The history of the Hill is middle class kids going to Deal if they stayed in DCPS.
That's a newer trend. I'd say about when Rhee came in and put Kim in place there. You're talking five years max. Hardy maybe, yes, not Deal.
Anonymous wrote:^^^ I think this is simplistic but would love to hear your conspiracy theory. These families you talk about were much fewer in number and there houses were far cheaper. So the possibility of private schools through high school was there. Also, Stuart Hobson did not have a feed from Ludlow Taylor or from JO Wilson . It was essentially a magnet school drawing in motivated families and a few graduates from Watkins. Things have changed--especially with charter schools drawing away many motivated and academically oriented students.
You are talking about an era when the only public elementary school that served middle class kids from the immediate neighborhood was Watkins. Now there are large numbers of these families at Brent, Tyler, Maury and at preschool at Ludlow and JO Wilson.
With large mortgages and large families and simultaneously valuing public education and strong neighborhoods, these families rightfully long for a public middle school and even high school. However--middle school brings issues that are not in play at the elementary level and these need to be addressed by the city and by DCPS before this can work.
In the meantime, yes, families will use the charters and privates but that is far from ideal.
Anonymous wrote:The history of the Hill is middle class kids going to Deal if they stayed in DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:I too think the MS issue is greatly overplayed (I have some conspiracy theory about that but let's not go there). For decades, Capitol Hill parents have made a living in Capitol Hill, a great many - lawyers, professors, public servants, business owners - quietly but successfully investing in Stuart-Hobson or sending their kids to St. Peters or St. Anselms. As numbers have increased so have choices, public and private. In fact, today's elementary school parents probably have more and better choices for ES and MS than those barely a decade ago.
No, those who're drawn away are so because they're looking for bigger doorways, wider lawns, double garages, newer detached homes, and possibly, quite possibly, more of their kind. Some will tell you, and probably make themselves believe, that's it's the schools. Other reasons just doesn't ring right in this city. But many are honest if you ask them sincerely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am familiar with Brent and JKLMM schools. I don't think it is laughable to consider them similar. There are differences, mostly related to middle schools, but they both are able to produce well prepared kids. Kids from Brent go on to St Anselm's, Latin, BASIS, Cap Hill Day School and others and they make the honor roll from day one. There are differences in the culture and climate and community surrounding these schools, and some may like one over the other. I'd be interested in hearing the PP's rationale for using such strong language to describe why Brent is not comparable to JKLMM.
Some JKLM types are having trouble dealing with the fact that Brent's demographics and academics will soon be comparable to theirs, right downtown, in the hip zone, despite the problem MS feeder. Maury will struggle a bit to compare, even in 5 years, because its school district has bigger pockets of poverty. The irony is that not only is Brent poised to become a branch of JKLM EotP, it's veering toward WotP crowding.