Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question from a 'newbie': DC has been taking gymnastics casually and 'for fun' for several years on and off but has always had an interest and some proficiency. In order to compete at the USAG or MDL level, would a gymnast have to have 'started' the level of serious practice I'm reading about here at a much younger age (DC will be 8 this year)? I don't want to encourage the interest in pre-team and team if, frankly, there is no chance that DC will ultimately end up participating at that level. This isn't about protecting a snowflake -- this is about whether DC would learn as much and enjoy the sport as much if she were strictly taking classes 'for fun' as opposed to taking classes with a potential aim of participating in a team. My bottom-line question is whether starting training/preparing seriously at age 8 can lead at all to participating in a competitive team. TIA
My son was 9 when he started and competes at the USAG level. He progressed very rapidly. It's a huge commitment though - 14 hours a week in the gym minimum, often more, plus another 2 of private coaching.
Anonymous wrote:Question from a 'newbie': DC has been taking gymnastics casually and 'for fun' for several years on and off but has always had an interest and some proficiency. In order to compete at the USAG or MDL level, would a gymnast have to have 'started' the level of serious practice I'm reading about here at a much younger age (DC will be 8 this year)? I don't want to encourage the interest in pre-team and team if, frankly, there is no chance that DC will ultimately end up participating at that level. This isn't about protecting a snowflake -- this is about whether DC would learn as much and enjoy the sport as much if she were strictly taking classes 'for fun' as opposed to taking classes with a potential aim of participating in a team. My bottom-line question is whether starting training/preparing seriously at age 8 can lead at all to participating in a competitive team. TIA
Anonymous wrote:Question from a 'newbie': DC has been taking gymnastics casually and 'for fun' for several years on and off but has always had an interest and some proficiency. In order to compete at the USAG or MDL level, would a gymnast have to have 'started' the level of serious practice I'm reading about here at a much younger age (DC will be 8 this year)? I don't want to encourage the interest in pre-team and team if, frankly, there is no chance that DC will ultimately end up participating at that level. This isn't about protecting a snowflake -- this is about whether DC would learn as much and enjoy the sport as much if she were strictly taking classes 'for fun' as opposed to taking classes with a potential aim of participating in a team. My bottom-line question is whether starting training/preparing seriously at age 8 can lead at all to participating in a competitive team. TIA
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are saying that you really want your daughter to do this? (the Korbut flip). How much of this is you being a dance mom and pushing your kid to do dangerous maneuvers? This is another concussion waiting to happen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZYPcdj_wn4
You seem to be missing the point. NO ONE DOES THIS ANY MORE. I don't really care one way or another because bars has evolved in a different direction, that isn't compatible with this skill, and that is why it is not in the current code. I'm really not sure why posters on this thread are obsessed with it. Concussions aren't a serious problem in gymnastics as compared to other sports like football, but there are elements of comparable and greater difficulty (and therefore risk) to the Korbut flip being performed today. Much more complex releases. If you want to hysterically panic about risks, then what you're looking at more realistically is elbow dislocation, not concussions. And elbow dislocation is a terrible injury in someone over preschool age, so I'm not pulling any punches here. I'm a realistic person. Injuries are a part of this sport, but they're also part of every other sport done on a comparable level. I just don't understand hysterical posts about nonsense about how dangerous Korbut flips are. That's not even applicable to anything. If your hypothesis was true (and it's not, because again, the real issue is that FIG bars have evolved in another direction) it would only prove anyway that gymnastics associations are risk averse and constantly evolving in their risk management practices (this is true anyway).
Anonymous wrote:So you are saying that you really want your daughter to do this? (the Korbut flip). How much of this is you being a dance mom and pushing your kid to do dangerous maneuvers? This is another concussion waiting to happen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZYPcdj_wn4

Anonymous wrote:Looks like somebody hit their head one too many times!
