Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:155 NNAT, 99% FAT: DC rejected. Not overly surprised because DC is shy, does not participate in class and report card has 3s and 2s. Also English is not first language.
Insane! Those are such good scores. Do you know the GBRS??? Screening file should have indicated that English was not the first language.
This is what prepping does. Not saying the scores were prepped, but the high scores with lower GBRS indicates prep.
We didn't know about the APP programme until after the test. We came to US 2 years ago from South America. A friend told me to go on this site for information and FAQs. I don't know what GBRS is and I didn't know that our child had to prepare for that. We know our child is very intelligent, learned English fast and very good playing music instruments and chess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of these parent referrals with lowish NNAT/FxAT scores and stellar WISC full scale IQ's are telling me that the standardized tests used by Fairfax are not so hot at picking out the kids who kick butt on the gold standard of IQ testing (WISC). It means a lot of kids who just missed the pool are SOL (and I'm not talking about George Bush's educational initiative) simply because there parents don't know about or can't afford to pay for a privately-administered WISC.
But you just told them. The thread should be re-named the "AAP Eligible letter received or Invitation to Tout the WISC" thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:155 NNAT, 99% FAT: DC rejected. Not overly surprised because DC is shy, does not participate in class and report card has 3s and 2s. Also English is not first language.
Insane! Those are such good scores. Do you know the GBRS??? Screening file should have indicated that English was not the first language.
This is what prepping does. Not saying the scores were prepped, but the high scores with lower GBRS indicates prep.
I know it's been alleged that TJ rejects for apparent prepping, but now the AAP committee?
And yes they should!
Anonymous wrote:No drama opening the letter, because I could see the edge of the blue form through the address window (and knew this meant acceptance):
NNAT 126
FxAT overall 89 (verbal 99; quant 73, nonverbal 73)
GBRS 12
Parent referred (not in pool) with WISC Full Scale of 137 (with VCI of 146).
Good luck everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Some of these parent referrals with lowish NNAT/FxAT scores and stellar WISC full scale IQ's are telling me that the standardized tests used by Fairfax are not so hot at picking out the kids who kick butt on the gold standard of IQ testing (WISC). It means a lot of kids who just missed the pool are SOL (and I'm not talking about George Bush's educational initiative) simply because there parents don't know about or can't afford to pay for a privately-administered WISC.
Anonymous wrote:Some of these parent referrals with lowish NNAT/FxAT scores and stellar WISC full scale IQ's are telling me that the standardized tests used by Fairfax are not so hot at picking out the kids who kick butt on the gold standard of IQ testing (WISC). It means a lot of kids who just missed the pool are SOL (and I'm not talking about George Bush's educational initiative) simply because there parents don't know about or can't afford to pay for a privately-administered WISC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:155 NNAT, 99% FAT: DC rejected. Not overly surprised because DC is shy, does not participate in class and report card has 3s and 2s. Also English is not first language.
Insane! Those are such good scores. Do you know the GBRS??? Screening file should have indicated that English was not the first language.
This is what prepping does. Not saying the scores were prepped, but the high scores with lower GBRS indicates prep.
I know it's been alleged that TJ rejects for apparent prepping, but now the AAP committee?
Anonymous wrote:Does letter indicate level 3 services
Anonymous wrote:Just curious, what color paper came with the acceptance letters, blue or yellow? Both have been reported. Is the one posting blue a troll?
Anonymous wrote:Just curious, what color paper came with the acceptance letters, blue or yellow? Both have been reported. Is the one posting blue a troll?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:155 NNAT, 99% FAT: DC rejected. Not overly surprised because DC is shy, does not participate in class and report card has 3s and 2s. Also English is not first language.
Insane! Those are such good scores. Do you know the GBRS??? Screening file should have indicated that English was not the first language.
This is what prepping does. Not saying the scores were prepped, but the high scores with lower GBRS indicates prep.