Oklahoma City bombing initially attributed to Middle Easterners by CNN.

Anonymous wrote:Watching the news and they say the authorities are watching a "person of interest" at the hospital, but they have not yet determined if this person is a victim or the perpetrator.

Brown people are "persons of interest" by default.

Watching the news and they say the authorities are watching a "person of interest" at the hospital, but they have not yet determined if this person is a victim or the perpetrator.

It pisses me off every time I drive by the mosque on Mass. Ave. and think of the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. The minaret is almost a raised middle finger in the middle of Washington, DC.

This is not pertinent to this discussion nor is it appropriate in our country. I am as conservative as they come and I am appalled when I hear people make these types of comments. We are still a nation which purports to respect religious freedom and that includes Muslims. Please do not jump to conclusions about who instigated these attacks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It pisses me off every time I drive by the mosque on Mass. Ave. and think of the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. The minaret is almost a raised middle finger in the middle of Washington, DC.

It's a little early to reach this level of douchebaggery on this topic. Wait a day or two please.

He's simply angry re: the dead from 9/11. Quite appropriate, given it WAS Middle-Eastern radicals who committed that atrocity. Feel free to revise history if you choose.

Yes, of course. But most terrorism in the US is committed by domestic terrorists. FAR more fatalities caused by domestic terrorists.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/authorities_under_suspect_guard_y2m8cJO29uC2PDGIjYBalO?utm_source=SFnewyorkpost&utm_medium=SFnewyorkpost

This is a tabloid newspaper and not an actual source, with several false information within the article.

BPD just said 10 minutes ago that not a single person is in custody.

Yet they seemed to get it right re: the JFK Library....hmmmm

And didn't a tabloid break the John Edwards case?

It's usually the tabloid press that knows how to work the police sources.

The big "respectable" national papers don't have the same police blotter coverage -- not too many reporters from the Crimson or the Prince' are night court rats.

pp here .. "this tool" meaning the dork quoted by the eloquent one I quoted ("for fucks sake" says it all).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/authorities_under_suspect_guard_y2m8cJO29uC2PDGIjYBalO?utm_source=SFnewyorkpost&utm_medium=SFnewyorkpost

This is a tabloid newspaper and not an actual source, with several false information within the article.

BPD just said 10 minutes ago that not a single person is in custody.

Yet they seemed to get it right re: the JFK Library....hmmmm

And didn't a tabloid break the John Edwards case?

Trust me, I hate, HATE Saudi Arabia as much as any ex-Muslim woman can hate Saudi Arabia, but this is really insane. But if you want to use your racism and bigotry to support the script already written in your head, go ahead. It won't change the outcome. If it's domestic, you'll just say it's a cover-up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It pisses me off every time I drive by the mosque on Mass. Ave. and think of the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. The minaret is almost a raised middle finger in the middle of Washington, DC.

Oh for fucks sake.

things crawl out from under rocks whenever there's an explosion... this tool is one apparently.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It pisses me off every time I drive by the mosque on Mass. Ave. and think of the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. The minaret is almost a raised middle finger in the middle of Washington, DC.

It's a little early to reach this level of douchebaggery on this topic. Wait a day or two please.

He's simply angry re: the dead from 9/11. Quite appropriate, given it WAS Middle-Eastern radicals who committed that atrocity. Feel free to revise history if you choose.

Anonymous wrote:It pisses me off every time I drive by the mosque on Mass. Ave. and think of the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. The minaret is almost a raised middle finger in the middle of Washington, DC.

Oh for fucks sake.

Anonymous wrote:It pisses me off every time I drive by the mosque on Mass. Ave. and think of the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. The minaret is almost a raised middle finger in the middle of Washington, DC.

It's a little early to reach this level of douchebaggery on this topic. Wait a day or two please.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/authorities_under_suspect_guard_y2m8cJO29uC2PDGIjYBalO?utm_source=SFnewyorkpost&utm_medium=SFnewyorkpost

This is a tabloid newspaper and not an actual source, with several false information within the article.

BPD just said 10 minutes ago that not a single person is in custody.

Yet they seemed to get it right re: the JFK Library....hmmmm

And didn't a tabloid break the John Edwards case?

It pisses me off every time I drive by the mosque on Mass. Ave. and think of the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. The minaret is almost a raised middle finger in the middle of Washington, DC.

There is a suspect who is being guarded at Mass General. Can't remember which news source. No mention of nationality.