Anonymous wrote:I personally think Ms Really Really Early is a troll, and come Friday she's going to proclaim to everyone how RIGHT she was, and what a GREAT wl number she has.

Leave Ms. Really Really early alone. She/he is just trying to add some humor to this Stone Factory!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I applied really early last year...BUT...my WL was above 60.

Sounds like you we're duped. Not me! I'm sure I was really really early!

Ms. "really really early" you are getting tediously annoying. Do you have a good back-up plan?

Geez you people are uptight and hateful!

My back up plan is to get in with your child's slot. Since I'm from PG, I plan to doubly piss you off!

I personally think Ms Really Really Early is a troll, and come Friday she's going to proclaim to everyone how RIGHT she was, and what a GREAT wl number she has.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I applied really early last year...BUT...my WL was above 60.

Sounds like you we're duped. Not me! I'm sure I was really really early!

Ms. "really really early" you are getting tediously annoying. Do you have a good back-up plan?

Geez you people are uptight and hateful!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I applied really early last year...BUT...my WL was above 60.

Sounds like you we're duped. Not me! I'm sure I was really really early!

Maybe...But my child attends Stokes now. How about your child?

My child is better than your child! But, seriously, you're a troll. No way a WL number of 60 means you got in, liar!

Is a troll. I refuse to respond to the nonsense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I applied really early last year...BUT...my WL was above 60.

Sounds like you we're duped. Not me! I'm sure I was really really early!

Ms. "really really early" you are getting tediously annoying. Do you have a good back-up plan?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I applied really early last year...BUT...my WL was above 60.

Sounds like you we're duped. Not me! I'm sure I was really really early!

Maybe...But my child attends Stokes now. How about your child?

How many slots were there last year for k. Anyone know? TIA

Anonymous wrote:K is having a lottery. Just got an email.

Do they say for how many spots?

Anonymous wrote:I applied really early last year...BUT...my WL was above 60.

Sounds like you we're duped. Not me! I'm sure I was really really early!

K is having a lottery. Just got an email.

I applied really early last year...BUT...my WL was above 60.

Wonder if we can convince then to open up a Stokes II!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how there have been about 30 people on this forum in the last few months who have said they are SURE they are in the top 10 based on when they submitted their application. Everybody can't be right. And that's assuming you trust the system to begin with.

At least 20 of the people are me. I'm not getting the answers I want, so I keep re-putting it back out there. Sorry!

While we all wish you the best, it's impossible to know your chances on the waitlist when nobody knows what the numbers are going to look like because of the crash. You might think you have a low single digit number, but there is no way to know for sure until the list comes out. All the speculation in the world is not going to help you.

Agreed. And while I'm sure there will be tons of Stokes supporters who say "no way, everything is on the up and up!" hasn't it crossed anyone's mind that because there was a crash it provides an easy explanation when your waitlist number is no where near where you thought it would be? If there are friends of admin or teachers' children who want a spot, I would not be surprised to find those children at the top of the waitlist. Anyway, PP who posted 20 times about how confident you are of your waitlist number, please post back later this week to let us know how it worked out.