Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Received CogAT today in the mail along with in-pool letter (in same envelope).
Which school?
Anonymous wrote:Sure seems as though they are deliberately trying to hide the data...will be really interesting if the pool and ultimately the AAP classes of next year are significantly lower in population as compared to this year's 3rd grade....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Historically, chances of acceptance are higher when you factor in additional testing, pool or no pool.
Does WISC override lower CogAT, if WISC is very significantly higher?
Anonymous wrote:Received the CogAT today... basically a PowerPoint with a screenshot of The local percentile ranks. Does not explain anything, as previous CogATs have. Am considering a visit to Gatehouse to ask for more detailed data. THe form is missing the standard age score, stanine, and percentile ranks; additionally, the form is missing the number of items, number attempted, and number correct. I may need to email my cluster super or school board member to find out where the rest of the report is. FCPS has a major fustercluck, again!
Anonymous wrote:Historically, chances of acceptance are higher when you factor in additional testing, pool or no pool.

Anonymous wrote:Received CogAT today in the mail along with in-pool letter (in same envelope).
Anonymous wrote:And there is no composite score listed in Addn to percentile? Supremely annoying, why is the county trying to make this process so shrouded in secrecy? Can someone in the pool please ask your AART what composite score was benchmark this year????
Anonymous wrote:But statistically/historically your chances of acceptance are somewhat less if you are parent-referred versus in the pool, if only because your test scores are lower, so it seems understandable to want to be in the pool.