Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are "friends of Akin?" You can be staunch pro-life and think that Akin is a complete douche who should be out of the race.
I can't respond to your hypothetical because it is just hypothetical. To think there will be a perfect storm where all this happens at once is out of the realm of possibility.
I'm in total agreement with what you've written. Personally, I don't know anyone who could support him. [/quotehttps://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/524436_250081521779901_562314304_n.jpg.[/img]
Anonymous wrote:NP here. First, I don't think all abortion should be illegal. But the OP's post is pretty silly. It assumes that it's the government's responsibility to provide not just a safety net (which is fine, and I have not heard anyone lobbying to remove) but everything for the kid-- food, childcare, housing, etc.
In the OP's scenario, replace "unwanted pregnant" with "have a six month old and it's so much harder than I thought" and the mom can't make ends meet. Is the solution still to end the life of the child? If no, why not? How is having an unwanted infant different from having an unwanted fetus or embryo? You will say because someone else can care for the child, but that's no different from giving birth then relinquishing the child.
Anyway, the answer would be, what people did before Obamacare (which is brand new, so I'm not sure why people act like not having it is taking away some long-standing right): get help from charities and friends/family, and go on Welfare/kids on Medicaid. I'm not saying this is ideal at all. But it is not starving to death in the street.
Anonymous wrote:Adoption.
Anonymous wrote:NP here. First, I don't think all abortion should be illegal. But the OP's post is pretty silly. It assumes that it's the government's responsibility to provide not just a safety net (which is fine, and I have not heard anyone lobbying to remove) but everything for the kid-- food, childcare, housing, etc.
In the OP's scenario, replace "unwanted pregnant" with "have a six month old and it's so much harder than I thought" and the mom can't make ends meet. Is the solution still to end the life of the child? If no, why not? How is having an unwanted infant different from having an unwanted fetus or embryo? You will say because someone else can care for the child, but that's no different from giving birth then relinquishing the child.
Anyway, the answer would be, what people did before Obamacare (which is brand new, so I'm not sure why people act like not having it is taking away some long-standing right): get help from charities and friends/family, and go on Welfare/kids on Medicaid. I'm not saying this is ideal at all. But it is not starving to death in the street.
Anonymous wrote:
I am sure the working poor, who has little or no job flexibility and no health insurance do get pregnant and have complications. Abortion is still legal, Planned Parenthood is still funded and there is still publicly funded health care. I just don't see all of those going away overnight even if Akin ( you know he isn't running for President right? Romney doesn't have the same view as Akin) wins.
Anonymous wrote:
I can't respond to your hypothetical because it is just hypothetical. To think there will be a perfect storm where all this happens at once is out of the realm of possibility.
Anonymous wrote:Who are "friends of Akin?" You can be staunch pro-life and think that Akin is a complete douche who should be out of the race.
I can't respond to your hypothetical because it is just hypothetical. To think there will be a perfect storm where all this happens at once is out of the realm of possibility.
Anonymous wrote:Okay, since there are so many arguments against the details of OP's post, let's distill this down.
Romney/Ryan have won the November 2012 election and in January are sworn in. The Republicans have won enough swing states that they now have both a Senate and House majority. In the first 6 weeks, they push through a storm of bills that defund any organization that supports abortion, including PP. Much like DOMA, the Republicans force through a Defense of Children Act and DOCA is the law of the land making abortions illegal. The Republicans have overturned ACA and it no longer requires people to have insurance. A young black woman who works as a waitress in a small diner, making just enough to pay her rent, utilities and food gets pregnant. She finds out that the child has a birth defect that will be costly for medical coverage, but she has no medical insurance coverage because she cannot afford it. She makes just over the poverty level, so is not eligible for Medicaid. Due to complications, she has to take two weeks off to have the baby. She doesn't get paid. She no longer has enough to pay her rent, let alone medical bills.
What is she supposed to do? If she can make it there, she can eat in a soup kitchen, but for the 2 weeks, she's on bedrest so can't take the bus to get to the soup kitchen. And she doesn't have bus fare anyways. But she's not allowed to abort the baby, she is about to be evicted because she cannot pay her rent and she has no means of child support, so even if she could go back to work, she has no one to take care of her child and has to stay home to care for the baby.
Anonymous wrote:Two wrongs don't make a right. Don't kill the child take away govt resources given to illegal immigrants and shower them on children and mothers of rape( after conviction of course).
Anonymous wrote:Two wrongs don't make a right. Don't kill the child take away govt resources given to illegal immigrants and shower them on children and mothers of rape( after conviction of course).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
God dammit, I do NOT believe that the embryo is a human being!!!!! The beliefs of you, Akin, and your Aunt Fanny have NO bearing here! Apply your beliefs to YOUR uterus and its contents, NOT. MINE. And not anyone who is not YOU.
So if I shoot someone because I don't believe they are a human being, does that make it ok?
If a woman drowns her 3 month old because she says they aren't a human being, is that ok?
Why do the beliefs of others matter in those situations but not in the case of abortion?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No it doesn't make me Akin's friend. Rape is HORRIBLE. Unspeakably horrible. But IF you believe that the baby conceived...even in the horror of rape...is a human being, how can you justify ending the life of that baby. The baby didn't commit rape. Ending the baby's life doesn't punish the rapist. I agree that it would be horrible to carry a rapist's baby, and that's something I wouldn't wish on anyone, but the alternative is killing an innocent child.
So you're willing to transform rape from a few horrible minutes/hours into a nine-month living nightmare?
I do not get that. And if it was you or your daughter, I think you'd change your mind in a nanosecond.