This is crazy. As long as they don't turn away homosexuals for service, I admire the chief executive for standing for what he believes in and not being a leaf in the wind like Romney or Bush. And besides, they serve good food. To everybody. And they employ people that will work hard. Including homosexuals, because they need jobs, too. And this isn't even a matter of them pressing their ideology on their customers, just saying that they don't agree with homosexuality. So whatever.

Wow. I couldn't believe you could possibly so incredibly stupid.Yet, you are. Both bigoted and astonishingly stupid. Hard to hit that combo, even if you tried.

Look at what the Family Research Council and Exodus do with the money CFA gives them.

Also, they've had about a dozen employment discrimination suits against them.

This is crazy. As long as they don't turn away homosexuals for service, I admire the chief executive for standing for what he believes in and not being a leaf in the wind like Romney or Bush. And besides, they serve good food. To everybody. And they employ people that will work hard. Including homosexuals, because they need jobs, too. And this isn't even a matter of them pressing their ideology on their customers, just saying that they don't agree with homosexuality. So whatever.

Way to be Christlike, PP.

Go back and read the red words in your bible, it may help with your attitude.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Plenty of states offer equal rights for gays under civil unions. But they are still crying that they want to use the word "marriage" and it's not the same if they can't. So all that bitching and moaning when they ALREADY HAVE their rights but want it called marriage?? Cry me a river.

If gay rights are so utterly beneath your concern, why do you spend so much time and effort blocking them?

Who said I'm blocking them? I just don't consider them married (which is how the majority of Americans feel as well) and I'm tired of the crying.

Yes, but we DO consider ourselves married, and we want the rights that go along with that. So if you care so little, why get in the way? Give us what we want and we'll stop "crying."

Nice attitude. Yet another reason for me to consider you "civilly united." Enjoy your union.

Anonymous wrote:It looks like a lot of consumers are standing their ground against CFA.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/30/chick-fil-a-brand-approval-rating-anti-gay-controversy_n_1719359.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false

Too bad for you, CFA.

But their profits are going to be okay. They stil have lines out the door at every location.

It looks like a lot of consumers are standing their ground against CFA.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/30/chick-fil-a-brand-approval-rating-anti-gay-controversy_n_1719359.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false

Too bad for you, CFA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Plenty of states offer equal rights for gays under civil unions. But they are still crying that they want to use the word "marriage" and it's not the same if they can't. So all that bitching and moaning when they ALREADY HAVE their rights but want it called marriage?? Cry me a river.

If gay rights are so utterly beneath your concern, why do you spend so much time and effort blocking them?

Who said I'm blocking them? I just don't consider them married (which is how the majority of Americans feel as well) and I'm tired of the crying.

Yes, but we DO consider ourselves married, and we want the rights that go along with that. So if you care so little, why get in the way? Give us what we want and we'll stop "crying."

Anonymous wrote:This controversy caused the VP of PR to die:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-chick-fil-a-20120728,0,765557.story

Bet they'll find his arteries were clogged with fat from all that fried food.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Plenty of states offer equal rights for gays under civil unions. But they are still crying that they want to use the word "marriage" and it's not the same if they can't. So all that bitching and moaning when they ALREADY HAVE their rights but want it called marriage?? Cry me a river.

If gay rights are so utterly beneath your concern, why do you spend so much time and effort blocking them?

Who said I'm blocking them? I just don't consider them married (which is how the majority of Americans feel as well) and I'm tired of the crying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Plenty of states offer equal rights for gays under civil unions. But they are still crying that they want to use the word "marriage" and it's not the same if they can't. So all that bitching and moaning when they ALREADY HAVE their rights but want it called marriage?? Cry me a river.

If gay rights are so utterly beneath your concern, why do you spend so much time and effort blocking them?

np: who says pp is? we're having a discussion here, not running a campaign.

Anonymous wrote:Plenty of states offer equal rights for gays under civil unions. But they are still crying that they want to use the word "marriage" and it's not the same if they can't. So all that bitching and moaning when they ALREADY HAVE their rights but want it called marriage?? Cry me a river.

If gay rights are so utterly beneath your concern, why do you spend so much time and effort blocking them?