Anonymous wrote:Bull. How do you know sex with other people is different and unsatisfying if you haven't cheated? You say you crave sex with your husband but are you really saying you don't fantasize about other men? About people you meet? You aren't tempted? I just don't buy it. I mean, you can choose not to cheat but I think it's a cop out to pretend that some one else's penis would be OH SO TERRIBLE and NOT EVEN SEXUALLY SATISFYING based on conjecture. Isn't this the same crap where people pretend that they don't notice other good looking people when they get married? Maybe it would be not amazing but better than nothing. What about some flirting or online sex? You have to rationalize that you don't want other men so that you don't really have to consider infidelity.
I think I'm just reacting against the passivity in the posts. People have lots of options but choose not to exercise them. You choose not to force your partner to counseling, you choose not to threaten divorce (not even for leverage, cos you don't want to "hurt anyone"), you choose not to cheat, you choose to stay married, you choose not to indulge in a bit of harmless online flirtation/web sex. But then it's like woe is me! I have NO OPTIONS. I stay for the KIDS. You have plenty but you choose not to exercise any of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I think one of the posters nailed it. I think that there is very timid poor communication here on both sides. The rejected partner does not want to "hurt" anyone so never really makes their spouse listen. I admire the pp who made a list and said divorce or else. I think people who refuse to ever put divorce on the table are martyrs. Because unless you KNOW you would never divorce, even if infidelity, then you are just sitting around being a martyr victim, giving up all your power. Not saying throw it up in every argument, just that you've thought about it.
Or just cheat. Really, what's the big deal?
I've been on dcum for a few years and I have to say, with this + dan savage, I definitely don't consider infidelity anything like a dealbreaker. If I had a low drive spouse, I would accept it and cheat. Definitely.
I am one of the posters who are in a sexless marriage, and I'm a DW. While it bugs the hell out of me to live a life of involuntary celibacy, I would never divorce "because" of this, assuming everything else is satisfactory, because we have children. What do I tell my son? Mommy broke the family because she couldn't get her rocks off with Daddy? seriously? I don't say I'd NEVER divorce, but I wouldn't make my sexual satisfaction a priority over my child's need for a complete family. I realize you may feel differently, but this is how my mental calculus worked this out.
The big deal with cheating is that it's not exactly satisfying. I'm not sitting around craving an orgasm from a random person. I want to have mad sex with my husband, the man I married. Sex I can have with other people, while it can be good, is just not the same commodity.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I think one of the posters nailed it. I think that there is very timid poor communication here on both sides. The rejected partner does not want to "hurt" anyone so never really makes their spouse listen. I admire the pp who made a list and said divorce or else. I think people who refuse to ever put divorce on the table are martyrs. Because unless you KNOW you would never divorce, even if infidelity, then you are just sitting around being a martyr victim, giving up all your power. Not saying throw it up in every argument, just that you've thought about it.
Or just cheat. Really, what's the big deal?
I've been on dcum for a few years and I have to say, with this + dan savage, I definitely don't consider infidelity anything like a dealbreaker. If I had a low drive spouse, I would accept it and cheat. Definitely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH does not see himself that way. He always attributes the low freq to various stresses or situations that change. But he is the constant. A therapist told me that I may need to accept that DH is low desire in order to stay in the marriage. I do.
If you were to tell him flat-out (or if you have already said this) "I need more sex and affection to be happy in a marriage and I feel like I have tried everything I can think of to help you have more desire for sex. At this point, I am accepting that you are giving me the most you can. I cannot continue in a marriage at this level of sexual activity. Please help me decide what to do next.". What would he say?
Full medical checkup -- no problems. Like PP's DH mine will not accommodate me in any alternative fashion. I could never say that I cannot continue in our marriage because I must and will. I can't even imagine how hurt he would be if I intimated that I were thinking of divorce. I know it works for many people but it's not an option for me unless there is an affair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH does not see himself that way. He always attributes the low freq to various stresses or situations that change. But he is the constant. A therapist told me that I may need to accept that DH is low desire in order to stay in the marriage. I do.
If you were to tell him flat-out (or if you have already said this) "I need more sex and affection to be happy in a marriage and I feel like I have tried everything I can think of to help you have more desire for sex. At this point, I am accepting that you are giving me the most you can. I cannot continue in a marriage at this level of sexual activity. Please help me decide what to do next.". What would he say?