Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getting back to IMPACT, this teacher was a Group 1 teacher, meaning a teacher whose IMPACT score is weighted 55% according to test scores.
Here is some recent data on the percentage of "so-called" highly effective educators according to group. Note that only 4% of Group 1 teachers were rated highly effective last year. What does this tell you about the validity of this evaluation instrument?
Group % Highly Effective Teachers in Group
1 4
2 16
3 11
3a 41
4 18
5 64
6 0
very interesting. how did you find this out?
I asked a staff member at our school who was soliciting feedback from teachers about IMPACT on behalf of DCPS.
This should have been included in the NY Times article about DCPS bonuses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getting back to IMPACT, this teacher was a Group 1 teacher, meaning a teacher whose IMPACT score is weighted 55% according to test scores.
Here is some recent data on the percentage of "so-called" highly effective educators according to group. Note that only 4% of Group 1 teachers were rated highly effective last year. What does this tell you about the validity of this evaluation instrument?
Group % Highly Effective Teachers in Group
1 4
2 16
3 11
3a 41
4 18
5 64
6 0
very interesting. how did you find this out?
I asked a staff member at our school who was soliciting feedback from teachers about IMPACT on behalf of DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getting back to IMPACT, this teacher was a Group 1 teacher, meaning a teacher whose IMPACT score is weighted 55% according to test scores.
Here is some recent data on the percentage of "so-called" highly effective educators according to group. Note that only 4% of Group 1 teachers were rated highly effective last year. What does this tell you about the validity of this evaluation instrument?
Group % Highly Effective Teachers in Group
1 4
2 16
3 11
3a 41
4 18
5 64
6 0
This should have been included in the NY Times article about DCPS bonuses.
very interesting. how did you find this out?
I asked a staff member at our school who was soliciting feedback from teachers about IMPACT on behalf of DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getting back to IMPACT, this teacher was a Group 1 teacher, meaning a teacher whose IMPACT score is weighted 55% according to test scores.
Here is some recent data on the percentage of "so-called" highly effective educators according to group. Note that only 4% of Group 1 teachers were rated highly effective last year. What does this tell you about the validity of this evaluation instrument?
Group % Highly Effective Teachers in Group
1 4
2 16
3 11
3a 41
4 18
5 64
6 0
very interesting. how did you find this out?
Anonymous wrote:this is why 2nd graders will take standard test in 2011-12, so that their 3rd grade teacher can be "group 1"
Anonymous wrote:Apparently the itinerant ELL teachers are some of the best teachers we've got. And those Group 1 teachers are chopped liver.
Not!
Anonymous wrote:Getting back to IMPACT, this teacher was a Group 1 teacher, meaning a teacher whose IMPACT score is weighted 55% according to test scores.
Here is some recent data on the percentage of "so-called" highly effective educators according to group. Note that only 4% of Group 1 teachers were rated highly effective last year. What does this tell you about the validity of this evaluation instrument?
Group % Highly Effective Teachers in Group
1 4
2 16
3 11
3a 41
4 18
5 64
6 0