Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugg and Northface products are 'nice things'?I beg to differ. They're ugly as a deadly sin.
I found this funny too. If she things Uggs and Northface are "nice" maybe she needs a fashion lesson.
I don't know a teen who doesn't wear Ugg and Northface.
Neither of my teens have any Ugg or Northface stuff.
Do you homeschool?
Anonymous wrote:
How do you possibly derive "entitled" from what you quoted here? Because you were poor and she was middle class?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have money, it's just really hard. Outside of special occasions (birthday, Christmas), we don't buy dc toys. He gets a small allowance, which is slightly increased if he does certain chores. He is allowed to spend half, but he has to save half (we pay him interest on the half he saves). We have successfully (albeit unintentionally) convinced him that we're poor. He is not "entitled" in the way most people use the word (when our house was on the market, he asked me if, when we sold the house, he could buy a pack of Pokemon cards). Tonight, he announced that he wants to get a job (he's nine).
However, and this is a big however, we live in a very nice, but not huge, house in an expensive neighborhood. The kids dc hangs out with on a day to day basis are exactly like him. Nice kids with nice (and well to do) parents. I knew we had some work to do when he came home from an outing with a friend and announced that we needed to join the country club because "everything there is free!". It's very easy to raise a kid that is not "entitled" who still has no understanding of the reality of the "99 percent." it's possible to show them, but it takes work when everyone they know well is just like them.
I know someone will now announce that this is why they send their kids to public school. But really, how many people on this board send their kids to a school with real economic diversity, and if you do, how many of you regularly take your child to play dates to the houses of friends who are substantially poorer than yourself? (and I'm not talking "lives in a condo in NW" "poor.")
Oh, I'm sure the starving people of Darfur weep for your troubles.
I weep for your lack of ability to comprehend what you read.
To spell it out for you--
Question: how do you raise kids that are not entitled?
Answer: if you have money, it's hard to raise kids that are not entitled.
Next question: how do you raise kids that are not sanctimonious bitches?
Anonymous wrote:Ugg and Northface products are 'nice things'?I beg to differ. They're ugly as a deadly sin.
I found this funny too. If she things Uggs and Northface are "nice" maybe she needs a fashion lesson.
I don't know a teen who doesn't wear Ugg and Northface.
Neither of my teens have any Ugg or Northface stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have money, it's just really hard. Outside of special occasions (birthday, Christmas), we don't buy dc toys. He gets a small allowance, which is slightly increased if he does certain chores. He is allowed to spend half, but he has to save half (we pay him interest on the half he saves). We have successfully (albeit unintentionally) convinced him that we're poor. He is not "entitled" in the way most people use the word (when our house was on the market, he asked me if, when we sold the house, he could buy a pack of Pokemon cards). Tonight, he announced that he wants to get a job (he's nine).
However, and this is a big however, we live in a very nice, but not huge, house in an expensive neighborhood. The kids dc hangs out with on a day to day basis are exactly like him. Nice kids with nice (and well to do) parents. I knew we had some work to do when he came home from an outing with a friend and announced that we needed to join the country club because "everything there is free!". It's very easy to raise a kid that is not "entitled" who still has no understanding of the reality of the "99 percent." it's possible to show them, but it takes work when everyone they know well is just like them.
I know someone will now announce that this is why they send their kids to public school. But really, how many people on this board send their kids to a school with real economic diversity, and if you do, how many of you regularly take your child to play dates to the houses of friends who are substantially poorer than yourself? (and I'm not talking "lives in a condo in NW" "poor.")
Oh, I'm sure the starving people of Darfur weep for your troubles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp: I don't think having a mean stepmom is going to help your stepson be any kinder of a person. If your disdain for him can come through so clearly in a couple paragraphs imagine how obvious it is to him.
It is not disdain for him, it is disdain for that behavior. No different than when you get mad at your child for having a temper tantrum or being rude. You don't dislike them, you dislike the behavior.
Please. Your post OOZES "evil stepmother" vibe. Sure, the kid may be horrible. But if he were your kid, you'd see it as just one flaw in a kid you otherwise love, and you would not declare him a bad kid in general. But no, the tone of your post makes clear that you don't really like him. This is such a common dynamic with stepmothers -- exaggerate characteristics of the stepkids so that they become "horrible kids" in general. I don't blame you for this tendancy because being a stepmother is really freakin' hard, and I believe that it is an inherently difficult relationship to manage. In a lot of cases I think there's just an instinctual dislike to the stepkids that's probably biologically based. However, you're the adult, and it is your job to overcome this and provide a loving home.
You have a very limited ability to process information or other people's perspectives. Nothing in her post would lead one to take what you did from it.
Hmm, let's see, the fact that she compares her step unfavorably to her own kid; the fact that she even saw fit to be posting about her step on the internet anyway ... all suggests to me that she holds him to much higher standards than her own kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not all about "things." We have the money to buy things so we buy nice things. Therefore, the kids' (teens) things are all nice: Ugg, Northface, Starbucks, Tiffany, etc, nice vacations, nice cars, all Apple everything etc, etc. If the kids are nice and compassionate and thankful, then having all nice things does not make them entitled. I think it may mean just that their parents have plenty of money.
Ugg and Northface products are 'nice things'?I beg to differ. They're ugly as a deadly sin.
I found this funny too. If she things Uggs and Northface are "nice" maybe she needs a fashion lesson.
I don't know a teen who doesn't wear Ugg and Northface.
Neither of my teens have any Ugg or Northface stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp: I don't think having a mean stepmom is going to help your stepson be any kinder of a person. If your disdain for him can come through so clearly in a couple paragraphs imagine how obvious it is to him.
It is not disdain for him, it is disdain for that behavior. No different than when you get mad at your child for having a temper tantrum or being rude. You don't dislike them, you dislike the behavior.
Please. Your post OOZES "evil stepmother" vibe. Sure, the kid may be horrible. But if he were your kid, you'd see it as just one flaw in a kid you otherwise love, and you would not declare him a bad kid in general. But no, the tone of your post makes clear that you don't really like him. This is such a common dynamic with stepmothers -- exaggerate characteristics of the stepkids so that they become "horrible kids" in general. I don't blame you for this tendancy because being a stepmother is really freakin' hard, and I believe that it is an inherently difficult relationship to manage. In a lot of cases I think there's just an instinctual dislike to the stepkids that's probably biologically based. However, you're the adult, and it is your job to overcome this and provide a loving home.
You have a very limited ability to process information or other people's perspectives. Nothing in her post would lead one to take what you did from it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not all about "things." We have the money to buy things so we buy nice things. Therefore, the kids' (teens) things are all nice: Ugg, Northface, Starbucks, Tiffany, etc, nice vacations, nice cars, all Apple everything etc, etc. If the kids are nice and compassionate and thankful, then having all nice things does not make them entitled. I think it may mean just that their parents have plenty of money.
Ugg and Northface products are 'nice things'?I beg to differ. They're ugly as a deadly sin.
I found this funny too. If she things Uggs and Northface are "nice" maybe she needs a fashion lesson.
I don't know a teen who doesn't wear Ugg and Northface.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp: I don't think having a mean stepmom is going to help your stepson be any kinder of a person. If your disdain for him can come through so clearly in a couple paragraphs imagine how obvious it is to him.
It is not disdain for him, it is disdain for that behavior. No different than when you get mad at your child for having a temper tantrum or being rude. You don't dislike them, you dislike the behavior.
Please. Your post OOZES "evil stepmother" vibe. Sure, the kid may be horrible. But if he were your kid, you'd see it as just one flaw in a kid you otherwise love, and you would not declare him a bad kid in general. But no, the tone of your post makes clear that you don't really like him. This is such a common dynamic with stepmothers -- exaggerate characteristics of the stepkids so that they become "horrible kids" in general. I don't blame you for this tendancy because being a stepmother is really freakin' hard, and I believe that it is an inherently difficult relationship to manage. In a lot of cases I think there's just an instinctual dislike to the stepkids that's probably biologically based. However, you're the adult, and it is your job to overcome this and provide a loving home.
You have a very limited ability to process information or other people's perspectives. Nothing in her post would lead one to take what you did from it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not all about "things." We have the money to buy things so we buy nice things. Therefore, the kids' (teens) things are all nice: Ugg, Northface, Starbucks, Tiffany, etc, nice vacations, nice cars, all Apple everything etc, etc. If the kids are nice and compassionate and thankful, then having all nice things does not make them entitled. I think it may mean just that their parents have plenty of money.
Ugg and Northface products are 'nice things'?I beg to differ. They're ugly as a deadly sin.
I found this funny too. If she things Uggs and Northface are "nice" maybe she needs a fashion lesson.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp: I don't think having a mean stepmom is going to help your stepson be any kinder of a person. If your disdain for him can come through so clearly in a couple paragraphs imagine how obvious it is to him.
It is not disdain for him, it is disdain for that behavior. No different than when you get mad at your child for having a temper tantrum or being rude. You don't dislike them, you dislike the behavior.
Please. Your post OOZES "evil stepmother" vibe. Sure, the kid may be horrible. But if he were your kid, you'd see it as just one flaw in a kid you otherwise love, and you would not declare him a bad kid in general. But no, the tone of your post makes clear that you don't really like him. This is such a common dynamic with stepmothers -- exaggerate characteristics of the stepkids so that they become "horrible kids" in general. I don't blame you for this tendancy because being a stepmother is really freakin' hard, and I believe that it is an inherently difficult relationship to manage. In a lot of cases I think there's just an instinctual dislike to the stepkids that's probably biologically based. However, you're the adult, and it is your job to overcome this and provide a loving home.
Anonymous wrote:If you have money, it's just really hard. Outside of special occasions (birthday, Christmas), we don't buy dc toys. He gets a small allowance, which is slightly increased if he does certain chores. He is allowed to spend half, but he has to save half (we pay him interest on the half he saves). We have successfully (albeit unintentionally) convinced him that we're poor. He is not "entitled" in the way most people use the word (when our house was on the market, he asked me if, when we sold the house, he could buy a pack of Pokemon cards). Tonight, he announced that he wants to get a job (he's nine).
However, and this is a big however, we live in a very nice, but not huge, house in an expensive neighborhood. The kids dc hangs out with on a day to day basis are exactly like him. Nice kids with nice (and well to do) parents. I knew we had some work to do when he came home from an outing with a friend and announced that we needed to join the country club because "everything there is free!". It's very easy to raise a kid that is not "entitled" who still has no understanding of the reality of the "99 percent." it's possible to show them, but it takes work when everyone they know well is just like them.
I know someone will now announce that this is why they send their kids to public school. But really, how many people on this board send their kids to a school with real economic diversity, and if you do, how many of you regularly take your child to play dates to the houses of friends who are substantially poorer than yourself? (and I'm not talking "lives in a condo in NW" "poor.")
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not all about "things." We have the money to buy things so we buy nice things. Therefore, the kids' (teens) things are all nice: Ugg, Northface, Starbucks, Tiffany, etc, nice vacations, nice cars, all Apple everything etc, etc. If the kids are nice and compassionate and thankful, then having all nice things does not make them entitled. I think it may mean just that their parents have plenty of money.
Ugg and Northface products are 'nice things'?I beg to differ. They're ugly as a deadly sin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp: I don't think having a mean stepmom is going to help your stepson be any kinder of a person. If your disdain for him can come through so clearly in a couple paragraphs imagine how obvious it is to him.
It is not disdain for him, it is disdain for that behavior. No different than when you get mad at your child for having a temper tantrum or being rude. You don't dislike them, you dislike the behavior.
Please. Your post OOZES "evil stepmother" vibe. Sure, the kid may be horrible. But if he were your kid, you'd see it as just one flaw in a kid you otherwise love, and you would not declare him a bad kid in general. But no, the tone of your post makes clear that you don't really like him. This is such a common dynamic with stepmothers -- exaggerate characteristics of the stepkids so that they become "horrible kids" in general. I don't blame you for this tendancy because being a stepmother is really freakin' hard, and I believe that it is an inherently difficult relationship to manage. In a lot of cases I think there's just an instinctual dislike to the stepkids that's probably biologically based. However, you're the adult, and it is your job to overcome this and provide a loving home.