Anonymous wrote:This simplifies the issue quite dramatically, but ok. Also, there is no vast choice of middle schools for Brent graduates. There are no decent choices. Therein lies the problem and the angst. No one wants to go charter or move away but t he alternatives roads are not being built.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these two vocal Brent parents in positions of parent leadership? I don't get why they're having such an outsize influence. You would think Brent would be electing parents to leadership positions that reflect the views of the majority of parents.
Have you paid any attention to . . .let's say the republican primary? Being in a leadership position, especially in a bad situation is not much fun, and doesn't necessarily appeal to everyone. I often find myself quietly disagreeing with "vocal parents" but when I'm honest with myself and ask-- what's my vision? do I want to go to all those boring meetings trying to talk about it? no, that would take too much time away from anon posting on dcum.
Anonymous wrote:Are these two vocal Brent parents in positions of parent leadership? I don't get why they're having such an outsize influence. You would think Brent would be electing parents to leadership positions that reflect the views of the majority of parents.
Anonymous wrote:The suggestion of having Brent and Maury feed into SH was put forth at a meeting I attended with Brent parents about five years ago. The Brent parents at that time rejected that idea outright, as they wanted DCPS to get Jefferson's Academy going for them to feed into. I don't know any "Clusters crazies" who would not be thrilled to have SH be a destination school for Brent and Maury.
Regarding OOB numbers, while SH may have a lot of OOB, they are from a lot of families within the next boundary over. But there are pockets of high OOB numbers at the most popular middle schools, Hardy being probably the most with OOB, and their renovation cost $45 million.
If you also look at the numbers for renovation dollars, Eliot-Hine is scheduled to get a significant reno in 2013-2014 ($38m, I think). All of the money is already in the budget and committed to all of these schools, so it's not that one school will get money and the others get that amount subtracted. And if that were to happen, why wouldn't we all rise up against that being allowed anyway? Why can Ward 2/3 get many hundreds of millions to renovate two middle schools and a high school, while Ward 6 has to fight and scrape to renovate our two middles into schools that the 1000+ students in the upcoming middle school bubble on the hill could fill? The population numbers are such that we could support all of these schools, just like in NW.
I like the idea that SH could be a Hardy model, smaller middle school, EH can become the larger Deal type model and both schools feed Eastern to make it the Wilson of Ward 6-a comprehensive, strong high school with lots of course offerings and tons of extracurriculars. But with all this bickering and pitting people against each other and people suggesting that SH just be combined with EH, I fear that may never happen...
Anonymous wrote:To now pull strings for some select Capitol Hill schools to feed into Stuart-Hobson is just ludicrous. Why these schools, not those, why there, why now, why this?
I can't take people who change their mind as often as the wind changes direction seriously any longer, smart as they may be, and frankly neither should those higher up. One can't turn every personal whim into a policy. What's needed instead is a serious effort, at all levels, to follow through with the Word 6 middle school plan.
Anonymous wrote:I can't figure out why on earth the Brent community lets that one particularly vocal parent speak on their behalf. Instead of pushing to close Stuart-Hobson, why aren't Brent parents making a serious effort to change their feeder pattern there based on the vertical alignment of their museum magnet programs? Makes total sense and the Cluster would welcome it. Why not organize around that goal instead of letting him burning bridges with people who should/could be their allies?
Anonymous wrote:I can't figure out why on earth the Brent community lets that one particularly vocal parent speak on their behalf. Instead of pushing to close Stuart-Hobson, why aren't Brent parents making a serious effort to change their feeder pattern there based on the vertical alignment of their museum magnet programs? Makes total sense and the Cluster would welcome it. Why not organize around that goal instead of letting him burning bridges with people who should/could be their allies?