Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"So is it the worst offense against the full meaning of love when husbands and wives exchange intimate pictures, even film? Is it destructive when they come apart from each other, if it is because they are longing for each other? No, definitely not. But it is a compromise of the ideal, and so risks undermining the strength of their love for each other, even as it gratifies legitimate human needs and desires."

Does this mean no more dirty e-mails between DH and me? No more "dirty girl" talk in bed? 'Cause we'd be risking underminding the strength of our love for each other? After 28 years?

Definitely. You don't want to sex to be too hot or you might undermine the love. That would totally suck. Plus God probably wouldn't like it if the sex was too good in your marriage.

Thinking about God peeking into our bedroom is a huge turn off, maybe that's Church Lady's intentions. Thanks for ruining our three day weekend.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"So is it the worst offense against the full meaning of love when husbands and wives exchange intimate pictures, even film? Is it destructive when they come apart from each other, if it is because they are longing for each other? No, definitely not. But it is a compromise of the ideal, and so risks undermining the strength of their love for each other, even as it gratifies legitimate human needs and desires."

Does this mean no more dirty e-mails between DH and me? No more "dirty girl" talk in bed? 'Cause we'd be risking underminding the strength of our love for each other? After 28 years?

Definitely. You don't want to sex to be too hot or you might undermine the love. That would totally suck. Plus God probably wouldn't like it if the sex was too good in your marriage.