Anonymous wrote:Yes you never speed, it's the cameras fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:those of you who are naive or stupid enough to say quaint things like "don't speed = no ticket" are utterly clueless about the vagaries of radar, calibration, etc.
Ever see the test in which radar clocked a stationary tree going faster than the speed limit?
I didn't think so ....
Oh please, that was decades ago and the speed cameras are operating from a fixed position aimed down at one spot on the road. You are dreaming if you think those speed cameras are catching a tree blowing in the wind.
the physics principles etc. behind those false readings are just as applicable today, IIRC those readings were also fixed readings, not moving.
the point is that the technology is still highly susceptible to error, first; and second, these cameras are pure income generators and do nothing to get bad drivers off the road at the time of the violation (since no one is stopped), nor will they result in license supensions.
they're simply disguised tax collectors ...
No they aren't, and there are so many reasons you are wrong.
#1 a fixed position camera can be aimed so that it does not have trees waving in its field of vision. The setup is much more reliable than a cop aiming a gun at the top of a hill from the window of his car.
#2 radar's reliability decreases with distance, but these speed cameras in urban areas are a few hundred feet away, not 1/2 mile off.
#3 The technology they are using is usually Ka band with photo. The photo camera is aimed at a fixed position, and the detector is aimed at exactly the same spot. Sometimes there are even road sensors.
#4 They keep maintenance logs and to mount a defense you would have to subpoena the logs and find fault with them, or else you will find it hard to argue for inaccuracy.
This is why the only defense with some chance of success is that the picture is too blurry to identify you, and gosh you don't know who was driving your car that day. You can throw a hail mary and tell them it was raining, but they are going to ignore that.
If you don't believe me, google photo radar defense. The suggestions for defense are laughable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:those of you who are naive or stupid enough to say quaint things like "don't speed = no ticket" are utterly clueless about the vagaries of radar, calibration, etc.
Ever see the test in which radar clocked a stationary tree going faster than the speed limit?
I didn't think so ....
Oh please, that was decades ago and the speed cameras are operating from a fixed position aimed down at one spot on the road. You are dreaming if you think those speed cameras are catching a tree blowing in the wind.
the physics principles etc. behind those false readings are just as applicable today, IIRC those readings were also fixed readings, not moving.
the point is that the technology is still highly susceptible to error, first; and second, these cameras are pure income generators and do nothing to get bad drivers off the road at the time of the violation (since no one is stopped), nor will they result in license supensions.
they're simply disguised tax collectors ...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:those of you who are naive or stupid enough to say quaint things like "don't speed = no ticket" are utterly clueless about the vagaries of radar, calibration, etc.
Ever see the test in which radar clocked a stationary tree going faster than the speed limit?
I didn't think so ....
Oh please, that was decades ago and the speed cameras are operating from a fixed position aimed down at one spot on the road. You are dreaming if you think those speed cameras are catching a tree blowing in the wind.
Anonymous wrote:Here is someone who did. http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2009/09/dc-camera-ticket-overturned-over-accuracy-doubts/
There is something else that is kind of interesting. Your ticket, this ticket that was overturned, the two tickets I just got are EXACTLY for 11 mph over the speed limit. In both of my camera tickets I just got there are other vehicles in the picture. So I plan to fight them and point to this ruling as the reason the tickets I received are invalid.
+1Anonymous wrote:You are a speeder. Stop it now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I personally think the city and these speed cameras are getting a little out of hand. There's a total of 5 speed cameras on 295n starting from when you enter dc from the Woodrow Wilson Bridge to before you enter the bw parkway smh. The speed limit goes from 45 to 50 back to 45 and that's just terrible. The first 2 cameras entering dc from va aren't even 50yds apart and I find that such a set up. I'm not condoning speeding but I think its ridiculous to have 5 cameras on such a short interstate. The one by the BENNING ROAD exactly on 295 is hidden and u can't see it and the flash doesn't work. It's on the left when they're normally on the right and its backed up to the wall between the guardrails smh. I've travelled 295 everyday and never received a speeding ticket not once now they put a hidden camera and now here comes a 125.00 ticket for supposedly doing 11 miles over the speed limit and might I add my bf was in the fast lane and I was in the truck with him and he doesn't speed because he knows I'll slap his face if he do. The District of Columbia is full of shit. I want to fight it because the law says all cameras should be seen not hidden.
This is fascinating. Could you please cite the relevant DC code that "says all cameras should be seen not hidden? That would be super-duper helpful!
Yes, it is such a setup 50 yards apart. It's so unfair that they give you no time to speed in between cameras. PLUS they hide the damn things, so you might have to drive the speed limit all of the time.
The kicker is that you are SO WORRIED about speed cameras even though your bf DOES NOT SPEED because he will get his face slapped. I hate to use the eyeroll, but seriously there is no other response.and one for your bf for putting up with that shit
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I personally think the city and these speed cameras are getting a little out of hand. There's a total of 5 speed cameras on 295n starting from when you enter dc from the Woodrow Wilson Bridge to before you enter the bw parkway smh. The speed limit goes from 45 to 50 back to 45 and that's just terrible. The first 2 cameras entering dc from va aren't even 50yds apart and I find that such a set up. I'm not condoning speeding but I think its ridiculous to have 5 cameras on such a short interstate. The one by the BENNING ROAD exactly on 295 is hidden and u can't see it and the flash doesn't work. It's on the left when they're normally on the right and its backed up to the wall between the guardrails smh. I've travelled 295 everyday and never received a speeding ticket not once now they put a hidden camera and now here comes a 125.00 ticket for supposedly doing 11 miles over the speed limit and might I add my bf was in the fast lane and I was in the truck with him and he doesn't speed because he knows I'll slap his face if he do. The District of Columbia is full of shit. I want to fight it because the law says all cameras should be seen not hidden.
This is fascinating. Could you please cite the relevant DC code that "says all cameras should be seen not hidden? That would be super-duper helpful!
Yes, it is such a setup 50 yards apart. It's so unfair that they give you no time to speed in between cameras. PLUS they hide the damn things, so you might have to drive the speed limit all of the time.
The kicker is that you are SO WORRIED about speed cameras even though your bf DOES NOT SPEED because he will get his face slapped. I hate to use the eyeroll, but seriously there is no other response.and one for your bf for putting up with that shit
![]()