Anonymous wrote:My concern is the Board discussion to mandate multiple period closed lunches. My kid is at Blair and enjoys the hour long lunch period - everyone has the same lunch period. They run clubs during lunch, students meet with teachers for academic support, watch movies in the theatre, play sports in the gyms, go the weight room, etc., and if not in a club or meeting with a teacher, the kids get to chill with friends for an hour. Since everyone has the same lunch period - they get to see all their friends. The students eat in the cafeteria, outside, in teacher's classrooms, and in the hallway table areas. If a multi-period lunch gets mandated, gone are the lunch clubs, the kids won't be able to hang in teacher's classrooms or eat in multiple places, and academic support will be more limited. Hopefully that was just a passing thought and not something that will actually be implemented.
Anonymous wrote:My concern is the Board discussion to mandate multiple period closed lunches. My kid is at Blair and enjoys the hour long lunch period - everyone has the same lunch period. They run clubs during lunch, students meet with teachers for academic support, watch movies in the theatre, play sports in the gyms, go the weight room, etc., and if not in a club or meeting with a teacher, the kids get to chill with friends for an hour. Since everyone has the same lunch period - they get to see all their friends. The students eat in the cafeteria, outside, in teacher's classrooms, and in the hallway table areas. If a multi-period lunch gets mandated, gone are the lunch clubs, the kids won't be able to hang in teacher's classrooms or eat in multiple places, and academic support will be more limited. Hopefully that was just a passing thought and not something that will actually be implemented.
Anonymous wrote:I guess the BOE views this as an equity issue? They aren’t going to allow anything unique, special or different at any of the schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guessing that Woodward won’t have open lunch so they see this as an opportunity to end it.
Not everything is strictly about the w schools. It’s a safety and liability issue. How much are your kids spending? Eating out daily is $$
Open lunch does not mean eating out. My WJ kids pack their lunches but eat in random locations near school.
Yes. There's nothing wrong with a healthy stroll away from campus, or to get some fresh air and vitamin d (from the sun). Some schools in rival districts keep the hs kids cooped up inside the building all day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guessing that Woodward won’t have open lunch so they see this as an opportunity to end it.
Not everything is strictly about the w schools. It’s a safety and liability issue. How much are your kids spending? Eating out daily is $$
Open lunch does not mean eating out. My WJ kids pack their lunches but eat in random locations near school.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think my RM kid every bought lunch but enjoyed going for a walk..getting a break from the building.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guessing that Woodward won’t have open lunch so they see this as an opportunity to end it.
Not everything is strictly about the w schools. It’s a safety and liability issue. How much are your kids spending? Eating out daily is $$
My kids bought lunch once a week over at G Square and packed their lunch the other days. Slice of pizza at Flippin isn’t that much.
Or they just bought something at Giant.
<$10
That's $50 a week, $200 a month, so yes, its expensive.
Anonymous wrote:The Whitman HS kid arrested today is going to fuel this discussion even more now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't even understand this discussion.
Many high schools do not have the space for students' lunches, for in terms of physical space and food availability. Like, it's not even debatable.
It's not happening, people. Open lunch is here to stay.
They started building HSs with small cafeteria years ago. But, they can keep students on campus, somehow. And if Taylor wants it, well then it will be done.
Taylor enjoyed open campus as a B-CC student, probably going to the "B-CC McDonalds", and likely his kids as well. This anti-open campus position is out of the blue. All very strange.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guessing that Woodward won’t have open lunch so they see this as an opportunity to end it.
Not everything is strictly about the w schools. It’s a safety and liability issue. How much are your kids spending? Eating out daily is $$