Anonymous wrote:My sophomore has a showcase this summer and MIT coaches will be there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MIT, the fairest, middle classes friendly and true merit based school. Good luck to everyone.
Esp if you're a female or athlete!
-100
Mit athletes get no admissions boost whatsoever from
Coaches. Yeah, admissions gets a notice who the coach supports but 2/3 of those kids still won’t get in. The 1/3 that do are because they are qualified. No one unqualified is getting into MIT no matter what your athletic abilities are.
It's not a huge boost, but it's a tip and with so many ultraqualified applicants, that tip can determine who gets in.
No one gets in unless qualified. No one. Coaches know ther hands are tied and tell athletes that: no guarantees, no true prereads, no commitments, and if you want to get security, we understand but go elsewhere. They also tell students they will want a 1580 sat with a minimum 790 in math.
100% incorrect. My kid is a recruited athlete at MIT, why do you keep posting stuff that you have no clue about?
Recruited? Or
Admitted? This info is directly from a long time coach there who recruited my kid (kid stopped interacting after understanding there was no guarantee). Teammate committed to swim at JHU when the same thing was told to her. Bird in the hand. So this came from swim
Coaches at mit. Who told you differently -
Identify the MIT coaches.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My understanding is that MIT does not do prereads for athletes. The coaches try to help shape the applications though based on what they’ve seen/know.
For example, DC was initially told he needed to take Calc BC by junior year, which he did is sophomore year. Also needed to take AP Physics C course. If your school didn’t offer, need to go outside of HS to take.
From what I know and what people are saying here, it's obvious that it's different for every sport.
Anonymous wrote:My understanding is that MIT does not do prereads for athletes. The coaches try to help shape the applications though based on what they’ve seen/know.
For example, DC was initially told he needed to take Calc BC by junior year, which he did is sophomore year. Also needed to take AP Physics C course. If your school didn’t offer, need to go outside of HS to take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My understanding is that MIT does not do prereads for athletes. The coaches try to help shape the applications though based on what they’ve seen/know.
For example, DC was initially told he needed to take Calc BC by junior year, which he did is sophomore year. Also needed to take AP Physics C course. If your school didn’t offer, need to go outside of HS to take.
okay, my kid (above, admitted, graduated) didn't take anything outside of our local high school which topped out at Calc and Physics in senior year. she did say her math prep was worse than a lot of her peers and she had zero coding, which she felt was unusual her freshman year but now as a recent grad says would have been a total waste of time.
anyway, if a coach told you all that, clearly the different coaches are giving very different information to kids. was your kid an all-state athlete?
Anonymous wrote:My understanding is that MIT does not do prereads for athletes. The coaches try to help shape the applications though based on what they’ve seen/know.
For example, DC was initially told he needed to take Calc BC by junior year, which he did is sophomore year. Also needed to take AP Physics C course. If your school didn’t offer, need to go outside of HS to take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MIT, the fairest, middle classes friendly and true merit based school. Good luck to everyone.
Esp if you're a female or athlete!
-100
Mit athletes get no admissions boost whatsoever from
Coaches. Yeah, admissions gets a notice who the coach supports but 2/3 of those kids still won’t get in. The 1/3 that do are because they are qualified. No one unqualified is getting into MIT no matter what your athletic abilities are.
It's not a huge boost, but it's a tip and with so many ultraqualified applicants, that tip can determine who gets in.
No one gets in unless qualified. No one. Coaches know ther hands are tied and tell athletes that: no guarantees, no true prereads, no commitments, and if you want to get security, we understand but go elsewhere. They also tell students they will want a 1580 sat with a minimum 790 in math.
100% incorrect. My kid is a recruited athlete at MIT, why do you keep posting stuff that you have no clue about?
Recruited? Or
Admitted? This info is directly from a long time coach there who recruited my kid (kid stopped interacting after understanding there was no guarantee). Teammate committed to swim at JHU when the same thing was told to her. Bird in the hand. So this came from swim
Coaches at mit. Who told you differently -
Identify the MIT coaches.
women's soccer.
its not a bird in hand. it wasn't during early round. if you wanted a bird in hand you had to go elsewhere. (although "committed to the process" is always the language). but it was a large boost.
anyway, my dd graduated already. but the soccer coach is still there and I'm familiar.
Your dd graduated from where?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MIT, the fairest, middle classes friendly and true merit based school. Good luck to everyone.
Esp if you're a female or athlete!
-100
Mit athletes get no admissions boost whatsoever from
Coaches. Yeah, admissions gets a notice who the coach supports but 2/3 of those kids still won’t get in. The 1/3 that do are because they are qualified. No one unqualified is getting into MIT no matter what your athletic abilities are.
It's not a huge boost, but it's a tip and with so many ultraqualified applicants, that tip can determine who gets in.
No one gets in unless qualified. No one. Coaches know ther hands are tied and tell athletes that: no guarantees, no true prereads, no commitments, and if you want to get security, we understand but go elsewhere. They also tell students they will want a 1580 sat with a minimum 790 in math.
100% incorrect. My kid is a recruited athlete at MIT, why do you keep posting stuff that you have no clue about?
Recruited? Or
Admitted? This info is directly from a long time coach there who recruited my kid (kid stopped interacting after understanding there was no guarantee). Teammate committed to swim at JHU when the same thing was told to her. Bird in the hand. So this came from swim
Coaches at mit. Who told you differently -
Identify the MIT coaches.
women's soccer.
its not a bird in hand. it wasn't during early round. if you wanted a bird in hand you had to go elsewhere. (although "committed to the process" is always the language). but it was a large boost.
anyway, my dd graduated already. but the soccer coach is still there and I'm familiar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MIT, the fairest, middle classes friendly and true merit based school. Good luck to everyone.
Esp if you're a female or athlete!
-100
Mit athletes get no admissions boost whatsoever from
Coaches. Yeah, admissions gets a notice who the coach supports but 2/3 of those kids still won’t get in. The 1/3 that do are because they are qualified. No one unqualified is getting into MIT no matter what your athletic abilities are.
It's not a huge boost, but it's a tip and with so many ultraqualified applicants, that tip can determine who gets in.
No one gets in unless qualified. No one. Coaches know ther hands are tied and tell athletes that: no guarantees, no true prereads, no commitments, and if you want to get security, we understand but go elsewhere. They also tell students they will want a 1580 sat with a minimum 790 in math.
100% incorrect. My kid is a recruited athlete at MIT, why do you keep posting stuff that you have no clue about?
Your kid was unqualified?