Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much of this could have to do with quickly getting kids back into school in person during Covid?
Unrelated to that.
It was the use of literacy curricula that do not work to teach reading. See the "Sold a story" podcast.
Nah, in many southern areas kids were only out of school for 6 weeks during covid.
It was the curriculum. Lucy Caulkins or whatever it was called. Left Va for a smaller area down south (red) and the education is 1,000x better. They still teach the basics and haven’t succumbed to woke BS. All we ever heard was how great LCPS was and found it to be lacking across the board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I keep seeing instagram videos where they ask high schoolers to read a sentence and they can't. It's not a hard sentence, but they completely couldn't read words like silhouette.
When you have rock bottom expectations for students and nonstop chromebook usage, this is what you get.
To be fair “silhouette” is a very advanced word to sound out. You need to know French spelling patterns (the dipthong ou plus the ette spelling for /et/) and they aren’t explicitly taught, as far as I know. It is also an uncommon word in general. That means the sentence you heard kids try to read was not, in fact, simple, but quite hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When comparing students that are similar to each other (FARMS, race and ethnicity, ELL and special education status) Mississippi, Florida, Texas and Louisiana all do better than Maryland and Virginia on the NAEP test.
When will our school districts wake up and realize they are failing our kids and can't keep blaming bad parenting and poverty for their failures?
https://www.urban.org/research/publication/states-demographically-adjusted-performance-2024-national-assessment
MAGA idiot please go back to your hole
Learn to read cognitively . This crap is spreading in the internet and it’s not as it appears
None of these places will educate under republican rule.
Screw off
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When comparing students that are similar to each other (FARMS, race and ethnicity, ELL and special education status) Mississippi, Florida, Texas and Louisiana all do better than Maryland and Virginia on the NAEP test.
When will our school districts wake up and realize they are failing our kids and can't keep blaming bad parenting and poverty for their failures?
https://www.urban.org/research/publication/states-demographically-adjusted-performance-2024-national-assessment
MAGA idiot please go back to your hole
Learn to read cognitively . This crap is spreading in the internet and it’s not as it appears
None of these places will educate under republican rule.
Screw off
Anonymous wrote:When comparing students that are similar to each other (FARMS, race and ethnicity, ELL and special education status) Mississippi, Florida, Texas and Louisiana all do better than Maryland and Virginia on the NAEP test.
When will our school districts wake up and realize they are failing our kids and can't keep blaming bad parenting and poverty for their failures?
https://www.urban.org/research/publication/states-demographically-adjusted-performance-2024-national-assessment
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I keep seeing instagram videos where they ask high schoolers to read a sentence and they can't. It's not a hard sentence, but they completely couldn't read words like silhouette.
When you have rock bottom expectations for students and nonstop chromebook usage, this is what you get.
To be fair “silhouette” is a very advanced word to sound out. You need to know French spelling patterns (the dipthong ou plus the ette spelling for /et/) and they aren’t explicitly taught, as far as I know. It is also an uncommon word in general. That means the sentence you heard kids try to read was not, in fact, simple, but quite hard.
Anonymous wrote:I keep seeing instagram videos where they ask high schoolers to read a sentence and they can't. It's not a hard sentence, but they completely couldn't read words like silhouette.
When you have rock bottom expectations for students and nonstop chromebook usage, this is what you get.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was a third grade teacher for 8 years before moving on to middle school. It was amazing to me how many students could not read. I am talking about basic sight words. Retaining in third grade, to me, does not solve the problem. Students showed a consistent pattern of not being able to read in those foundational years of k-2. Hold them back then. Giving students intervention in third grade but they still have to meet the third grade standards for the year is so pointless. If they are reading on a kindergarten level in first, second and third, then they should have been held back in first. But we don’t do that. The go to is always, well let’s wait and see, they will catch up, the parents don’t agree so we have to move them on. Primary years are k-2 and intermediate years are 3-5. All students should have to test out of primary years before moving into the intermediate years or in other words, this grade. Children should be held back no more than two years with intensive interventions before deciding to move them on.
What MS did and is doing is not just retaining in 3rd grade. It's so many things at the state, local, and school level.
What else, other than SoR curricula?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was a third grade teacher for 8 years before moving on to middle school. It was amazing to me how many students could not read. I am talking about basic sight words. Retaining in third grade, to me, does not solve the problem. Students showed a consistent pattern of not being able to read in those foundational years of k-2. Hold them back then. Giving students intervention in third grade but they still have to meet the third grade standards for the year is so pointless. If they are reading on a kindergarten level in first, second and third, then they should have been held back in first. But we don’t do that. The go to is always, well let’s wait and see, they will catch up, the parents don’t agree so we have to move them on. Primary years are k-2 and intermediate years are 3-5. All students should have to test out of primary years before moving into the intermediate years or in other words, this grade. Children should be held back no more than two years with intensive interventions before deciding to move them on.
What MS did and is doing is not just retaining in 3rd grade. It's so many things at the state, local, and school level.
Anonymous wrote:I was a third grade teacher for 8 years before moving on to middle school. It was amazing to me how many students could not read. I am talking about basic sight words. Retaining in third grade, to me, does not solve the problem. Students showed a consistent pattern of not being able to read in those foundational years of k-2. Hold them back then. Giving students intervention in third grade but they still have to meet the third grade standards for the year is so pointless. If they are reading on a kindergarten level in first, second and third, then they should have been held back in first. But we don’t do that. The go to is always, well let’s wait and see, they will catch up, the parents don’t agree so we have to move them on. Primary years are k-2 and intermediate years are 3-5. All students should have to test out of primary years before moving into the intermediate years or in other words, this grade. Children should be held back no more than two years with intensive interventions before deciding to move them on.
Anonymous wrote:That's probably because those states are all so racist that anyone who can afford it, sends their kids to private schools. Schools are still segregated in the South, people just have to pay for the privledge.