Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The state could simply decide not to renew the camp’s license. It expires at the end of March, and without it the camp can’t open. There is also a pending lawsuit that the old license was improperly approved because the camp did not meet state requirements even before.

https://news4sanantonio.com/news/investigations/two-locations-one-license-state-weighs-camp-mystic-renewal-after-july-4-flood-deaths

+1 great info

+1 Hoping they'll make the best decision for everyone's safety.

Agree, since the owners have a financial interest in reopening and the camp families are biased. An objective outsider needs to make the safe choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The state could simply decide not to renew the camp’s license. It expires at the end of March, and without it the camp can’t open. There is also a pending lawsuit that the old license was improperly approved because the camp did not meet state requirements even before.

https://news4sanantonio.com/news/investigations/two-locations-one-license-state-weighs-camp-mystic-renewal-after-july-4-flood-deaths

+1 great info

+1 Hoping they'll make the best decision for everyone's safety.

Agree, since the owners have a financial interest in reopening and the camp families are biased. An objective outsider needs to make the safe choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The state could simply decide not to renew the camp’s license. It expires at the end of March, and without it the camp can’t open. There is also a pending lawsuit that the old license was improperly approved because the camp did not meet state requirements even before.

https://news4sanantonio.com/news/investigations/two-locations-one-license-state-weighs-camp-mystic-renewal-after-july-4-flood-deaths

+1 great info

+1 Hoping they'll make the best decision for everyone's safety.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The state could simply decide not to renew the camp’s license. It expires at the end of March, and without it the camp can’t open. There is also a pending lawsuit that the old license was improperly approved because the camp did not meet state requirements even before.

https://news4sanantonio.com/news/investigations/two-locations-one-license-state-weighs-camp-mystic-renewal-after-july-4-flood-deaths

+1 great info

Anonymous wrote:I personally think it’s disgusting that it happened, the negligence, and that people still want to offload their kids there.
However, it’s akin to refusing to vaccinate your kids - it’s a shame, but it’s out of my control and not my business.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean obviously the demand is there. But I could never put my child into the care of that family knowing how stupid they are at best and willfully negligent at worst. But some parents care more about bragging rights. If it were just about a nice camp summer for their child, they would choose somewhere else.

This pretty much sums it up. There are options, right?

The point of one of the articles was that one of the girls who survived wanted to go back to the camp. So yes, there are other options, but that's not really the point. I don't think that mom's thought process had anything to do with bragging rights or sororities, but about helping her kid heal.

Seems more like reopening a wound to me. I could never feel safe driving away. Never.

Cool but some people believe in getting back in the saddle again. This has nothing to do with you or yours.

That's a very wet saddle.

Judge not lest ye be judged.

Anonymous wrote:The state could simply decide not to renew the camp’s license. It expires at the end of March, and without it the camp can’t open. There is also a pending lawsuit that the old license was improperly approved because the camp did not meet state requirements even before.

https://news4sanantonio.com/news/investigations/two-locations-one-license-state-weighs-camp-mystic-renewal-after-july-4-flood-deaths

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean obviously the demand is there. But I could never put my child into the care of that family knowing how stupid they are at best and willfully negligent at worst. But some parents care more about bragging rights. If it were just about a nice camp summer for their child, they would choose somewhere else.

This pretty much sums it up. There are options, right?

The point of one of the articles was that one of the girls who survived wanted to go back to the camp. So yes, there are other options, but that's not really the point. I don't think that mom's thought process had anything to do with bragging rights or sororities, but about helping her kid heal.

Seems more like reopening a wound to me. I could never feel safe driving away. Never.

Cool but some people believe in getting back in the saddle again. This has nothing to do with you or yours.

That's a very wet saddle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean obviously the demand is there. But I could never put my child into the care of that family knowing how stupid they are at best and willfully negligent at worst. But some parents care more about bragging rights. If it were just about a nice camp summer for their child, they would choose somewhere else.

This pretty much sums it up. There are options, right?

The point of one of the articles was that one of the girls who survived wanted to go back to the camp. So yes, there are other options, but that's not really the point. I don't think that mom's thought process had anything to do with bragging rights or sororities, but about helping her kid heal.

Seems more like reopening a wound to me. I could never feel safe driving away. Never.

Cool but some people believe in getting back in the saddle again. This has nothing to do with you or yours.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean obviously the demand is there. But I could never put my child into the care of that family knowing how stupid they are at best and willfully negligent at worst. But some parents care more about bragging rights. If it were just about a nice camp summer for their child, they would choose somewhere else.

This pretty much sums it up. There are options, right?

The point of one of the articles was that one of the girls who survived wanted to go back to the camp. So yes, there are other options, but that's not really the point. I don't think that mom's thought process had anything to do with bragging rights or sororities, but about helping her kid heal.

Seems more like reopening a wound to me. I could never feel safe driving away. Never.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there still at least one BODY they haven’t recovered?

Yes.

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there still at least one BODY they haven’t recovered?