Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Naturalized citizen here. Sadly, the US has no history of meaningful civil protest, except for the Vietnam Era, and even that was not successful. So people have no clue how to protest, and their first thought is leaving.
Uh, the Vietnam wars protests absolutely worked. Except when they tormented returning soldiers who had been drafted.
OP, I understand, but now is the time to fight, not flee. Also, this is destabilizing the world, so I'm not sure we'd make out better elsewhere.
There’s no evidence that anti-war protests during Vietnam had the slightest impact. Until very late, the majority of Americans supported involvement in Vietnam, and if anything the protests fueled the perception that American was lawless and out of control, which Nixon handily exploited. Vietnam became unpopular due to (1) lack of progress on the battlefield (ie.the “credibility gap”), and (2) war inflation and taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Naturalized citizen here. Sadly, the US has no history of meaningful civil protest, except for the Vietnam Era, and even that was not successful. So people have no clue how to protest, and their first thought is leaving.
Uh, the Vietnam wars protests absolutely worked. Except when they tormented returning soldiers who had been drafted.
OP, I understand, but now is the time to fight, not flee. Also, this is destabilizing the world, so I'm not sure we'd make out better elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Naturalized citizen here. Sadly, the US has no history of meaningful civil protest, except for the Vietnam Era, and even that was not successful. So people have no clue how to protest, and their first thought is leaving.
Anonymous wrote:Naturalized citizen here. Sadly, the US has no history of meaningful civil protest, except for the Vietnam Era, and even that was not successful. So people have no clue how to protest, and their first thought is leaving.
Anonymous wrote:I used to teach adult ESL classes. My students had been lawyers, doctors, accountants, pharmacists, scientists, shop owners, etc. in their home countries. Here in the US they were working as janitors, taxi drivers, daycare and home health aids, maids - things that didn't require English fluency.
I'm sure that they never expected that they would need to flee their country. But they did.
By the time people with money are ready to leave a country, it is often too late for them to leave.
Anonymous wrote:LOL PP, love the reverse psychology!
Though disagree wholeheartedly with your last line -- gross. They need to be desirable and that's 100% on them.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone ask why we have an alt right problem, and aim to address the root causes?
Anonymous wrote:Greenland is a such a sideshow. The characterization of an invasion is incorrect because there is no force there defending Greenland so no fight is possible and it’s already NATO territory. A deal will be signed where the US explores adding bases, Trump declares victory, does a little dance, and this will fade into the background where it belongs. The Europeans want this because they want keep the status quo of US troops in harms way in Europe in case the Russians show up.Anonymous wrote:As Greenland goes, so too the future of the US. We will be hated even if feared. Of these, I'd actually rather not be hated. Without allies, without NATO, without morality on our side, good luck making a stand PP - this country is not ours it's our government who owns it. It hasn't been the people running it for decades. Anyone telling you different is lying or a fool. There is no actual democracy. Socialist state yes but democracy + capitalism is not ever ever ever ever going to be a democracy. The money will run the govt. 1000000% of the time - be logical not emotional.
Anonymous wrote:Naturalized citizen here. Sadly, the US has no history of meaningful civil protest, except for the Vietnam Era, and even that was not successful. So people have no clue how to protest, and their first thought is leaving.
Anonymous wrote:But isn’t that every election since modern times. DC has never supposed a Republican candidate that I can remember.Anonymous wrote:Well, about 95% of DC voters voted against this, yet here we are with Trump ruining our city, country, and world as a whole. Where are we supposed to go?