Anonymous wrote:If most Greenlanders doesn't want to be part of the US (to their own detriment) than I think we should respect their wishes? My question is, why wouldn't they want to be part of the US? We are the most advanced country in the world. We have an excellent public school system. In fact, Id rather be educated in the poorest school district in America than literally anywhere else outside the US. We have the best hospitals and most advanced mericine in the world. Literally every other country is behind us in terms of modern medicine. The vast majority of medical advancements happen the US. The US can make any country look like a 3rd world country.
Oh yea, everything goes back to the Epstein files. Dems will talking about those files 50 years from now, like people talked about the JFK files for all those years. Can someone tell me why Biden didn’t release the files ?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who gives an F about Greenland. We have more than enough issues here to worry about; why are we concerned with taking over some country that as far as I can tell we have no right to take.
Because Trump needs more distractions from the Epstein files so we’ll all stop talking about how he was supplying girls for a world’s biggest pedo ring.
Anonymous wrote:Who gives an F about Greenland. We have more than enough issues here to worry about; why are we concerned with taking over some country that as far as I can tell we have no right to take.
Anonymous wrote:Well, the new Donroe doctrine says we can. You have to keep up.Anonymous wrote:Look, we are talking about Denmark’s colony here; we can’t just take their colony from them.
Greenland belongs to Denmark.
Well, that is the point of this thread, see the title. If you have something else to discuss/complain about, there is probably a separate thread for that, or start one for your topic of choice. But this one is about Greenland.Anonymous wrote:Who gives an F about Greenland. We have more than enough issues here to worry about; why are we concerned with taking over some country that as far as I can tell we have no right to take.
Well, the new Donroe doctrine says we can. You have to keep up.Anonymous wrote:Look, we are talking about Denmark’s colony here; we can’t just take their colony from them.
Greenland belongs to Denmark.
Anonymous wrote:If most Greenlanders doesn't want to be part of the US (to their own detriment) than I think we should respect their wishes? My question is, why wouldn't they want to be part of the US? We are the most advanced country in the world. We have an excellent public school system. In fact, Id rather be educated in the poorest school district in America than literally anywhere else outside the US. We have the best hospitals and most advanced mericine in the world. Literally every other country is behind us in terms of modern medicine. The vast majority of medical advancements happen the US. The US can make any country look like a 3rd world country.
Yeah right, maybe go back and review the election results, must have been all bots, uh. You still didn’t address the substance of any post, because you can’t.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeh, care to back that statement up with something ? You can’t.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Treated by who exactly, the vaunted Danish military ? Like it or not, Trump has the “cards” on this one.Anonymous wrote:If the US is serious about "taking over" Greenland, then it is at least as great as security threat to Western Europe as Russia is.
And should be treated accordingly.
No. He doesn't. You are a fool.
This has to be a Russian or Chinese bot. Anyone who is supporting the Orange Cheeto & MAGA at this point is a TRAITOR to the US.
Anonymous wrote:Oh yeh right. First, the UK would stay completely out this, they know where their bread is buttered. So that leaves the French to fire nuclear weapons at Russia to save Greenland for Denmark. Good one.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WTF are you talking about ? If the US decided to put more installations there it, it would be up to whatever is left to stop them. The French have one aircraft carrier, the Germans have zero, the French carrier would never make it out of port. The rest of NATO is defensive, not offensive. They are deathly afraid of this country called Russia, ever heard of them ? They’re not moving any troops to defend Greenland against the US. That’s a joke.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no NATO without the US. That’s a reality you can’t deny when you start analyzing the relative military capabilities. T of course knows this.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Treated by who exactly, the vaunted Danish military ? Like it or not, Trump has the “cards” on this one.Anonymous wrote:If the US is serious about "taking over" Greenland, then it is at least as great as security threat to Western Europe as Russia is.
And should be treated accordingly.
NATO
You're thinking the US would commit to a full scale global conflict? No, they wouldn't. There are more than enough military resources to push back on Trump. And the global sanctions against the US would be crippling. The US would be descend into the relative dark ages for the sole purpose of entertaining the mad king.
Both UK and France have submarines with nuclear missiles that can reach Valdai or wherever Putin is hiding.
There have been a lot of stupid posts on this thread, but you have truly surpassed them all by a wide margin. Congratulations !
Anonymous wrote:What does Obama like to say, “elections have consequences.” Honestly, it all goes back to Biden and whoever pulled the strings to keep him in the race that long.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Setting aside how he has gone about it, what's wrong with the idea of Greenland joining the US. It cannot be negative for the very small population over there, and could be positive for them. As for the US many many benefits. So, setting aside the rhetoric, what's wrong?
The entitlement and sense of superiority of people from the United States is astonishing. Disgusting.