Anonymous wrote:They are telling you very very clearly that if you are that interested in STEM and only in STEM, UVA is not the right school for you. V Tech is a better fit.
Anonymous wrote:Of course Dean J says its 'holistic'. Makes her job look important.
But in reality they have too many applications to sort through.
At TJ ( I am looking at Naviance as I type this) not a SINGLE applicant was declined if they had GPA over 4.47
and
not a SINGLE application got accepted if the GPA was below 4.32
Clearly they are based of GPA. The Naviance chart looks like those weather forecasts...with a clear 'front' of accepts, behind which are declines..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dean J keeps stressing that UVA does a holistic review.
But in reality all they look at is course selection ( did u take the hardest courses) and what grades did u get.
So is the “holistic” part just an act to be like a more “elite” school?
They are serious about rigor. Engineering applicant from NOVA with 4.5 and 1560 was waitlisted. Maxed out on math, history and science APs but did not bother to take Lang or lit. I warned him! Thats okay. 3rd year at UMD with a Google internship summer of 26.
This is where I get really annoyed with UVA admissions. I say that as an alum and as a parent of a kid who just applied. Your kid sounds great and it's UVA's loss. My kid also maxxed out on AP classes in most subjects, BUT he stopped taking a foreign language to do it. The classes he wanted to take wouldn't all fit if he took it so he made a choice. We supported him following his interests. We'll see what UVA does.
They say what they want and then you get mad when their decision reflects that? We all know they consider language a core subject.
No I don't know what their decision is yet. I disagree with their formulaic focus on a foreign language in admissions, no matter what the kid's interests. I think they should consider the transcript more broadly in light of its rigor and the student's interests, not one particular subject. It seems ludicrous to penalize a STEM kid for taking a two-period AP science course instead of continuing with a foreign language.
UVA is far from the only top school for which four years of a language is recommended. At any of these schools you will be competing for admission against students who took an equally rigorous curriculum as you AND also did four years of a language. That includes other “STEM kids”. You may disagree with this, but it’s a fact and it won’t change. Any student who wants to be competitive simply has to do that instead of “following their interests”. If you advised your kid otherwise you did your kid a disservice.
Anonymous wrote:Is there ever an instance where a 3.5 kid can get in coming from Sidwell or NCS (no APs)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dean J keeps stressing that UVA does a holistic review.
But in reality all they look at is course selection ( did u take the hardest courses) and what grades did u get.
So is the “holistic” part just an act to be like a more “elite” school?
They are serious about rigor. Engineering applicant from NOVA with 4.5 and 1560 was waitlisted. Maxed out on math, history and science APs but did not bother to take Lang or lit. I warned him! Thats okay. 3rd year at UMD with a Google internship summer of 26.
This is where I get really annoyed with UVA admissions. I say that as an alum and as a parent of a kid who just applied. Your kid sounds great and it's UVA's loss. My kid also maxxed out on AP classes in most subjects, BUT he stopped taking a foreign language to do it. The classes he wanted to take wouldn't all fit if he took it so he made a choice. We supported him following his interests. We'll see what UVA does.
They say what they want and then you get mad when their decision reflects that? We all know they consider language a core subject.
No I don't know what their decision is yet. I disagree with their formulaic focus on a foreign language in admissions, no matter what the kid's interests. I think they should consider the transcript more broadly in light of its rigor and the student's interests, not one particular subject. It seems ludicrous to penalize a STEM kid for taking a two-period AP science course instead of continuing with a foreign language.
UVA is far from the only top school for which four years of a language is recommended. At any of these schools you will be competing for admission against students who took an equally rigorous curriculum as you AND also did four years of a language. That includes other “STEM kids”. You may disagree with this, but it’s a fact and it won’t change. Any student who wants to be competitive simply has to do that instead of “following their interests”. If you advised your kid otherwise you did your kid a disservice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dean J keeps stressing that UVA does a holistic review.
But in reality all they look at is course selection ( did u take the hardest courses) and what grades did u get.
So is the “holistic” part just an act to be like a more “elite” school?
They are serious about rigor. Engineering applicant from NOVA with 4.5 and 1560 was waitlisted. Maxed out on math, history and science APs but did not bother to take Lang or lit. I warned him! Thats okay. 3rd year at UMD with a Google internship summer of 26.
This is where I get really annoyed with UVA admissions. I say that as an alum and as a parent of a kid who just applied. Your kid sounds great and it's UVA's loss. My kid also maxxed out on AP classes in most subjects, BUT he stopped taking a foreign language to do it. The classes he wanted to take wouldn't all fit if he took it so he made a choice. We supported him following his interests. We'll see what UVA does.
They say what they want and then you get mad when their decision reflects that? We all know they consider language a core subject.
No I don't know what their decision is yet. I disagree with their formulaic focus on a foreign language in admissions, no matter what the kid's interests. I think they should consider the transcript more broadly in light of its rigor and the student's interests, not one particular subject. It seems ludicrous to penalize a STEM kid for taking a two-period AP science course instead of continuing with a foreign language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dean J keeps stressing that UVA does a holistic review.
But in reality all they look at is course selection ( did u take the hardest courses) and what grades did u get.
So is the “holistic” part just an act to be like a more “elite” school?
They are serious about rigor. Engineering applicant from NOVA with 4.5 and 1560 was waitlisted. Maxed out on math, history and science APs but did not bother to take Lang or lit. I warned him! Thats okay. 3rd year at UMD with a Google internship summer of 26.
This is where I get really annoyed with UVA admissions. I say that as an alum and as a parent of a kid who just applied. Your kid sounds great and it's UVA's loss. My kid also maxxed out on AP classes in most subjects, BUT he stopped taking a foreign language to do it. The classes he wanted to take wouldn't all fit if he took it so he made a choice. We supported him following his interests. We'll see what UVA does.
They say what they want and then you get mad when their decision reflects that? We all know they consider language a core subject.
No I don't know what their decision is yet. I disagree with their formulaic focus on a foreign language in admissions, no matter what the kid's interests. I think they should consider the transcript more broadly in light of its rigor and the student's interests, not one particular subject. It seems ludicrous to penalize a STEM kid for taking a two-period AP science course instead of continuing with a foreign language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dean J keeps stressing that UVA does a holistic review.
But in reality all they look at is course selection ( did u take the hardest courses) and what grades did u get.
So is the “holistic” part just an act to be like a more “elite” school?
They are serious about rigor. Engineering applicant from NOVA with 4.5 and 1560 was waitlisted. Maxed out on math, history and science APs but did not bother to take Lang or lit. I warned him! Thats okay. 3rd year at UMD with a Google internship summer of 26.
This is where I get really annoyed with UVA admissions. I say that as an alum and as a parent of a kid who just applied. Your kid sounds great and it's UVA's loss. My kid also maxxed out on AP classes in most subjects, BUT he stopped taking a foreign language to do it. The classes he wanted to take wouldn't all fit if he took it so he made a choice. We supported him following his interests. We'll see what UVA does.
They say what they want and then you get mad when their decision reflects that? We all know they consider language a core subject.
No I don't know what their decision is yet. I disagree with their formulaic focus on a foreign language in admissions, no matter what the kid's interests. I think they should consider the transcript more broadly in light of its rigor and the student's interests, not one particular subject. It seems ludicrous to penalize a STEM kid for taking a two-period AP science course instead of continuing with a foreign language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing about UVa is that once you are admitted and actually on campus, in the program, looking for internships etc - you begin to realize that UVA is a very average school.
In SEAS, faculty and facilites are average at best. A lot of focus is on the campus which at this point is so preppy - but overall, I found UVA to be very average - compared to my brother who went to UT Austin and seemed to have so many more opportunities. I had barely a couple of job offers from Fed Contracting firms.
Maybe its better for Commerce school, but sharing what I experienced.
If you went to UVA, you would call it “grounds” not campus. So you’re clearly full of shit.
Anonymous wrote:The funny thing about UVa is that once you are admitted and actually on campus, in the program, looking for internships etc - you begin to realize that UVA is a very average school.
In SEAS, faculty and facilites are average at best. A lot of focus is on the campus which at this point is so preppy - but overall, I found UVA to be very average - compared to my brother who went to UT Austin and seemed to have so many more opportunities. I had barely a couple of job offers from Fed Contracting firms.
Maybe its better for Commerce school, but sharing what I experienced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing about UVa is that once you are admitted and actually on campus, in the program, looking for internships etc - you begin to realize that UVA is a very average school.
In SEAS, faculty and facilites are average at best. A lot of focus is on the campus which at this point is so preppy - but overall, I found UVA to be very average - compared to my brother who went to UT Austin and seemed to have so many more opportunities. I had barely a couple of job offers from Fed Contracting firms.
Maybe its better for Commerce school, but sharing what I experienced.
If you went to UVA, you would call it “grounds” not campus. So you’re clearly full of shit.
Anonymous wrote:The funny thing about UVa is that once you are admitted and actually on campus, in the program, looking for internships etc - you begin to realize that UVA is a very average school.
In SEAS, faculty and facilites are average at best. A lot of focus is on the campus which at this point is so preppy - but overall, I found UVA to be very average - compared to my brother who went to UT Austin and seemed to have so many more opportunities. I had barely a couple of job offers from Fed Contracting firms.
Maybe its better for Commerce school, but sharing what I experienced.