Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's common except the stuggle part.
The gray divorces I know (at least the women) are all financially secure and more than happy being single.
I think they ones that would face financial and emotion struggle are just white knuckling it and staying.
Or like my STBX who refused to work for 12 years while I killed my self at biglaw and in-house and now he feels entitled to half the assets. On forgot - he didn’t even raise the kids or cook/clean. I did that too.
- Women (often) get alimony and 50% of "marital assets", even if husband killed himself in big law while she was at the club (and au pair was shuttling the kids). Less provocatively, he was the primary earner in a stressful job while she enjoyed lower paying but more relaxed employment, yet...
- he loses half his net worth and -- critically -- retirement $$ at 60+, with little time to claw it back
- women are typically more social and have broader friend / support networks
- when good men marry, they (should) "grow up" and focus on family, and on work to provide for them. They lose track of partying friends and rely on work relationships that end at retirement. They may chat with their wife's friends' husbands, but that ends with divorce.
- Today's culture says "you go girl! you don't need the no stinkin' patrimony"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's common except the stuggle part.
The gray divorces I know (at least the women) are all financially secure and more than happy being single.
I think they ones that would face financial and emotion struggle are just white knuckling it and staying.
Or like my STBX who refused to work for 12 years while I killed my self at biglaw and in-house and now he feels entitled to half the assets. On forgot - he didn’t even raise the kids or cook/clean. I did that too.
- Women (often) get alimony and 50% of "marital assets", even if husband killed himself in big law while she was at the club (and au pair was shuttling the kids). Less provocatively, he was the primary earner in a stressful job while she enjoyed lower paying but more relaxed employment, yet...
- he loses half his net worth and -- critically -- retirement $$ at 60+, with little time to claw it back
- women are typically more social and have broader friend / support networks
- when good men marry, they (should) "grow up" and focus on family, and on work to provide for them. They lose track of partying friends and rely on work relationships that end at retirement. They may chat with their wife's friends' husbands, but that ends with divorce.
- Today's culture says "you go girl! you don't need the no stinkin' patrimony"
Anonymous wrote:I also think sometimes couples just have very different needs and perceptions of whether a marriage is "happy" or not. I have friends who are now getting divorced who were married for three decades. She thinks they were happy and is baffled. He thinks he's been unhappy for at least two of the last three decades and stayed because of the kids. They both agree marriage was mostly sexless. She thought that was fine and they were both okay with it. He thought it was not fine and he was lonely. She thought he was easygoing because he always let her get her way. He thought she was controlling because she got pissed off when he did not do what she wanted.
I think both of them have crappy communication skills and took each other for granted: it's like they never actually sat down and had a conversation about what they each wanted and needed, what was working, what was not. Maybe they could have made it a good and enduring marriage if they had talked about those things decades ago. They're both decent people. I don't think either of them hates the other or behaved abusively or badly. I think they just somehow managed to go through decades of marriage without actually talking about what they wanted. Which is mind-blowing.
So now she is shocked and mad and he is relieved to be out but wracked by guilt. I suspect they will both get over it and they will each find someone better suited. I just hope they have both become learned some lessons during the process. I definitely don't think they should have stayed together, though: the marriage was built on a set of mutual false assumptions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^interesting guy*
I feel sorry for your dad. You obviously don't like him and never did.
He's an alcoholic, held a gun to his head for over an hour in front of me when I was 17 and said he was going to blow his brains all over me while I was shaking like a maniac trying to talk him out of it, and cheated on my mom many times. So yep, you're right on PP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s “worrisome” about this?
OP here. We know these couples for a long time and to us they looked average (some of them even happy), not in deep troubles so we were very surprised at first.
At least in my circle, after divorce some of them shared they are struggling financially while others have very obvious mental health issues (not sure if new issues or if issues were there before and spiraled after divorce)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's considered gray divorce until you're over 60. Divorce with high school kids is just divorce.
It’s defined as 50 and over.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's considered gray divorce until you're over 60. Divorce with high school kids is just divorce.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gray divorced don't have kids in college generally.
I have always felt that there shouldn't be marriage or divorce after 60. Don't marry anyone and don't divorce. But they can have a limited divorce or paperwork outlining everything. Marriage is a business, the estate gets too complicated to split really. Health insurance is impossible, pension issues, everything. Just live your lives socially separately.
I agree with you regarding no marriage after 60, but divorce? There are many reasons described in just this thread as to why people would divorce after 60.
It becomes too harf financially for both.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gray divorced don't have kids in college generally.
I have always felt that there shouldn't be marriage or divorce after 60. Don't marry anyone and don't divorce. But they can have a limited divorce or paperwork outlining everything. Marriage is a business, the estate gets too complicated to split really. Health insurance is impossible, pension issues, everything. Just live your lives socially separately.
I agree with you regarding no marriage after 60, but divorce? There are many reasons described in just this thread as to why people would divorce after 60.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's considered gray divorce until you're over 60. Divorce with high school kids is just divorce.
You can be over 60 and have HS kids.
Not common. And if so, it isn't likely that the couple have been together that long, 25 years or less. Or Dad married a younger woman. So, still not really a gray divorce by definition. It's a divorce.
Anonymous wrote:Gray divorced don't have kids in college generally.
I have always felt that there shouldn't be marriage or divorce after 60. Don't marry anyone and don't divorce. But they can have a limited divorce or paperwork outlining everything. Marriage is a business, the estate gets too complicated to split really. Health insurance is impossible, pension issues, everything. Just live your lives socially separately.