Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assets minus liabilities. Include home equity. Don't include value of expected pension. And don't lie or exaggerate. No reason to. This is an anonymous forum!
I think posters should include expected pension- that makes a huge difference. As does expected inheritance, if any. I don’t have either of those, but a number of friends will receive inheritances in the millions (they don’t brag about it, but I know their parents and family situations well enough to estimate).
Smart people don’t include inheritances in their long-term planning. The parents can have unexpected medical expenses, get estranged from their children, become widowed and marry gold-diggers, suddenly decide to leave everything to their neighbors cat……
You don't include an inheritance in your net worth until you actually get it. Because yes, things can change. But once you have the $$, it is most definitely part of your net worth, no matter how you "got it"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand including your home in your net worth. We certainly don’t as we don’t ever plan on living in the streets.
It's included because it's a real asset that can be liquidated if needed/desired. As any financial planner would tell you, you don't include the equity in your home as an income stream in retirement if you plan on living in it forever -- but it's certainly an asset regardless. When you croak, the house goes to your heirs. It doesn't simply disappear.
And many people don't plan on living in their current home forever. It's not "live here or on the street."
The inability of so many posters on DCUM to grasp the basic concept of net worth is astounding. I thought this was a website with largely educated and savvy participants. Sometimes I wonder.
When to include your house in your NW is debated on many forums, and there are reasonable arguments on both sides—no need for either of you to get so worked up. I have a spreadsheet with multiple columns to see everything together (including 529 plans and home equity), or isolate investable assets like brokerage, retirement accounts, commercial real estate, private equity, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand including your home in your net worth. We certainly don’t as we don’t ever plan on living in the streets.
It's included because it's a real asset that can be liquidated if needed/desired. As any financial planner would tell you, you don't include the equity in your home as an income stream in retirement if you plan on living in it forever -- but it's certainly an asset regardless. When you croak, the house goes to your heirs. It doesn't simply disappear.
And many people don't plan on living in their current home forever. It's not "live here or on the street."
The inability of so many posters on DCUM to grasp the basic concept of net worth is astounding. I thought this was a website with largely educated and savvy participants. Sometimes I wonder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assets minus liabilities. Include home equity. Don't include value of expected pension. And don't lie or exaggerate. No reason to. This is an anonymous forum!
I think posters should include expected pension- that makes a huge difference. As does expected inheritance, if any. I don’t have either of those, but a number of friends will receive inheritances in the millions (they don’t brag about it, but I know their parents and family situations well enough to estimate).
Smart people don’t include inheritances in their long-term planning. The parents can have unexpected medical expenses, get estranged from their children, become widowed and marry gold-diggers, suddenly decide to leave everything to their neighbors cat……
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand including your home in your net worth. We certainly don’t as we don’t ever plan on living in the streets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assets minus liabilities. Include home equity. Don't include value of expected pension. And don't lie or exaggerate. No reason to. This is an anonymous forum!
I think posters should include expected pension- that makes a huge difference. As does expected inheritance, if any. I don’t have either of those, but a number of friends will receive inheritances in the millions (they don’t brag about it, but I know their parents and family situations well enough to estimate).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assets minus liabilities. Include home equity. Don't include value of expected pension. And don't lie or exaggerate. No reason to. This is an anonymous forum!
I think posters should include expected pension- that makes a huge difference. As does expected inheritance, if any. I don’t have either of those, but a number of friends will receive inheritances in the millions (they don’t brag about it, but I know their parents and family situations well enough to estimate).
The question wasn't "what's your retirement plan" or "do you expect an inheritance." It's what's your net worth.
There's no difference, for example, between "expected pension" and expected Social Security. No one includes their Social Security in their net worth.
Net worth is a real financial term. It means "assets minus liabilities." Not "assets minus liabilities plus expected pension or social security."
You can cash out pensions but not SS. So not exactly the same.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing is funnier than childless women bragging about their mediocre net worth as if it is an accomplishment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assets minus liabilities. Include home equity. Don't include value of expected pension. And don't lie or exaggerate. No reason to. This is an anonymous forum!
I think posters should include expected pension- that makes a huge difference. As does expected inheritance, if any. I don’t have either of those, but a number of friends will receive inheritances in the millions (they don’t brag about it, but I know their parents and family situations well enough to estimate).
The question wasn't "what's your retirement plan" or "do you expect an inheritance." It's what's your net worth.
There's no difference, for example, between "expected pension" and expected Social Security. No one includes their Social Security in their net worth.
Net worth is a real financial term. It means "assets minus liabilities." Not "assets minus liabilities plus expected pension or social security."
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand including your home in your net worth. We certainly don’t as we don’t ever plan on living in the streets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assets minus liabilities. Include home equity. Don't include value of expected pension. And don't lie or exaggerate. No reason to. This is an anonymous forum!
I think posters should include expected pension- that makes a huge difference. As does expected inheritance, if any. I don’t have either of those, but a number of friends will receive inheritances in the millions (they don’t brag about it, but I know their parents and family situations well enough to estimate).
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand including your home in your net worth. We certainly don’t as we don’t ever plan on living in the streets.