Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We asked our kids to get their own insurance plans through their employers. Yes, it costs them but we felt it's important for them to become independent. We randomly give them more money than what they spend but we stopped paying for insurance once they got employed.
This trend of employed kids living at home, staying on parental insurance and phone plan etc is enabling them to have a faux lifestyle they can't afford. They need to learn to be self sufficient and live within their means. I see young women carry designer bags, wear overpriced shoes, travel to exotic places, eat at fancy restaurants and drive luxury cars but not having money to pay for healthcare or utilities. What's up with that?
I agree on everything but the travel. Traveling while young was the best part of my life
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We asked our kids to get their own insurance plans through their employers. Yes, it costs them but we felt it's important for them to become independent. We randomly give them more money than what they spend but we stopped paying for insurance once they got employed.
This trend of employed kids living at home, staying on parental insurance and phone plan etc is enabling them to have a faux lifestyle they can't afford. They need to learn to be self sufficient and live within their means. I see young women carry designer bags, wear overpriced shoes, travel to exotic places, eat at fancy restaurants and drive luxury cars but not having money to pay for healthcare or utilities. What's up with that?
Why waste money? Plenty of us allow our kids to stay on our healthcare (which is cheaper or no added cost) and cell phone plans (saves $40+ per kid per month) and they don't live a faux lifestyle. They are saving their money and living within their means. They can stay on our cell phone plans until they get married. Why waste money---it doesn't make them "independent". They are already fully functioning adults. If needed you can charge them for the cell plan....but we just consider it a gift.
We also let them use our Amazon and they just switch it to their CC and address. Why pay $120+/year if they can use ours?
Not PP but we also weened them off. Being independent serves them more than saving $20 here $40 there.
Anonymous wrote:This is a consequence of waiting until you are old to have children
Anonymous wrote:How many of you actually have kids who are 20-26? I would venture very few. We have one just out of college, and his employer offers a crap medical plan (high deductible, no HSA and no assistance) and one still in college. It's not the kids who are failing, it's the crap system. We need a country that gives a damn about providing basic health insurance for it's citizens that isn't tied to employment. The ACA was supposed to do that, but the GOP stripped the ACA of many needed pieces to make it successful
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We asked our kids to get their own insurance plans through their employers. Yes, it costs them but we felt it's important for them to become independent. We randomly give them more money than what they spend but we stopped paying for insurance once they got employed.
This trend of employed kids living at home, staying on parental insurance and phone plan etc is enabling them to have a faux lifestyle they can't afford. They need to learn to be self sufficient and live within their means. I see young women carry designer bags, wear overpriced shoes, travel to exotic places, eat at fancy restaurants and drive luxury cars but not having money to pay for healthcare or utilities. What's up with that?
PREACH!
These parents don’t want their adult babies to grow up.
All under the guise of “ we’re rich/can afford it”
Nope.
Anonymous wrote:We asked our kids to get their own insurance plans through their employers. Yes, it costs them but we felt it's important for them to become independent. We randomly give them more money than what they spend but we stopped paying for insurance once they got employed.
This trend of employed kids living at home, staying on parental insurance and phone plan etc is enabling them to have a faux lifestyle they can't afford. They need to learn to be self sufficient and live within their means. I see young women carry designer bags, wear overpriced shoes, travel to exotic places, eat at fancy restaurants and drive luxury cars but not having money to pay for healthcare or utilities. What's up with that?
Anonymous wrote:My youngest kid is 21.
My DH is 59. He is ready to retire.
Anonymous wrote:This is a consequence of waiting until you are old to have children
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We asked our kids to get their own insurance plans through their employers. Yes, it costs them but we felt it's important for them to become independent. We randomly give them more money than what they spend but we stopped paying for insurance once they got employed.
This trend of employed kids living at home, staying on parental insurance and phone plan etc is enabling them to have a faux lifestyle they can't afford. They need to learn to be self sufficient and live within their means. I see young women carry designer bags, wear overpriced shoes, travel to exotic places, eat at fancy restaurants and drive luxury cars but not having money to pay for healthcare or utilities. What's up with that?
Why waste money? Plenty of us allow our kids to stay on our healthcare (which is cheaper or no added cost) and cell phone plans (saves $40+ per kid per month) and they don't live a faux lifestyle. They are saving their money and living within their means. They can stay on our cell phone plans until they get married. Why waste money---it doesn't make them "independent". They are already fully functioning adults. If needed you can charge them for the cell plan....but we just consider it a gift.
We also let them use our Amazon and they just switch it to their CC and address. Why pay $120+/year if they can use ours?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see my kids and grandkids as my legacy. A way to pass on my genes and continue the family line. It is basic biology. For me it is important to see my kids succeed not only for themselves but also so that they can give the same benefits to my grandkids and other descendents. I have invested time, effort, money, sweat, blood and tears to raise my kids. They know that they are very precious to me. I will give them all the benefits that I can, but, I will also make sure that my kids are worthy kids. Whatever time, love, affection, care, direction, guidance, support, communication, community, network - I need to give to them, I have given to them and will continue to give.
All of this is because you need to raise good and intelligent kids. Because once you have good-for-nothing, lazy, greedy, morally sick children - you do not get a do over.
I think the issue is if you give a lot, some kids will get lazy as a result of being given a lot. I struggle with this as dh and I were given nothing at all after 18. It motivated us and made us grow up very fast. I sometimes worry that helping our kids so much more (they are in college now and it's something I ponder a lot as we provide a lot of help) is going to make them less motivated to achieve. I am really surprised young working adults would be on their parents' plans.
Anonymous wrote:We asked our kids to get their own insurance plans through their employers. Yes, it costs them but we felt it's important for them to become independent. We randomly give them more money than what they spend but we stopped paying for insurance once they got employed.
This trend of employed kids living at home, staying on parental insurance and phone plan etc is enabling them to have a faux lifestyle they can't afford. They need to learn to be self sufficient and live within their means. I see young women carry designer bags, wear overpriced shoes, travel to exotic places, eat at fancy restaurants and drive luxury cars but not having money to pay for healthcare or utilities. What's up with that?