Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.
I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.
WTF are YOU talking about?!?!?!
There has been an EXPLOSION of rightwing violence since Kirk died! Are you serious?? You don’t think anything has happened???? Really???????
Link?
Watch any news source other than fox or other rightwing media. It’s all over the place. Theres been shootings, arson, bombings - all over Kirk.
Look for yourself. I’m not going to spoon feed you links.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a “men” thing. This is a white men thing. Let’s be clear about that.
Nah, it's definitely a man thing, but it might be a poor/ uneducated man thing. I live in a very diverse neighborhood and the white men are all walking doodle dogs and wearing babies. I've seen some violence but it's always been men of color, because that's who's poor/ uneducated where I live. If I lived in Appalachia, it would be a totally different story.
Those white men walking doodles and wearing babies are the white men that shoot up schools, churches, and gay nightclubs. Just because they’re walking a $2,000 designer dog or toting their kid around doesn’t mean they aren’t a sociopathic monster.
Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a “men” thing. This is a white men thing. Let’s be clear about that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a “men” thing. This is a white men thing. Let’s be clear about that.
Nah, it's definitely a man thing, but it might be a poor/ uneducated man thing. I live in a very diverse neighborhood and the white men are all walking doodle dogs and wearing babies. I've seen some violence but it's always been men of color, because that's who's poor/ uneducated where I live. If I lived in Appalachia, it would be a totally different story.
Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a “men” thing. This is a white men thing. Let’s be clear about that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.
I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.
WTF are YOU talking about?!?!?!
There has been an EXPLOSION of rightwing violence since Kirk died! Are you serious?? You don’t think anything has happened???? Really???????
Link?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was in Europe for two weeks. Noticeably lacking white male rage and misogyny. No one was driving a big truck to compensate, gay guys walking around holding hands, effeminate men just being themselves. It was liberating and fresh.
What are they doing right that we aren’t?
Wow. You really don't know anything about Europe (hint: read up on the French protests and the bubbling populist movements in multiple countries and the voter anger over migration).
Silly topic and silly thread. If we want to play this game, I'll put it out there: there is no group as angry and vengeful as as women, especially progressive left wing women who claim the mantle of "kindness" while hating and shunning anyone who disagrees with their ideologies.
Anonymous wrote:Because they don't spend enough time lifting weights and reading Marcus Aurelius.