Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's all the royals. Conservatives yearn for a hierarchy they think they would be near the top of. It's the same as poor people voting republican: they somehow imagine that their future involves moving in those circles themselves. They are blind to the contempt in which Rs hold them. "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."

Oh, and there's the racial aspect. When Meghan came onto the scene, they were aghast that a black women could be elevated above them, and rallied around Kate, whose whiteness makes her automatically superior in their eyes.

Get over yourself... most people wouldn't have even known Meghan was biracial until they saw her mom. No one cares. But lots of people thought she was a social climbing attention-seeker, totally out-of-step with royal tradition. And guess what? We were right.

And the Middletons aren't social climbers? All three Middleton children married rich and have never worked. Kate followed William for 10 years, even changing unis and majors to get near him (Anna Pasternak's article lays it all out; it's great reading if you're not afraid.) Get over your own sycophantic self.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the discussion in the other thread, it is curious that while the Princess of Wales is beloved across the world, I do think it’s true that upper class women in the South definitely seem to admire her a lot.

I’m a bit confused because we don’t really have hierarchy or status here in the US so why do conservative women act like they’re…equivalent to Kate?

She’s a professional housewife. That’s why. Conservative women….

This is a very Western viewpoint and very closed minded.

She is much more than a housewife. She sits on tons of committees and boards and heads up programs for nurturing little ones.

Her name is on those positions, but Kate Middleton does very little work. She is known for being very lazy about her Royal duties. She avoids appearances as much as she can

Yeah, it’s so lazy to limit activities when you have several small kids and cancer. What a bum!

DP. A year ago, Kate told us herself that she finished chemo, and that she was "cancer-free" (sic, it takes five years to say that), in that syrupy video. Since then, Kate's been skiing twice, has taken four international vacations and more domestic vacations, and the UK press reports that she works out rigorously every day. It's time to stop playing the cancer card. Also, all three of her kids are in school all day.

She could do some work. If she wants to live the life of a wealthy British aristocrat, then fine. But then stop taking the Sovereign Grant and duchy money from the British people. The royal family has plenty of private property and assets and she'll be fine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the discussion in the other thread, it is curious that while the Princess of Wales is beloved across the world, I do think it’s true that upper class women in the South definitely seem to admire her a lot.

I’m a bit confused because we don’t really have hierarchy or status here in the US so why do conservative women act like they’re…equivalent to Kate?

She’s a professional housewife. That’s why. Conservative women….

This is a very Western viewpoint and very closed minded.

She is much more than a housewife. She sits on tons of committees and boards and heads up programs for nurturing little ones.

Her name is on those positions, but Kate Middleton does very little work. She is known for being very lazy about her Royal duties. She avoids appearances as much as she can

Yeah, it’s so lazy to limit activities when you have several small kids and cancer. What a bum!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's all the royals. Conservatives yearn for a hierarchy they think they would be near the top of. It's the same as poor people voting republican: they somehow imagine that their future involves moving in those circles themselves. They are blind to the contempt in which Rs hold them. "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."

Oh, and there's the racial aspect. When Meghan came onto the scene, they were aghast that a black women could be elevated above them, and rallied around Kate, whose whiteness makes her automatically superior in their eyes.

Get over yourself... most people wouldn't have even known Meghan was biracial until they saw her mom. No one cares. But lots of people thought she was a social climbing attention-seeker, totally out-of-step with royal tradition. And guess what? We were right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that does that mean it was all liberal posters saying Kate didn't really have cancer and was actually just an eating disordered AI hologram who was playing games because her husband was cheating and divorcing her? Those were all real posts during the epic wheres Kate photo thread.

See how silly it is to distort everything through the lens of US politics?

Literally this lol. The whole thing around Kate and Meghan is ridiculous. There are a ton of crazy people on the internet (and in real life, but I haven't encountered them) who hate Meghan and prop up Kate and those who hate Kate and prop up Meghan. The things I've seen said about both of these women are insane. I'm a raging liberal and like Kate. I first was interested in following her because as someone with a history of addiction in my family, I really liked that one of her first patronages was about destigmatizing addition.

Between William and Kate, their interests are early childhood development, addiction, helping women in prison, mental health, fighting climate change, the arts, cancer research, and children's hospice care. Some of those have overlap with conservative interests, some do not. Their statement about Israel and Gaza was much better than a lot of democrats that I've seen. I honestly think they both are very smart to keep most of their personal thoughts and feelings private. That makes a lot of people think they're boring but if the worst people are saying about you is that you're boring, that's probably a good thing.

Ma'am Kate hasn't done anything tangible for her Early years program. Not one thing. She rarely does a speech or meeting but nothing tangible. She put out a Five Things list or something about early development that she took from an already established early development think tank and charity. She has been married in since 2011 and has very little to show for it.

As for addiction and women in prison, she made two visits in her 14 years of marriage and that's all I can find on the manner.

Heads Together was a charity developed by Prince Harry via their joint foundation. His team put together the events, Harry planned them, and Kate and William showed up for the photo
ops. When Harry left the charity remained with Kate and William and they haven't done any events since.

William only recently started Earthshot, his environmental charity, and by all accounts including his own it's more of a commercial endeavor than an outright charity. Winners are promised $5 million over several years to see their projects to commercial success however most winners have not received anywhere close to that amount and some have had to fold their research projects entirely. Every year the Earthshot gala is held in a different country which means a ton of travel for all involved learning to environmental harm. Also, Earthshot takes in tens of millions from Billionaire funders who themselves have made their money in industries that harm the environment. And recent reports have shown that the "charity" spends more on yearly overhead than it does actually finding the projects that won the monetary prize. Earthshot is not living up to its mission statement and is barely an actual charity.

Neither William and Kate have done much for cancer research or children's hospice besides go visit for photo ops a handful of times on 14 years. They haven't donated their own money. They haven't brought others in to help fund them either. Rose Hanbury, William's sometime affair partner and Kate's ex-friend, did put together charity garden parties for children's hospice care to which William and Kate attended. That's about it.

It's 2025, let's stop propping up rich people with unearned and unwarranted accolades.

Anonymous wrote:It's all the royals. Conservatives yearn for a hierarchy they think they would be near the top of. It's the same as poor people voting republican: they somehow imagine that their future involves moving in those circles themselves. They are blind to the contempt in which Rs hold them. "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."

Oh, and there's the racial aspect. When Meghan came onto the scene, they were aghast that a black women could be elevated above them, and rallied around Kate, whose whiteness makes her automatically superior in their eyes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her fashion choices are kind of similar to prominent republican women a little twee, really long hair past the age most women wear their hair long. She does her makeup similarly to MAGA face with the the black eyeliner and prominent blush. But Kate does it better because she hasn’t overinflated her lips like most of them do. Etc

Disagree. MAGA women look like whores with fake unbrushed hair, stilettos, fake faces, inappropriate clothing
Catherine wears modest, beautiful clothing and nothing fake (maybe hair extensions). I admire that the BRF are not fake.

Anonymous wrote:I could not be more liberal and I LOVE her. She has a grace that you can feel. There's a certain sort of ugly and beautiful that comes out if people from the inside - makeup can't hide it nor help it. She's a good person, not perfect, but real. That's kinda enough.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's all the royals. Conservatives yearn for a hierarchy they think they would be near the top of. It's the same as poor people voting republican: they somehow imagine that their future involves moving in those circles themselves. They are blind to the contempt in which Rs hold them. "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."

Oh, and there's the racial aspect. When Meghan came onto the scene, they were aghast that a black women could be elevated above them, and rallied around Kate, whose whiteness makes her automatically superior in their eyes.

It's important to acknowledge that Meghan's been the subject of a palace-tabloid war for years, because she and Harry basically outshone the Waleses, and that couldn't continue. Racists and conservative hierarchy-obsessives loved, loved, loved this hate campaign, and here we are.

(FWIW, I'm an older white woman, but I have tons of high-placed British relatives, including one in the UK foreign office, and I know a little about how the British royal rota works. The palaces feed their pet rota "journalists" dirt on the Sussexes in exchange for positive coverage, and that's just the start.)

It's hard to overestimate the impact Harry and Meghan had in the first few months of their joint royal work together. And how their work ethic (see: Meghan's Grenfell Towers cookbook and capsule wardrobe for a women's charity) put Kate and William to shame. QEII kept sending Harry and Meghan on important trips, such as to Australia and Africa, while the Waleses' Caribbean tour was a complete disaster (see: Jamaica telling William they were withdrawing from the Commonwealth, and photos of Kate and William touching black children through a wire fence and wearing colonial khakis while riding a jeep as the "natives" bowed). Kate and William haven't done major trips overseas since, and there's a reason.

Which is why William will never, ever let Harry and Meghan return to royal work. As if the Sussexes wanted that, but that's another discussion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are republican women obsessed with status? Most of them are housewives and undereducated. Neither of these confer status unless you marry rich/up. I guess all republican women aspire to marry up and Kate is the blue print.

Totally incorrect.

How small is your circle?

Anonymous wrote:It's all the royals. Conservatives yearn for a hierarchy they think they would be near the top of. It's the same as poor people voting republican: they somehow imagine that their future involves moving in those circles themselves. They are blind to the contempt in which Rs hold them. "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."

Oh, and there's the racial aspect. When Meghan came onto the scene, they were aghast that a black women could be elevated above them, and rallied around Kate, whose whiteness makes her automatically superior in their eyes.

Anonymous wrote:Why are republican women obsessed with status? Most of them are housewives and undereducated. Neither of these confer status unless you marry rich/up. I guess all republican women aspire to marry up and Kate is the blue print.

Anonymous wrote:It's all the royals. Conservatives yearn for a hierarchy they think they would be near the top of. It's the same as poor people voting republican: they somehow imagine that their future involves moving in those circles themselves. They are blind to the contempt in which Rs hold them. "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."

Oh, and there's the racial aspect. When Meghan came onto the scene, they were aghast that a black women could be elevated above them, and rallied around Kate, whose whiteness makes her automatically superior in their eyes.

Anonymous wrote:Most of the world thinks well of Kate.
Conservatives have an affinity for class systems and hierarchies of all types, and conservative women naturally gravitate towards respect for Royalty and a desire to follow a Princess whose job is to dress conservatively and elegantly all throughout her life.

I don't follow what Republican women like or don't like. But I see this with women from conservative/patriarchal cultures in many countries, notably Japan, where I am from. They all aspire to have that poise, willowy figure, and tasteful clothes.