Anonymous wrote:Nonsense, all were bunched together at the top until 2019. There are only two changes since then.Anonymous wrote:Hamilton and Middlebury are fine schools but not in the same conversation of Amherst or Bowdoin and Williams.
1. An increase in the DEI weighting factors
2. The change in resources per student calculation to use the 12 month number rather than the fall number.
Nothing actually changed at any of these schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s face it the NESCAC is Williams and Amherst. Only 2 with any prestige.
agree but kids are only even there for the most part because their ivy aspirations were derailed -
Haha, not!
It is the same poster pretending to. E two people. They have done this before.
Anonymous wrote:Nonsense, all were bunched together at the top until 2019. There are only two changes since then.Anonymous wrote:Hamilton and Middlebury are fine schools but not in the same conversation of Amherst or Bowdoin and Williams.
1. An increase in the DEI weighting factors
2. The change in resources per student calculation to use the 12 month number rather than the fall number.
Nothing actually changed at any of these schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know people who got into Dartmouth, Brown and Yale, but not Williams. I also know people who turned down Princeton and Brown for Williams. It happens.
I know a girls lx player at Brown who was turned down by Tufts and Middlebury. Probably not the norm but it happens.
Anonymous wrote:I know people who got into Dartmouth, Brown and Yale, but not Williams. I also know people who turned down Princeton and Brown for Williams. It happens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s face it the NESCAC is Williams and Amherst. Only 2 with any prestige.
agree but kids are only even there for the most part because their ivy aspirations were derailed -
Haha, not!
Anonymous wrote:any athlete who has the academic chops to get into the upper Nescac schools would prefer to be at an ivy league- they just weren’t good enough at their sport to get recruited. Nescac is the land of failed ivy wannabees. I think most would choose the dregs of the ivy - Cornell - over Amherst and Williams
Anonymous wrote:Try as they have for many months, Midd boosters can’t face the facts. Your school Middlebury is no longer in the same grouping of Amherst, Willams, or now Bowdoin. Its endowment is half of the other three schools. Applications have dropped at Midd and they had a financial deficit. Don’t need to hear the same rebuttal that a grad from the 70’s is the COO of some bank who cares. Times have changed agree with several others Colby, Hamilton, Midd, and Bates are interchangeable. Have not any interest in these small, remote schools with horrible weather and no location diversity as in host towns. These are not Ute 60s and 70s when those schools plateaued. They appeal to a small full pay private school clientele whose kids can’t get into the Ivies, Duke, and Stanford.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton and Middlebury are fine schools but not in the same conversation of Amherst or Bowdoin and Williams.
Bowdoin boosters have entered the chat, trying to lump B in with WASP. Not happening. Stats of Bowdoin kids SAT, ACT, etc) are nearly identical to Middlebury’s. And neither are at AWS level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton and Middlebury are nowhere near the prestige level of Amherst and Williams.
Agree. Not saying this is the end all or be all but this statement is true
Nonsense, all were bunched together at the top until 2019. There are only two changes since then.Anonymous wrote:Hamilton and Middlebury are fine schools but not in the same conversation of Amherst or Bowdoin and Williams.
Anonymous wrote:No one is turning down an Ivy unless they prefer sleepy Williamstown.