Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to Duke and my spouse went to Dartmouth. We’d go to the SLAC our son attends over our alma maters in a heartbeat. #IYKYK
Which SLAC? I went to Dartmouth and I would love to know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WASP is the best. The top 15 in general are very strong.
Top ten LACS are all rigorous and virtually indistinguishable. Separating out WASP from the rest is silly.
WASP + Bowdoin. Then a drop off.
Then you have your 10 schools - CMC, Mudd, Colby, Wellesley, Grinnell, Wesleyan, Carleton, Vassar, Midd, Haverford
Trajectories matter even amongst those 10, second tiers though: CMC and Mudd have rising stock, as does Wesleyan (after a downturn) and Carleton; Wellesley and Vassar are holding steady; and Midd, Haverford, Grinnell, and Colby are on a decline (especially Midd).
Anonymous wrote:I went to Duke and my spouse went to Dartmouth. We’d go to the SLAC our son attends over our alma maters in a heartbeat. #IYKYK
Anonymous wrote:My husband & I both went to ivies for college and law school. So have most of our friends. Our DD is at Brown and our DS is considering a LAC which is new for our family.
Which of the following LACs have the most global and national prestige?
Williams: seems like the best one overall in terms of rep
Williams, Amherst, Wesleyan: "little three"
Williams, Amherst: I see them referred to as Ivy lite?
Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore, Pomona: often grouped together as WASP?
Bowdoin, Middlebury: For my non-Ivy/Stanford friends, these seem like the net two highest in terms of prestige
Wesleyan: is this as prestigious as it used to be?
Carleton, Haverford: next most intellectually rigorous in terms of rep, but we prefer northeast to midwest
Anonymous wrote:Culture matters to some people, so some people don't pick purely based on prestige or ranking. That's why there are some people who turn down Princeton to go to Brown, or turn down Amherst to go to Wesleyan. I'm not saying Brown is as selective or prestigious as Princeton, or that Wesleyan is as selective and prestigious as Amherst. I'm just saying some people choose the less selective and prestigious options and have good reasons for their choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:honestly from a pure prestige perspective - and I have no dog in this fight - the only two that are stand outs are Amherst and Williams. Every other SLAC is just one of the bunch
Boom. There it is. Facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:for me Williams and Pomona are tops. Amherst feels a little dusty.
Keep pushing that Pomona thing little girl. Maybe someday dreams will come true.
Anonymous wrote:for me Williams and Pomona are tops. Amherst feels a little dusty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WASP is the best. The top 15 in general are very strong.
Top ten LACS are all rigorous and virtually indistinguishable. Separating out WASP from the rest is silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:honestly from a pure prestige perspective - and I have no dog in this fight - the only two that are stand outs are Amherst and Williams. Every other SLAC is just one of the bunch
Would add Harvey Mudd for STEM.
Anonymous wrote:for me Williams and Pomona are tops. Amherst feels a little dusty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:honestly from a pure prestige perspective - and I have no dog in this fight - the only two that are stand outs are Amherst and Williams. Every other SLAC is just one of the bunch
Boom. There it is. Facts.
Anonymous wrote:honestly from a pure prestige perspective - and I have no dog in this fight - the only two that are stand outs are Amherst and Williams. Every other SLAC is just one of the bunch