Anonymous wrote:Original Poster here. Only those married or engaged got plus ones. She wanted to bring her tinderella.
Anonymous wrote:OP don't give in on the plus one. Your position is totally reasonable.
But don't un-invite. Un-inviting would be tacky and immature.
Anonymous wrote:You Urban Moms are witches (with a b) for saying this person is a bridezilla. You have someone come on your big day and dictate how everything goes. It’s not your wedding, no one cares what you think.
Anonymous wrote:Why is a male date being called a tinderella? Is this a lesbian bridesmaid? I can't figure out what op keeps using that word.
Anonymous wrote:It’s beyond tacky for you not to give a bridesmaid a +1, whether he’s a boyfriend, a husband, or even just a friend. You are tacky, tacky, tacky for not immediately and graciously giving a member of your wedding party a +1.
That’s all.
Anonymous wrote:You’re just rationalizing doing something rude. The fact that you can’t afford to extend plus ones to your wedding party, who are more than just guests, in no way means that it’s not rude not to do so. The fact that it’s not highly unusual for people with budgetary constraints to cut corners in this manner does not mean that it’s not a rude thing to do.
We actually have no budgetary constraints - at all. And our planner is aware of this fact. We DO have occupancy constraints imposed by the venue. We also have three twenty-something kids who, between them, attend at least a wedding a month and have been in many weddings, and universally they report that they are invited to bring a guest (DC who is engaged) and they are never invited to bring guests (DCs who don’t have SOs). One DC was in a wedding in Europe, and it never occurred to DC to even register that they were not invited to bring a guest because they were there with a bunch of college friends who - gasp! - also did not have guests. I am convinced that most of the people responding on this thread have not attended a wedding in 20 years and don’t have kids in that stage of life, because so many of these posts are completely out of touch with common practice. We are not unsophisticated or rude but know from our own experience what conventions apply today.
You’re just rationalizing doing something rude. The fact that you can’t afford to extend plus ones to your wedding party, who are more than just guests, in no way means that it’s not rude not to do so. The fact that it’s not highly unusual for people with budgetary constraints to cut corners in this manner does not mean that it’s not a rude thing to do.
Anonymous wrote:Long story short, a wedding party guest has essentially gone silent and then called last night throwing a tantrum yelling at us that we are not allowing her to bring a plus one. It's our day, not hers, especially with someone she says she is thinking of breaking up with. We are un-inviting this person. Wrong thing to do? Wedding is 3 weeks out, this is also a bridesmaid.
Anonymous wrote:wrong. you and pp are incredibly rude.
Hard disagree. It is absolutely acceptable to include plus ones only for guests in long-term relationships. We are working with a very high- end wedding planner in DC right now who said this is not at all unusual. When you are hosting a wedding with limited space and/or that is “luxury” many of you will rethink this.
Anonymous wrote:It’s beyond tacky for you not to give a bridesmaid a +1, whether he’s a boyfriend, a husband, or even just a friend. You are tacky, tacky, tacky for not immediately and graciously giving a member of your wedding party a +1.
That’s all.
Anonymous wrote:wrong. you and pp are incredibly rude.
Hard disagree. It is absolutely acceptable to include plus ones only for guests in long-term relationships. We are working with a very high- end wedding planner in DC right now who said this is not at all unusual. When you are hosting a wedding with limited space and/or that is “luxury” many of you will rethink this.