Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP: thanks for very helpful suggestions so far. Question:
Are Swarthmore, Carnegie Mellon, Pomona, Rice and Harvey Mudd where-fun-goes-to-die schools? Those seem to be the level of “reachiness” DD wants to aim for. She wants high rigor (truly happy when around nerdy smart kids who like to talk science) but we hope she doesn’t jump right from an intense HS to another 4 years of intensity.
Rice is hard. Kids there are absolutely hard workers. But the professors are extremely helpful, and the students are very collaborative rather than competitive.
40%+ Asian at Rice. So, I know someone would call it a place with lots of bots. The truth is. It’s a nice place.
Anonymous wrote:OP: thanks for very helpful suggestions so far. Question:
Are Swarthmore, Carnegie Mellon, Pomona, Rice and Harvey Mudd where-fun-goes-to-die schools? Those seem to be the level of “reachiness” DD wants to aim for. She wants high rigor (truly happy when around nerdy smart kids who like to talk science) but we hope she doesn’t jump right from an intense HS to another 4 years of intensity.
Anonymous wrote:OP: thanks for very helpful suggestions so far. Question:
Are Swarthmore, Carnegie Mellon, Pomona, Rice and Harvey Mudd where-fun-goes-to-die schools? Those seem to be the level of “reachiness” DD wants to aim for. She wants high rigor (truly happy when around nerdy smart kids who like to talk science) but we hope she doesn’t jump right from an intense HS to another 4 years of intensity.
Anonymous wrote:OP: thanks for very helpful suggestions so far. Question:
Are Swarthmore, Carnegie Mellon, Pomona, Rice and Harvey Mudd where-fun-goes-to-die schools? Those seem to be the level of “reachiness” DD wants to aim for. She wants high rigor (truly happy when around nerdy smart kids who like to talk science) but we hope she doesn’t jump right from an intense HS to another 4 years of intensity.
Swat, yes. CMU, kinda. The other three, no.Anonymous wrote:OP: thanks for very helpful suggestions so far. Question:
Are Swarthmore, Carnegie Mellon, Pomona, Rice and Harvey Mudd where-fun-goes-to-die schools? Those seem to be the level of “reachiness” DD wants to aim for. She wants high rigor (truly happy when around nerdy smart kids who like to talk science) but we hope she doesn’t jump right from an intense HS to another 4 years of intensity.
Anonymous wrote:- Ideal small to medium-sized interdisciplinary college in a city or suburb
- chemistry major, also wants to take classes in AI and applied math
- wants high exposure to professors and research opportunities
- has strived in high rigor environment but doesn’t want the kind of place where fun goes to die or everyone is studying for grades
- collaborative, highly intellectual culture where students love learning, not all about jockeying for IB connections or the next IPO opportunity
- Female, unhooked, non URM, from a top private, full pay, quiet nerdy but has lot of friends
- 1580, 3.88 from a school that’s known for rigor/doesn't grade inflate (no one gets a 4.0), decent ECs (STEM leadership, part time job year round, volunteer year round, some regional math and writing awards)
Anonymous wrote:DP here. Why stay away from Duke?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reaches: Brown, Yale, Harvey Mudd, Stanford (stay away from Cornell, Dartmouth, Penn, Harvard, Duke).
Targets: Hamilton, Haverford, Middlebury, Bowdoin, Bates, Davidson, Wake, W&M
Safeties: Beloit, St. Olaf, Denison, Kenyon, Colby
(Given stats and a small elite private school, these targets are different than what many would suggest for a public school student).
Colby is not a safety, and it’s in the middle of nowhere.
Colby is 100% a safety for this kid from a strong private. They will take down to a 3.4 or so from ours. My kid was one of them this year.
Colby takes the lower 1/3 of our private too.
And almost no one from our W public. Ditto Middlebury.