Anonymous wrote:Trumps DEI hires are killing America.

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/trump-unqualified-hires-america-vulnerable-intelligence-community-gabbard-patel-bongino-noem-gorka

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ Companies can even do that with new hires - something like a basic competency exam, like the ACT/ SAT.

Oh goody another opportunity for the rich to prep the hell out of their kids and out compete anyone without those kind of resources.

There will always be that, but test prep is available online. Most don't have access to the wealth to prep the hell out of anybody but most do have online access.

People that can be trained to do well on standardized tests could be useful hires for some jobs. There may be some jobs that require other skills.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Military recruiting is doing much better. The military was devoting a significant amount of time & money on all sorts of woke crap, which was time & money not being devoted to mission-related things.

The touchy-feely people who fall for DEI-related nonsense aren’t likely to join the military in the first place, so it was a bad fit.

Military recruiting is doing better because young people can’t find jobs anywhere else.

+1. Destroy the economy. Destroy higher education. Folks have to turn to jobs in the military or head down to the swamps in Florida and work as ice agents. Thanks Maga, such wonderful opportunities.

Anonymous wrote:Military recruiting is doing much better. The military was devoting a significant amount of time & money on all sorts of woke crap, which was time & money not being devoted to mission-related things.

The touchy-feely people who fall for DEI-related nonsense aren’t likely to join the military in the first place, so it was a bad fit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this is just a question of perspective. For the brief year or two when DEI was everything, if you were white or Asian or Hispanic, especially a male, it seemed like every job or promotion in Fortune 500 companies or government was fixated on black folks, who were often unqualified or mediocre. So that led to some resentment. Because it wasn't about talent, but only race. Which I get from the black perspective. It's like, duh, welcome to the last 450 years. But it is 2025, and the sense is merit is a better way to do things than race-based hiring preferences.

And people go primal when it comes to livelihoods and their ability to feed their families. So I'm not surprised there was a huge shift among white, asian, and Hispanic men toward Republicans in the last election. Democrats aren't their party. Race-based hiring was garbage in 1825,1925, and 2025. So people will gravitate to organizations and companies that value talent, regardless of racial or ethnic background. And there are tons of great black professionals. But when people get prioritized for things they can't do anything about - race, gender, ethnicity - there's going to be a reaction among the unchosen people.

This is absolutely not true. What makes you think the black people were unqualified? Just because they were black? Most of the black people I work with can run circles around the white men. Do you know how many mediocre white and asian men I work with?

Here's a tip, scores and the "pedigree" of your college don't mean anything when it comes to getting the job done. I find that the better the school, the dumber the employee. NO common sense.

This is absolutely not true. What makes you think the black people were unqualified? Just because they were black? Most of the black people I work with can run circles around the white men. Do you know how many mediocre white and asian men I work with?

Here's a tip, scores and the "pedigree" of your college don't mean anything when it comes to getting the job done. I find that the better the school, the dumber the employee. NO common sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this is just a question of perspective. For the brief year or two when DEI was everything, if you were white or Asian or Hispanic, especially a male, it seemed like every job or promotion in Fortune 500 companies or government was fixated on black folks, who were often unqualified or mediocre. So that led to some resentment. Because it wasn't about talent, but only race. Which I get from the black perspective. It's like, duh, welcome to the last 450 years. But it is 2025, and the sense is merit is a better way to do things than race-based hiring preferences.

And people go primal when it comes to livelihoods and their ability to feed their families. So I'm not surprised there was a huge shift among white, asian, and Hispanic men toward Republicans in the last election. Democrats aren't their party. Race-based hiring was garbage in 1825,1925, and 2025. So people will gravitate to organizations and companies that value talent, regardless of racial or ethnic background. And there are tons of great black professionals. But when people get prioritized for things they can't do anything about - race, gender, ethnicity - there's going to be a reaction among the unchosen people.

Since when are Hispanics not considered minorities alongside black people? This post is a strange attempt at fitting in with a group that Hispanics have never been part of.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this is just a question of perspective. For the brief year or two when DEI was everything, if you were white or Asian or Hispanic, especially a male, it seemed like every job or promotion in Fortune 500 companies or government was fixated on black folks, who were often unqualified or mediocre. So that led to some resentment. Because it wasn't about talent, but only race. Which I get from the black perspective. It's like, duh, welcome to the last 450 years. But it is 2025, and the sense is merit is a better way to do things than race-based hiring preferences.

And people go primal when it comes to livelihoods and their ability to feed their families. So I'm not surprised there was a huge shift among white, asian, and Hispanic men toward Republicans in the last election. Democrats aren't their party. Race-based hiring was garbage in 1825,1925, and 2025. So people will gravitate to organizations and companies that value talent, regardless of racial or ethnic background. And there are tons of great black professionals. But when people get prioritized for things they can't do anything about - race, gender, ethnicity - there's going to be a reaction among the unchosen people.

This is absolutely not true. What makes you think the black people were unqualified? Just because they were black? Most of the black people I work with can run circles around the white men. Do you know how many mediocre white and asian men I work with?

Here's a tip, scores and the "pedigree" of your college don't mean anything when it comes to getting the job done. I find that the better the school, the dumber the employee. NO common sense.

Anonymous wrote:I think this is just a question of perspective. For the brief year or two when DEI was everything, if you were white or Asian or Hispanic, especially a male, it seemed like every job or promotion in Fortune 500 companies or government was fixated on black folks, who were often unqualified or mediocre. So that led to some resentment. Because it wasn't about talent, but only race. Which I get from the black perspective. It's like, duh, welcome to the last 450 years. But it is 2025, and the sense is merit is a better way to do things than race-based hiring preferences.

And people go primal when it comes to livelihoods and their ability to feed their families. So I'm not surprised there was a huge shift among white, asian, and Hispanic men toward Republicans in the last election. Democrats aren't their party. Race-based hiring was garbage in 1825,1925, and 2025. So people will gravitate to organizations and companies that value talent, regardless of racial or ethnic background. And there are tons of great black professionals. But when people get prioritized for things they can't do anything about - race, gender, ethnicity - there's going to be a reaction among the unchosen people.

This is absolutely not true. What makes you think the black people were unqualified? Just because they were black? Most of the black people I work with can run circles around the white men. Do you know how many mediocre white and asian men I work with?

Here's a tip, scores and the "pedigree" of your college don't mean anything when it comes to getting the job done. I find that the better the school, the dumber the employee. NO common sense.

Anonymous wrote:NP. In my deep blue school district, advanced classes are coming back after being removed for “equity.” Solid win IMO.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not MAGA, but I love it because when I get my next promotion people will know it’s because I earned it and not because of my skin color.

LOL you’re definitely not getting a promotion.

Okay, I say that with a caveat, if you’re a gun-toting MAGA bootlicker like Winsome Sears, and there’s room for one more token POC then the job is yours.

Quiet part out loud.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Military recruiting is doing much better. The military was devoting a significant amount of time & money on all sorts of woke crap, which was time & money not being devoted to mission-related things.

The touchy-feely people who fall for DEI-related nonsense aren’t likely to join the military in the first place, so it was a bad fit.

Military recruiting is doing better because young people can’t find jobs anywhere else.

+1. Destroy the economy. Destroy higher education. Folks have to turn to jobs in the military or head down to the swamps in Florida and work as ice agents. Thanks Maga, such wonderful opportunities.

What’s wrong with working for ICE? All they are doing is enforcing our democratically-passed laws.

What's wrong with going to college and getting a good education and starting your own business and employing people in the economy instead of sucking off the government teat for your job?

Not everyone wants to go around dressed like a masked thug and harassing soccer moms and incarcerating them in a swamp in Florida to earn money. Just because you would enjoy that doesn't mean it's for most people.

Wow. Way to insult the entire federal workforce.

You are a real nut-job.

I worked as a contractor for a dozen years and saw the results of fed.gov

Basically nothing gets done and the private sector can do what the federal workforce is trying to do in a fraction of time. It's just a bunch of gatekeepers and bureaucracies that fight each other for turf and a steady pay check. It's a constant clusterf.

If you actually think that you don’t have anywhere near the knowledge of federal work that you think you do.

Look, not everyone is going to make it through the hiring process, you don’t have to be bitter about it. Mostly the contractors get treated well even if most of them don’t know their head from their rear.

Anonymous wrote:I think this is just a question of perspective. For the brief year or two when DEI was everything, if you were white or Asian or Hispanic, especially a male, it seemed like every job or promotion in Fortune 500 companies or government was fixated on black folks, who were often unqualified or mediocre. So that led to some resentment. Because it wasn't about talent, but only race. Which I get from the black perspective. It's like, duh, welcome to the last 450 years. But it is 2025, and the sense is merit is a better way to do things than race-based hiring preferences.

And people go primal when it comes to livelihoods and their ability to feed their families. So I'm not surprised there was a huge shift among white, asian, and Hispanic men toward Republicans in the last election. Democrats aren't their party. Race-based hiring was garbage in 1825,1925, and 2025. So people will gravitate to organizations and companies that value talent, regardless of racial or ethnic background. And there are tons of great black professionals. But when people get prioritized for things they can't do anything about - race, gender, ethnicity - there's going to be a reaction among the unchosen people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not MAGA, but I love it because when I get my next promotion people will know it’s because I earned it and not because of my skin color.

LOL you’re definitely not getting a promotion.

Okay, I say that with a caveat, if you’re a gun-toting MAGA bootlicker like Winsome Sears, and there’s room for one more token POC then the job is yours.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not MAGA, but I love it because when I get my next promotion people will know it’s because I earned it and not because of my skin color.

LOL you’re definitely not getting a promotion.