Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Commamders thought they were playoff bound based off last years achievment but that scrimmage vs Patriots is predicting different outcome.

That’s a cowboy fan thing to say. I’m going to take a guess and say you’re probably an Arlington dad as well.

Anonymous wrote:The Commamders thought they were playoff bound based off last years achievment but that scrimmage vs Patriots is predicting different outcome.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All I know is vda lost good players to union, and replaced them. but it doesn't really matter because neither teams are going to nationals🤣👌

Kinda energy

Anonymous wrote:All I know is vda lost good players to union, and replaced them. but it doesn't really matter because neither teams are going to nationals🤣👌

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All I know is vda lost good players to union, and replaced them. but it doesn't really matter because neither teams are going to nationals🤣👌

Agreed anyone who thinks vda is making it might be a bigger joke then there team and coach.. and don't even get me started on how Arlington coach is also a joke.😹

How would you rank the area coaches then? Given girls are older it seems tactics start to play a vital role. The better athletes don’t jus carry the day.

As girls get older tactics matter less if we are talking ECNL. What matters most at those ages is college recruiting. I don’t like it but it’s a fact of how it works today. The best coaches are the ones who best position players for college. Winning is less important than getting good highlight reels, establishing relationships, getting more playing time (at the expense of your teammates). Hate the game not the player.

1000% THIS. This is why the thread wasn’t titled “which 2009 teams are qualifying this year?” Because those parents know that individual play and effort is so much more important for college soccer recruitment. The 2011 girl parents have always been wild and completely uniformed about youth soccer.

I'm a 2011 parent, and I'm already there. This is rapidly coming to an end, and team wins are transient. I just want to see my kid make plays. Nobody truly GAF who the best 2011 local ECNL team is. The clock is running out on that (maybe it's already run out).

Arlington is the best. VDA is the second best. NVA was third but now that’s FVU. No debate here. How’s syc looking? Maybe they’re a dark horse to take the crown?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are girl parents right? That’s insane the obsession with team performance. Probably the most disturbing thing about this forum - the analyses and criticism of girls teams and the girls that play on them. So incredibly toxic and just awful parenting.

they just say the quiet sideline conversations out loud here. Ill allow it. Its a good balance to the instagram/ X hype monsters.

Uh, appalled by these threads and the Insta parents. Aren’t they one and the same?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are girl parents right? That’s insane the obsession with team performance. Probably the most disturbing thing about this forum - the analyses and criticism of girls teams and the girls that play on them. So incredibly toxic and just awful parenting.

they just say the quiet sideline conversations out loud here. Ill allow it. Its a good balance to the instagram/ X hype monsters.

Sick parents (mentally) who put their kids in this mess and live through them?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All I know is vda lost good players to union, and replaced them. but it doesn't really matter because neither teams are going to nationals🤣👌

Agreed anyone who thinks vda is making it might be a bigger joke then there team and coach.. and don't even get me started on how Arlington coach is also a joke.😹

How would you rank the area coaches then? Given girls are older it seems tactics start to play a vital role. The better athletes don’t jus carry the day.

As girls get older tactics matter less if we are talking ECNL. What matters most at those ages is college recruiting. I don’t like it but it’s a fact of how it works today. The best coaches are the ones who best position players for college. Winning is less important than getting good highlight reels, establishing relationships, getting more playing time (at the expense of your teammates). Hate the game not the player.

1000% THIS. This is why the thread wasn’t titled “which 2009 teams are qualifying this year?” Because those parents know that individual play and effort is so much more important for college soccer recruitment. The 2011 girl parents have always been wild and completely uniformed about youth soccer.

I'm a 2011 parent, and I'm already there. This is rapidly coming to an end, and team wins are transient. I just want to see my kid make plays. Nobody truly GAF who the best 2011 local ECNL team is. The clock is running out on that (maybe it's already run out).

the club resets didn’t help for sure. Limited visibility options just became even more scarce outside of one particular age group at one club who i wont mention because they seem butt hurt ATM. Doesn’t help that they unfortunately get washed in the postseason as they are a talented group and represent what the region has to offer. Really makes me wonder what they heck surf and other cali clubs are doing to get those consistent wins. Surf won on the boys and girls side of the house… is it coaching? A play approach ?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we seriously considering fvu in the top three I can count the amount of "good players" they have on one hand..

Ouch. That was unnecessary.

very much so… considering they picked up vda and nvas top scorers last season. Even if politics kept those girls from getting call ups… you cant fake stats (looks at compromised coaches sternly). Glad i came in this toxic thread to spread more Lol. FVU losing to their goalie WILL hurt. But the new pick ups gave your new and old clubs headaches. If the coach can get things in order… which is a big IF they may be the dark horse and playoff buster here.

Sniffing post season however. That is reserved for ARL and Arl only.

VDA’s top scorer is at Union?

ignoring the trapped phenom yes.. back probably still sore from carrying last season and previous season to post season . Y hate? Some talented players exited. Nothing wrong with admitting it.

Too much sipping from the toxic chardonnay

I think those players were told to exit? You parents can tell whatever story you want though. FVU taking the natty!

the sarcasm is way tooo thick here. Nattys is a REDICULOUS hot take. You guys are hilarious And i would question the intelligence of the coach/staff if a consistently high performance players were Told to leave. Considering previous season addition up top and current come from GA players from local clubs (tsj??? Really?) and now obviously FVU… which we know was mid last season and lower than NVA and some other clubs. Last year’s records are probably not posted on instagram but Pepperidge farm remembers. Going to need a lot more than that to knock off Arl. Especially now that defense is shored up even more. Kinda makes it more difficult to score if you know what I mean.

I question your intelligence. You can’t spell “ridiculous” and you even have spell check. Your new sideline (inside the beltway) isn’t going to tolerate your ratchet behavior.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are girl parents right? That’s insane the obsession with team performance. Probably the most disturbing thing about this forum - the analyses and criticism of girls teams and the girls that play on them. So incredibly toxic and just awful parenting.

they just say the quiet sideline conversations out loud here. Ill allow it. Its a good balance to the instagram/ X hype monsters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are girl parents right? That’s insane the obsession with team performance. Probably the most disturbing thing about this forum - the analyses and criticism of girls teams and the girls that play on them. So incredibly toxic and just awful parenting.

they just say the quiet sideline conversations out loud here. Ill allow it. Its a good balance to the instagram/ X hype monsters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All I know is vda lost good players to union, and replaced them. but it doesn't really matter because neither teams are going to nationals🤣👌

Agreed anyone who thinks vda is making it might be a bigger joke then there team and coach.. and don't even get me started on how Arlington coach is also a joke.😹

How would you rank the area coaches then? Given girls are older it seems tactics start to play a vital role. The better athletes don’t jus carry the day.

As girls get older tactics matter less if we are talking ECNL. What matters most at those ages is college recruiting. I don’t like it but it’s a fact of how it works today. The best coaches are the ones who best position players for college. Winning is less important than getting good highlight reels, establishing relationships, getting more playing time (at the expense of your teammates). Hate the game not the player.

1000% THIS. This is why the thread wasn’t titled “which 2009 teams are qualifying this year?” Because those parents know that individual play and effort is so much more important for college soccer recruitment. The 2011 girl parents have always been wild and completely uniformed about youth soccer.

I'm a 2011 parent, and I'm already there. This is rapidly coming to an end, and team wins are transient. I just want to see my kid make plays. Nobody truly GAF who the best 2011 local ECNL team is. The clock is running out on that (maybe it's already run out).