Anonymous wrote:I realize it is a made up category, but at the same time, it’s just a shorthand for a quality signifier! So why does Northwestern not make that “Ivy Plus” cut, in spite of its current ranking at #6?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I realize it is a made up category, but at the same time, it’s just a shorthand for a quality signifier! So why does Northwestern not make that “Ivy Plus” cut, in spite of its current ranking at #6?
USnews is compromised and its rating system is suspect .
Follow QS ranking for more accurate rankings..
https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings
Anonymous wrote:I realize it is a made up category, but at the same time, it’s just a shorthand for a quality signifier! So why does Northwestern not make that “Ivy Plus” cut, in spite of its current ranking at #6?
Anonymous wrote:I realize it is a made up category, but at the same time, it’s just a shorthand for a quality signifier! So why does Northwestern not make that “Ivy Plus” cut, in spite of its current ranking at #6?
Anonymous wrote:There is such a DMV bias here. If Hopkins is top 15, it is 15. It is a great school. I am not hating on it. But it is not on par with the others. And Northwestern is a slight notch down as well (on par with Hopkins).
Again, not insulting either. Being 14 and 15 is truly incredible.
And Ivies will always be Ivies. It is a cottage industry here to insult the non-HYP ivies. Guess what - they will always be incredibly desirable. They will always lose plenty of kids to other schools. But they will always be at or near the top.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w31492/w31492.pdf
In a paper on college admissions, Harvard professors define Ivy-Plus college as Ivy League, Stanford, MIT, Duke, and Chicago. They say that Ivy-Plus colleges are distinctive in this respect: a far smaller share of individuals in these leadership positions attended other highly selective colleges (e.g., public state flagship universities or other highly-ranked private colleges) despite the fact that those institutions enroll many more students.
Anonymous wrote:Too good at sports. And that is not me being clever.