Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.
"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.
"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Are you actually stupid enough to believe these donors aren’t getting paid back and then some with special favors?
Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.
"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Anonymous wrote:Such a lovely addition to the White House, and a great way for the Best President in American History to cement his legacy as a hero to the American People.
His taste is fantastic, I love all of the well thought out, classy touches, and the fact it exudes power.
Anonymous wrote:Such a lovely addition to the White House, and a great way for the Best President in American History to cement his legacy as a hero to the American People.
His taste is fantastic, I love all of the well thought out, classy touches, and the fact it exudes power.
Much larger capacity than the current hosting room.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have to go back more than 60 years for precedent, you are losing the argument.
Also, if you cannot tell the difference between a first lady beautification initiative and Trump's ego, I don't know what to tell you.
Ah, so you're incensed because you think this kind of thing is... a woman's job? Specifically, the First Lady? Get over yourself. This is being paid for entirely with private funds and will benefit all future administrations.
As a taxpayer, I’m not getting the “benefit” here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have to go back more than 60 years for precedent, you are losing the argument.
Also, if you cannot tell the difference between a first lady beautification initiative and Trump's ego, I don't know what to tell you.
Ah, so you're incensed because you think this kind of thing is... a woman's job? Specifically, the First Lady? Get over yourself. This is being paid for entirely with private funds and will benefit all future administrations.
Anonymous wrote:Trump had the famed Rose Garden ripped up for this concrete monstrosity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have to go back more than 60 years for precedent, you are losing the argument.
Also, if you cannot tell the difference between a first lady beautification initiative and Trump's ego, I don't know what to tell you.
Ah, so you're incensed because you think this kind of thing is... a woman's job? Specifically, the First Lady? Get over yourself. This is being paid for entirely with private funds and will benefit all future administrations.
Anonymous wrote:The ballroom is evidence America has eclipsed France culturally, even in cuisine, because France does not have BBQ. I would say America has entered a new Gilded Age, eclipsing all of Europe which stands like a waif in our shadow.
A massive BBQ smoker grill should be installed and then there would be some real parties going on in there.