Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Kamala stands an ice cubes chance in hell in the general election. However, if she runs, she will definitely get the backing of the DNC and most of the democratic base.

She may get the backing of the DNC, bc the DNC is staffed by idiots. But she will not get the base. Her time is done. I just watched her on Colbert. She has the charm and charisma of a gnat. Not happening.

Now if AOC were to run, she’d immediately start out as the front runner. As Hillary Clinton learned, the Sanders wing of the party is strong. In retrospect, it was a mistake for the Democratic establishment to antagonize economic populists.

Progressives ultimately went off the rails with their social crap, but the Sanders focus on working and middle class Americans is very much a winning message. And AOC is very good at plugging into that energy. On Day 1 of the next campaign, she’d have a comfortable lead over any of the other names tossed around. She has her weaknesses, but she gets the base at the outset if she decides to run. If Sanders were twenty years younger, it’d be his party going forward.

Agreed, with highlighted emphasis.

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Kamala stands an ice cubes chance in hell in the general election. However, if she runs, she will definitely get the backing of the DNC and most of the democratic base.

She may get the backing of the DNC, bc the DNC is staffed by idiots. But she will not get the base. Her time is done. I just watched her on Colbert. She has the charm and charisma of a gnat. Not happening.

Now if AOC were to run, she’d immediately start out as the front runner. As Hillary Clinton learned, the Sanders wing of the party is strong. In retrospect, it was a mistake for the Democratic establishment to antagonize economic populists.

Progressives ultimately went off the rails with their social crap, but the Sanders focus on working and middle class Americans is very much a winning message. And AOC is very good at plugging into that energy. On Day 1 of the next campaign, she’d have a comfortable lead over any of the other names tossed around. She has her weaknesses, but she gets the base at the outset if she decides to run. If Sanders were twenty years younger, it’d be his party going forward.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Kamala stands an ice cubes chance in hell in the general election. However, if she runs, she will definitely get the backing of the DNC and most of the democratic base.

Had Harris not accepted the VP offer from Biden, she may have stood a chance of a advancing her career in national politics but now her career is over just like Pence, Vance, and Mondale's careers are/were over when their VPs term ends or ended.. Voters have the same feelings towards VPs of very unpopular presidents as they do the very unpopular presidents.

DP. I dont know. There is “precedent”, and everything we know based on what may no longer be applicable history in the making post-Trump. Instead of being so disoriented from Trump’s chaos, look at it as an opportunity to shake some things up. Ride the wave of change while the tide is high, dont be taken out by it.

There is very recent precedent for what happens to any poor souls who are associated with wildly unpopular and unfit presidents and there is no reason to believe the same thing that happened in 2020 & 2024 won't happen again in 2028.

^^which may no longer be applicable *given* history in the making we are experiencing during the Trump Era

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Kamala stands an ice cubes chance in hell in the general election. However, if she runs, she will definitely get the backing of the DNC and most of the democratic base.

Had Harris not accepted the VP offer from Biden, she may have stood a chance of a advancing her career in national politics but now her career is over just like Pence, Vance, and Mondale's careers are/were over when their VPs term ends or ended.. Voters have the same feelings towards VPs of very unpopular presidents as they do the very unpopular presidents.

DP. I dont know. There is “precedent”, and everything we know based on what may no longer be applicable history in the making post-Trump. Instead of being so disoriented from Trump’s chaos, look at it as an opportunity to shake some things up. Ride the wave of change while the tide is high, dont be taken out by it.

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Kamala stands an ice cubes chance in hell in the general election. However, if she runs, she will definitely get the backing of the DNC and most of the democratic base.

Had Harris not accepted the VP offer from Biden, she may have stood a chance of a advancing her career in national politics but now her career is over just like Pence, Vance, and Mondale's careers are/were over when their VPs term ends or ended.. Voters have the same feelings towards VPs of very unpopular presidents as they do the very unpopular presidents.

Trump is an absolute disaster. Total disaster. And anyone that isn’t lying to themselves or others knows that our country would not be in this disaster if Kamala was president. I know people are angry about all kinds of things and needed someone to blame, but unforgivable to vote in a narcissist who ran for president only to stay out of jail. And of course enrich himself.

Prices are not down on anything, except maybe gas and we know what that means

Less jobs.

Unemployment is up.

The tariff game is adding all kinds of uncertainty.

The society Trump is trying to build is for the uber rich and no one else.

Unforgivable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Kamala stands an ice cubes chance in hell in the general election. However, if she runs, she will definitely get the backing of the DNC and most of the democratic base.

And most importantly, AIPAC.
The DNC is controlled by Zionists.

The money controlling GOP and Dem politicians is coming from a lot more sources than just AIPAC, dimwit. AIPAC is a few drops in a very full bucket of problems we have with our awful two major political parties. Wake up!

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Kamala stands an ice cubes chance in hell in the general election. However, if she runs, she will definitely get the backing of the DNC and most of the democratic base.

And most importantly, AIPAC.
The DNC is controlled by Zionists.

Not most of the Democratic base

I don't think Kamala stands an ice cubes chance in hell in the general election. However, if she runs, she will definitely get the backing of the DNC and most of the democratic base.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She received $1B dollars from the public and she lost ALL 7 swing states v a guy who is one of the weakest career politicians ever.

I'm really confused by how anybody could consider her a strong candidate for any political office moving forward?

I mean there are no words to excuse her mess. No excuses. SEVEN SWING STATES. SEVEN. I actually think anyone with 1/2 a brain who had been in the gang as long as she has could have at least won just 1 with that war chest. WTF?

To your point, that doesn’t seem suspicious to you at all? Like the other candidate cheated?

This. Trump cheated in 2016 and it worked. He cheated in 2020 but it wasn’t enough. So in 2024, he overplayed his hand and “won” every swing state. Which should be a major red flag to anyone who has half a brain cell.

Anyone who thinks it is unrealistic, I implore you to look at the big picture for a change. Trump literally cannot do anything at all without cheating and breaking rules, so why would this be any different? Look at his connections to voting machines and the way he pandered to the big tech guys. Read between the lines of so many comments he and Musk made. Look at all the data and polls that turned out to be massively “wrong” - even the ones that have always been reliable. Listen to people who are saying their vote was changed or not counted. Look at her crowd sizes compared to his. I could go on and on. My word. If you can open your mind long enough to step back and look at the WHOLE THING, there is absolutely no way you won’t see it. The election was stolen. He is barely even trying to hide that fact and is borderline bragging about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/kamalaharris.com/post/3lv7csevhp22j

Kamala just posted this message. She is not running for governor of California. She did not rule out a presidential run. Reading between the lines, it does not sound to me like she will run. But most people in comments seem to think otherwise.

Unpopular opinion here, but I thought she was a great candidate, considering the circumstances. Trump already told us he cheated, but even if he didn’t, she only lost by 1.5 percentage points. After a whirlwind 100 day campaign and people pissed off from the get-go that she wasn’t primaried and refused to vote for her for that reason - which is no fault of her own. Sitting VPs historically do not have successful presidential campaigns.

Anyway, I would like to see what she is capable of as a candidate with a full campaign. She is, perhaps, the most qualified person in history to run for president.

She is, but some people can’t be led by a black woman because it hurts their feelings. We saw the snowflakes melting when Obama was president, and he’s a man! However, she should run if she wants and if she isn’t pulling it off then the other candidates will be better for having run against her.

Is that why she didn't win the Democrat primary? I mean which Republican is going to vote for her on her policy position. I can't get past that. Seriously, so yeah. If you think there are people that otherwise agree with her policy position that won't vote for her because she is a black woman. That I think is a Democrat/left leaning problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14, black leaders are no more special than leaders of any other color. Wake up, my friend.

Thats fine. Then don’t except show up and vote D. There was leakage in the last election.

Whatever. People will vote for the candidate they feel is best. Most of us don't vote based on the color of someone's skin.
DP

Oh I think you do…

Anonymous wrote:She received $1B dollars from the public and she lost ALL 7 swing states v a guy who is one of the weakest career politicians ever.

I'm really confused by how anybody could consider her a strong candidate for any political office moving forward?

I mean there are no words to excuse her mess. No excuses. SEVEN SWING STATES. SEVEN. I actually think anyone with 1/2 a brain who had been in the gang as long as she has could have at least won just 1 with that war chest. WTF?

To your point, that doesn’t seem suspicious to you at all? Like the other candidate cheated?