Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Other pilot was lying clearly

Or he wasn't because there was a defect.

A defect that would shut off both switches at the exact same time? Not likely.

They were shut off one after another with a time gap of 0.1 seconds, not simultaneously.

Still, my point stands.

Sorry to be unclear. I was agreeing with you. The evidence points to an intentional manual action. Not a defect in hardware or software.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Other pilot was lying clearly

Or he wasn't because there was a defect.

A defect that would shut off both switches at the exact same time? Not likely.

They were shut off one after another with a time gap of 0.1 seconds, not simultaneously.

Still, my point stands.

I was transfixed for weeks by the story of the Germanwings copilot who locked the captain out of the cockpit and flew the full aircraft into the side of a mountain in the French alps.

So sad to see another pilot has done a mass murder - suicide.

I do not understand the cruelty of suicidal pilots. There was a recent article (the Atlantic maybe?) about the Air Malaysia plane that went missing some years ago with over 200 people on board. Bits of debris washed up around Southeast Asia but never found the black box or crash site. The theory in the article was that the pilot was actually suicidal. It is one thing to kill oneself, another to take 200 others with you. Worse than a mass shooter.

Anonymous wrote:So we're thinking suicidal pilot? Was there anyone on board whom anyone would have wanted dead and with enough leverage to persuade a pilot to crash the plane?

They are probably doing deep background checks for everyone on the plane, especially the two pilots.

So we're thinking suicidal pilot? Was there anyone on board whom anyone would have wanted dead and with enough leverage to persuade a pilot to crash the plane?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Other pilot was lying clearly

Or he wasn't because there was a defect.

A defect that would shut off both switches at the exact same time? Not likely.

They were shut off one after another with a time gap of 0.1 seconds, not simultaneously.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Other pilot was lying clearly

Or he wasn't because there was a defect.

A defect that would shut off both switches at the exact same time? Not likely.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Were the switches flipped to Off before or after takeoff?

Would a plane be able to take off with the switches off? It seems unlikely.

Not just unlikely. Physically impossible to spin the engines without fuel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Were the switches flipped to Off before or after takeoff?

After takeoff.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Were the switches flipped to Off before or after takeoff?

Would a plane be able to take off with the switches off? It seems unlikely.

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Were the switches flipped to Off before or after takeoff?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Other pilot was lying clearly

Or he wasn't because there was a defect.

No defect. The report specifically notes that.

It was intentional. And the other pilot knew, as soon as it happened but too late to do anything before the crash.

Where does it note that there was not a defect that caused the switches to turn off simultaneously?

It's the same design used on all Boeing aircraft?

Anonymous wrote:Let’s hear from everyone who was blaming Boeing the day after this happened.

Nothing to say now?


Pathetic losers.

And what will you say when the second 787 goes down the same way?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The preliminary report is out. The plane took off, the two engine fuel cutoff switches were flipped to off. One pilot asked, Why did you shut off the engines? The other said, I didn't. Then the plane crashed.

The report states that it makes no recommendations about Boeing or the engines. That is, they were not the reason the plane crashed.

It was released at 1:30 am Friday Saturday morning and the server crashed.

Other pilot was lying clearly

Or he wasn't because there was a defect.

No defect. The report specifically notes that.

It was intentional. And the other pilot knew, as soon as it happened but too late to do anything before the crash.

Where does it note that there was not a defect that caused the switches to turn off simultaneously?