Anonymous
05/21/2025 07:31
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pete’s problem is that he didn’t do anything while in Sec of Trans. So much is coming out about how things have been deteriorating for years. Clearly these are things he could have gotten started on and apparently he didn’t and perhaps made worse. His connecting to the failed Biden admin is a problem. And for those who want to say the Biden admin was a great success, just stop. Those of us in government know how rudderless it was for 4 years. I am 25 year fed and there was never a time when so little was done and so little was even attempted. And it wasn’t Covid for all 4 years. No one was running anything.
Pete increased the number of air traffic controllers hired for the first time in many years, and he kept the skies safe. He proposed more funding for the software but it was voted down in Congress.
This and MAGA knows it!! All MAGA has to argue with is FOX talking points. I love when people try to throw in covid to everything. Guess what Trump was president when covid hit and he botched Covid-he made and left a mess that Biden then cleaned up and I don't care that the DP is a "fed". Everyone here is a "fed"
Anonymous
05/21/2025 00:49
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
I’m not going to contribute financially to this party if anyone is a war mongerer.
Anonymous
05/20/2025 20:38
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:They should be doing their own version of Contract With America in which they clearly spell out what they are for and hope to do with a majority in Congress.
Stopping the Trump agenda could be item 10 but the first 9 items should spell out what they want to do to make America better.
They would still need to show some intentions. As far as I am concerned the reneged on their contract last time. They said they were going to solve all of these class issues wealth inequality, but then they spent a better part of four years trying to get amnesty in a reconciliation package. Are they going to do a 180 on sanctuary city nonsense any time soon? I liked the busing of migrants to blue states. GOP et al showed they meant business.
Got any plans to solve the class stratification issue. Let's see something.
Watch 'a Got?
Anonymous
05/20/2025 20:25
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:They should be doing their own version of Contract With America in which they clearly spell out what they are for and hope to do with a majority in Congress.
Stopping the Trump agenda could be item 10 but the first 9 items should spell out what they want to do to make America better.
This is good. One step is here already:
Anonymous
05/19/2025 17:18
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should *not* be putting all their effort behind Buttigieg. The US wouldn't elect 2 high capable women - there's NO way they'll elect a gay guy.
I really like Buttigieg. I think he's be an amazing president, but we aren't there yet as a nation.
The future is Osoff. Perhaps with a Whitmer VP. Maybe, just maybe, if we have another decade to pass, the US will be in a better place to elect a female president like Whitmer.
The future is also *not* the Dems playing nice and going high when they go low. The Dems need to learn to play just as dirty.
We also aren't there yet as a nation to be able to elect a Jewish president (I'm a Jew).
Democrats should play by the Republican playbook.
Don't support anything Republican. Insult them at all times. Run weird angering commercials and media spots sponsored by some odd sounding group.
Anonymous
05/19/2025 17:12
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should *not* be putting all their effort behind Buttigieg. The US wouldn't elect 2 high capable women - there's NO way they'll elect a gay guy.
I really like Buttigieg. I think he's be an amazing president, but we aren't there yet as a nation.
The future is Osoff. Perhaps with a Whitmer VP. Maybe, just maybe, if we have another decade to pass, the US will be in a better place to elect a female president like Whitmer.
The future is also *not* the Dems playing nice and going high when they go low. The Dems need to learn to play just as dirty.
We also aren't there yet as a nation to be able to elect a Jewish president (I'm a Jew).
I agree and I'm not a Jew but it boggles my mind that MAGAS worship an atheist who is an adjudicated rapist guilty of 34 felonies but are so racist, misogynistic, anti semitic they would never vote for a woman, Jew (or any religion other than Protestant). Quote honestly, it makes me sick that these people are allowed to contribute to the gene pool let alone allowed to vote!
Why does someone’s religion matter? Dems are stuck on identity politics. Didn’t learn their lesson from last November.
Actually, it was your people who, until Trump, always insisted that a President wear his faith on his sleeve and would say things like “I would never vote for an Atheist.” How they gave up that conviction for Trump,I will never ever understand.
Anonymous
05/19/2025 17:08
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
DAVE1980 wrote:Find a white/male (heterosexual) candidate who is a moderate; has an immigration/crime plan; willing to fight dirty; and someone to start campaigning ASAP. They should be holding rallies, vocal about Trumps nonsense, and very visible. Easy peasey. somehow they’ll screw it up.
This and they need to drop the trans stuff. Dems lost on the following issues just as much if not more than pocketbook issues: immigration, crime, trans, DEI.
Anonymous
05/19/2025 17:02
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should *not* be putting all their effort behind Buttigieg. The US wouldn't elect 2 high capable women - there's NO way they'll elect a gay guy.
I really like Buttigieg. I think he's be an amazing president, but we aren't there yet as a nation.
The future is Osoff. Perhaps with a Whitmer VP. Maybe, just maybe, if we have another decade to pass, the US will be in a better place to elect a female president like Whitmer.
The future is also *not* the Dems playing nice and going high when they go low. The Dems need to learn to play just as dirty.
We also aren't there yet as a nation to be able to elect a Jewish president (I'm a Jew).
I agree and I'm not a Jew but it boggles my mind that MAGAS worship an atheist who is an adjudicated rapist guilty of 34 felonies but are so racist, misogynistic, anti semitic they would never vote for a woman, Jew (or any religion other than Protestant). Quote honestly, it makes me sick that these people are allowed to contribute to the gene pool let alone allowed to vote!
Why does someone’s religion matter? Dems are stuck on identity politics. Didn’t learn their lesson from last November.
When you lose to an opponent as weak and awful as Trump in 2 of 3 POTUS elections, irrational thoughts enter the equation when trying to figure out what happened. Dems aren't "stuck" on anything and once the dust settles, Dems will no longer be in this phase of thinking a candidate must be of a certain religion, gender, or race in order to be viable. The fact is, Dems lost in 2024 due to the tribulations of a Christian white man and everyone will come to realize this obvious truth sooner than later.
Anonymous
05/19/2025 16:37
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:They should nominate AOC or Bernie Sanders to be their Presidential candidate. Operation: Let Them Talk
AOC and Bernie's political views are a form of populism that appeals to the common middle and lower middle class Americans. Taxing the rich, removing the influence of money from politics, and closing the wealth gap are very popular political concepts with the overwhelming majority of Americans but they are very unpopular concepts with the mega donors of our two major political parties. The wealthy and powerful folks financing the campaigns of GOP and Dem politicians will never permit an AOC or Bernie being given a fair chance at a major party nomination.
This is the political world we live in.
Anonymous
05/19/2025 16:31
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pete’s problem is that he didn’t do anything while in Sec of Trans. So much is coming out about how things have been deteriorating for years. Clearly these are things he could have gotten started on and apparently he didn’t and perhaps made worse. His connecting to the failed Biden admin is a problem. And for those who want to say the Biden admin was a great success, just stop. Those of us in government know how rudderless it was for 4 years. I am 25 year fed and there was never a time when so little was done and so little was even attempted. And it wasn’t Covid for all 4 years. No one was running anything.
Being a part of an unpopular POTUS Administration is politically damaging to a politician's future aspirations but the impact is less for those who weren't the VP. Pence and Harris, for example, will likely never be successful again if running for Federal Government level positions. I don't think Buttigieg's political career is over by any means but I also don't see 2028 Dem nominee in his future.
What Dems do have going in their favor is the fact that the 2028 GOP nominee is very likely to be a Trump endorsed candidate with close ties to Trump and therefore the 2028 nominee will be hindered by their ties to an unpopular POTUS.
Unpopular AND Ineffective AND Inept AND Out of Touch
Anonymous
05/19/2025 16:29
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should *not* be putting all their effort behind Buttigieg. The US wouldn't elect 2 high capable women - there's NO way they'll elect a gay guy.
I really like Buttigieg. I think he's be an amazing president, but we aren't there yet as a nation.
The future is Osoff. Perhaps with a Whitmer VP. Maybe, just maybe, if we have another decade to pass, the US will be in a better place to elect a female president like Whitmer.
The future is also *not* the Dems playing nice and going high when they go low. The Dems need to learn to play just as dirty.
We also aren't there yet as a nation to be able to elect a Jewish president (I'm a Jew).
I agree and I'm not a Jew but it boggles my mind that MAGAS worship an atheist who is an adjudicated rapist guilty of 34 felonies but are so racist, misogynistic, anti semitic they would never vote for a woman, Jew (or any religion other than Protestant). Quote honestly, it makes me sick that these people are allowed to contribute to the gene pool let alone allowed to vote!
Why does someone’s religion matter? Dems are stuck on identity politics. Didn’t learn their lesson from last November.
Anonymous
05/19/2025 16:28
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
They should nominate AOC or Bernie Sanders to be their Presidential candidate. Operation: Let Them Talk
Anonymous
05/19/2025 16:25
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should *not* be putting all their effort behind Buttigieg. The US wouldn't elect 2 high capable women - there's NO way they'll elect a gay guy.
I really like Buttigieg. I think he's be an amazing president, but we aren't there yet as a nation.
The future is Osoff. Perhaps with a Whitmer VP. Maybe, just maybe, if we have another decade to pass, the US will be in a better place to elect a female president like Whitmer.
The future is also *not* the Dems playing nice and going high when they go low. The Dems need to learn to play just as dirty.
We also aren't there yet as a nation to be able to elect a Jewish president (I'm a Jew).
I agree and I'm not a Jew but it boggles my mind that MAGAS worship an atheist who is an adjudicated rapist guilty of 34 felonies but are so racist, misogynistic, anti semitic they would never vote for a woman, Jew (or any religion other than Protestant). Quote honestly, it makes me sick that these people are allowed to contribute to the gene pool let alone allowed to vote!
Anonymous
05/19/2025 15:30
Subject: What *should* Democrats be doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pete’s problem is that he didn’t do anything while in Sec of Trans. So much is coming out about how things have been deteriorating for years. Clearly these are things he could have gotten started on and apparently he didn’t and perhaps made worse. His connecting to the failed Biden admin is a problem. And for those who want to say the Biden admin was a great success, just stop. Those of us in government know how rudderless it was for 4 years. I am 25 year fed and there was never a time when so little was done and so little was even attempted. And it wasn’t Covid for all 4 years. No one was running anything.
Pete increased the number of air traffic controllers hired for the first time in many years, and he kept the skies safe. He proposed more funding for the software but it was voted down in Congress.
Did he really keep the sky near us safe?
https://wjla.com/news/local/ntsb-reveals-findings-of-over-15000-close-calls-near-reagan-national-airport-deadly-midair-collision-potomac-river-national-transportation-safety-board-dca-plane-crash-victims-investigation-air-traffic-control-fbi-washington-dc