Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1921175185836708140

Nazi site says:

"Over the past 48 hours, @VP
Vance and I have engaged with senior Indian and Pakistani officials, including Prime Ministers Narendra Modi and Shehbaz Sharif, External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir, and National Security Advisors Ajit Doval and Asim Malik.

I am pleased to announce the Governments of India and Pakistan have agreed to an immediate ceasefire and to start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site.

We commend Prime Ministers Modi and Sharif on their wisdom, prudence, and statesmanship in choosing the path of peace."

India says Pakistan leaders and Trump/Rubio are liars, and ceasefire was over within 3hrs of start.

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/asia/live-blog/india-pakistan-rcna206000

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1921175185836708140

This news is inconvenient to the narrative. Please stick to the DCUM approved script.

Did you have a stroke?

The U.S. government brokered a de-escalation.

Anonymous wrote:Immediate ceasefire was announced. That’s good news for once.

Yes, despite what the New York Times wants to say, Trump had nothing to do with this. This deal was broker by the Indian & Pakistan governments.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/pakistan-india-hint-at-de-escalation_n_681f3c1de4b0108bb6b708d0

Immediate ceasefire was announced. That’s good news for once.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muslim are colonizers.

Maybe revisit histories of the British as the original colonizers, who created an artificial border between India and Pakistan, and broke families and friendships a part. The partition is classic colonization.

Hindis and Muslims actually got along relatively well for centuries until the British came in and stirred up divisions. Divide and conquer. The British were awful.

I mean, c’mon. The Muslim conquest of India has been described as “the bloodiest story in history.”

https://ashishshukla-92505.medium.com/bloodiest-story-of-human-history-and-its-long-shadow-on-a-resurgent-india-cf5866072fc9

LOL at quoting Ashish Shukla as some type of legitimate source. You might as well ask a Zionist the history of Palestine

You realize, of course, that he was just quoting Will Durant?

Be serious. There’s no dispute whatsoever that there’s a long and bloody history that FAR predates British involvement.

Sorry if actual history doesn’t fit your agenda.

You do realize I can quote other historians to the contrary like Romila Thapar. Sorry it doesn't fit your agenda

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muslim are colonizers.

Maybe revisit histories of the British as the original colonizers, who created an artificial border between India and Pakistan, and broke families and friendships a part. The partition is classic colonization.

Hindis and Muslims actually got along relatively well for centuries until the British came in and stirred up divisions. Divide and conquer. The British were awful.

I mean, c’mon. The Muslim conquest of India has been described as “the bloodiest story in history.”

https://ashishshukla-92505.medium.com/bloodiest-story-of-human-history-and-its-long-shadow-on-a-resurgent-india-cf5866072fc9

LOL at quoting Ashish Shukla as some type of legitimate source. You might as well ask a Zionist the history of Palestine

You realize, of course, that he was just quoting Will Durant?

Be serious. There’s no dispute whatsoever that there’s a long and bloody history that FAR predates British involvement.

Sorry if actual history doesn’t fit your agenda.

Maybe there’s no dispute in your Islamophobic mind but the Hindus lived in much better and safer conditions under the Mughals than they did under the British. Sorry if actual facts don’t fit your Islamophobia but you’d rather prefer the poor treatment under the British rule than accept that Muslims and Hindus lived peacefully under the Mughal rule.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muslim are colonizers.

Maybe revisit histories of the British as the original colonizers, who created an artificial border between India and Pakistan, and broke families and friendships a part. The partition is classic colonization.

Hindis and Muslims actually got along relatively well for centuries until the British came in and stirred up divisions. Divide and conquer. The British were awful.

I mean, c’mon. The Muslim conquest of India has been described as “the bloodiest story in history.”

https://ashishshukla-92505.medium.com/bloodiest-story-of-human-history-and-its-long-shadow-on-a-resurgent-india-cf5866072fc9

LOL at quoting Ashish Shukla as some type of legitimate source. You might as well ask a Zionist the history of Palestine

You realize, of course, that he was just quoting Will Durant?

Be serious. There’s no dispute whatsoever that there’s a long and bloody history that FAR predates British involvement.

Sorry if actual history doesn’t fit your agenda.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muslim are colonizers.

Maybe revisit histories of the British as the original colonizers, who created an artificial border between India and Pakistan, and broke families and friendships a part. The partition is classic colonization.

Hindis and Muslims actually got along relatively well for centuries until the British came in and stirred up divisions. Divide and conquer. The British were awful.

No, it started long before the British with Aurangzeb. They exploited the situation to the hilt but the foundations had already cracked.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muslim are colonizers.

Maybe revisit histories of the British as the original colonizers, who created an artificial border between India and Pakistan, and broke families and friendships a part. The partition is classic colonization.

Hindis and Muslims actually got along relatively well for centuries until the British came in and stirred up divisions. Divide and conquer. The British were awful.

I mean, c’mon. The Muslim conquest of India has been described as “the bloodiest story in history.”

https://ashishshukla-92505.medium.com/bloodiest-story-of-human-history-and-its-long-shadow-on-a-resurgent-india-cf5866072fc9

LOL at quoting Ashish Shukla as some type of legitimate source. You might as well ask a Zionist the history of Palestine

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muslim are colonizers.

Maybe revisit histories of the British as the original colonizers, who created an artificial border between India and Pakistan, and broke families and friendships a part. The partition is classic colonization.

Hindis and Muslims actually got along relatively well for centuries until the British came in and stirred up divisions. Divide and conquer. The British were awful.

I mean, c’mon. The Muslim conquest of India has been described as “the bloodiest story in history.”

https://ashishshukla-92505.medium.com/bloodiest-story-of-human-history-and-its-long-shadow-on-a-resurgent-india-cf5866072fc9

This story is a back-page event. Until:

- a nuclear weapon is detonated.

BOTH countries have nuclear weapons. They like have dozens of warheads by now.

It is only a matter of time until a nuclear-armed nation detonates a nuke in anger.

Will it be this time?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muslim are colonizers.

Maybe revisit histories of the British as the original colonizers, who created an artificial border between India and Pakistan, and broke families and friendships a part. The partition is classic colonization.

Hindis and Muslims actually got along relatively well for centuries until the British came in and stirred up divisions. Divide and conquer. The British were awful.

That's pretty much the story in every place they colonized.

Yes, I am the OP of the original post. They perfected this strategy in multiple places across the globe such as in British North American and breaking Indigenous kinship and territories apart. India, Africa, Ireland, etc…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muslim are colonizers.

Maybe revisit histories of the British as the original colonizers, who created an artificial border between India and Pakistan, and broke families and friendships a part. The partition is classic colonization.

Hindis and Muslims actually got along relatively well for centuries until the British came in and stirred up divisions. Divide and conquer. The British were awful.

That's pretty much the story in every place they colonized.